Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회지)

The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Heterofermentative Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Quality of Italian Ryegrass and Whole-crop Barley Silage

Hetero 발효 유산균주 첨가가 사일리지용 이탈리안 라이그라스와 총체보리의 품질에 미치는 효과

  • Received : 2014.10.21
  • Accepted : 2014.12.09
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the quality of italian ryegrass (IRG) and whole- crop barley (WCB) silage combined with heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria (LAB) during fermentation. Six strains of LAB (L. plantarum IMAU 70164, L. acidophilus KACC 12419, L. casei KACC 12413, L. reuteri KCTC 3594, L. buchneri KACC 12416 and L. diolivorans KACC 12385) were used in this study. L. casei and L. reuteri had the highest propionic acid production and were therefore used for fermenting the forages. The forages were fermented using monoculture and co-culture of L. casei and L. reuteri for 30, 45 and 60 days of ensiling. Addition of LAB lowered the pH of the IRG silage (p<0.05). Moisture content, lactic acid and acetic acid contents were higher (p<0.05) after addition of LAB. Water soluble carbohydrate was significantly lower (p<0.05) in WCB with a co-culture containing L. casei and L. reuteri. Propionic acid production was comparatively higher after addition of LAB to WCB on days 30, 45 and 60 while butyric acid was only detected in the IRG control on day 60. Fungi was not detected within 60 days after addition of LAB in IRG and WCB. Through this experiment, improved forage preservation was achieved using a co-culture containing L. casei and L. reuteri. WCB silage had higher propionic acid concentration and thus, it was a better forage for ensiling using co-culture of L. casei and L. reuteri.

본 연구에서는 hetero 발효유산균 첨가가 이탈리안 라이그라스 및 총체보리 사일리지의 사료가치 및 발효품질에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 사일리지 접종균주를 선발하기 위해 유산균 6종(L. plantarum IMAU 70164, L. acidophilus KACC 12419, L. casei KACC 12413, L. reuteri KCTC 3594, L. buchneri KACC 12416 and L. diolivorans KACC 12385)을 이용하였으며, 젖산 함량이 높은 L. casei KACC 12416와 프로피온산 함량이 높은 L. reuteri KCTC 3594을 최종 선택하여 사일리지를 제조하였다. 처리구는 대조구, L. casei 첨가구, L. reuteri 첨가구 및 L. casei, L. reuteri 혼합첨가구로 하여 30일, 45일 및 60일간 저장하였다. pH는 IRG 사일리지의 경우 유산균 첨가구가 대조구에 비해 낮았으며(p<0.05), 수분함량, 젖산 및 초산함량 또한 유산균을 첨가한 처리구에서 낮은 것으로 나타났다(p<0.05). 수용성 탄수화물의 함량은 L. casei KACC 12416와 L. reuteri KCTC 3594를 혼합배양한 처리구에서 가장 낮았다(p<0.05). 프로피온산은 유산균을 접종한 총체보리에서 전 기간동안 높게 나타났으며, 반면에 사일리지 품질을 저해시키는 butyrate는 발효 60일의 대조구에서 측정되었다. 사일리지의 미생물 측정결과 IRG 사일리지 배양 60일에 유산균 첨가구에서 곰팡이가 억제되었으며, WCB 사일리지는 유산균을 첨가한 처리구에서 곰팡이가 검출되지 않았다. 이상의 연구 결과들로 볼 때, 단일 균주를 접종한 사일리지에 비해 co-culture (L. casei + L. reuteri)로 접종했을 때 사일리지 저장품질 개선에 보다 효과적이었으며, 혼합배양한 처리구가 청보리 사일리지내 높은 프로피온산을 생성하며 이는 사일리지의 품질개선에 도움을 주는 것으로 조사되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Buchanan-Smith, J.G. 1990. An investigation into palatability as a factor responsible for reduced intake of silage by sheep. Animal Science. 50:253-260.
  2. Cai, Y. 2005. Quality improving technique of whole crop silage. NIAS International Symposium Proceedings. 103-136.
  3. Chaney, A.L. and Marbach, E.P. 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry. 8:130-132.
  4. Choi, K.C., Jo, N.C., Jung, M.W., Lee, K.D., Kim, J.G., Lim, Y.C., Kim, W.H., Oh, Y.K., Choi, J.H., Kim, C.M., Jung, D.K., Choi, J.M. and Kim, H.G. 2011a. Effect of harvest stage of corn on nutritive values and quality of roll baled corn silage manufactured with corn grown in paddy land. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 31:65-74. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.1.65
  5. Choi, K.C., Jung, M.W., Kim, W.H., Kim, C.M., Yoon, S.H., Choi, E.M., K., J.G., Lee, S.M., Choi, J.M., Kim, H.G. and Lim. Y.C. 2011b. Effect of harvest stage of sorghum x sorghum hybrid (SSH) on the quality of round baled SSH silage. Journal of the Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 31:143-150. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.2.143
  6. Choi, K.C., Valan Arasu, M., llavenil, S., Park, H.S., Jung, M.W., Kim, J.H., Jung, J.S., Hwangbo, S., Kim, W.H. and Lim, Y.C. 2014. Effect of addition of lactic acid chlorella on nutritive values and quality of italian ryegrass-hairy vetch silage. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 34: 39-44. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2014.34.1.39
  7. Contreras-Govea, F.E., Muck, R.E., Mertens, D.R. and Weimer, P.J. 2011. Microbial inoculant effects on silage and in vitro ruminal fermentation, and microbial biomass estimation for alfalfa, bmrcorn, and corn silages. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 163:2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.09.015
  8. Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests Biometrics. 11:1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  9. Edson, M.S., Carlos, H.O.M., Thiago, C.D.S. and Fleming S.C. 2013. Lactic acid bacteria in tropical grass silages. Lactic Acid Bacteria R&D for Food, Health and Livestock Purposes. 14: 335-362.
  10. Filya, I., Muck, R.E., Contreras-Govea, F.E., 2007. Inoculant effects on alfalfa silage: fermentation products and nutritive value. Journal of Dairy Science. 90:5108-5114. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-877
  11. Gordon, F. 1989. An evaluation through lactating cattle of a bacterial inoculant as an additive for grass silage. Grass and Forage Science. 44:169-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1989.tb01924.x
  12. Haigh, P.M. 1996. The effect of dry matter content and silage additives on the fermentation of bunker-made grass silage on commercial farms in England 1984-91. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 64:249-259. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1996.0066
  13. Hara, S., Itoh, M. and Ohyama, Y. 1979. Aerobic deterioration of silages changes in temperature, gas metabolism, heat production and microflora. Japanese Journal of Zoo Technology Science. 50:549-556.
  14. Henderson, N. 1993. Silage additives. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 45:35-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(93)90070-Z
  15. Keady, T.W.J. and Murphy, J.J. 1996. Effects of inoculant treatment on ryegrass silage fermentation, digestibility, rumen fermentation, intake and performance of lactating dairy cattle. Grass and Forage Science. 51:232-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1996.tb02058.x
  16. Kennedy, S.J., Gracey, H.I., Unsworth, E.F., Steen R.W.J. and Anderson, R. 1989. Evaluation studies in the development of a commercial bacterial inoculant as an additive for grass silage. 2. Responses in finishing cattle. Grass and Forage Science. 44:371-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1989.tb01935.x
  17. Kim, H.S. 1991. Studies on the viability of lactobacillus acidophilus IFO 3205 by microencapsulation. Ph.D. thesis. Seoul. Korea.
  18. Kim, J.K., Ham, J.S., Chung, E.S., Yoon, S.H., Kim, M.J., Park, H. S., Lim, Y.C. and Seo, S. 2008. Evaluation of Fermentation Ability of Microbes for Whole Crop Rice Silage Inoculant. Journal of the Korean Society of Grass and Forage Science. 28:229-236. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2008.28.3.229
  19. Muck, R. and Kung, L.J. 1997. Effects of silage additives on ensiling. In: Field to Feedbunk North American Conference Hershey. PA. NRAES 99.
  20. Nsereko, V.L., Smiley, B.K., Rutherford, W.M., Spielbauer, A., Forrester, K.J., Hettinger, G.H., Harman, E.K. and Harman, B.R. 2008. Influence of inoculating forage with lactic acid bacterial strains that produce ferulate esterase on ensilage and ruminal degradation of fiber. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 145:122-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.039
  21. Ogawa, M. 2003. Research of whole crop rice silage utilization in Japan. Animal Technology Research Laboratory. International Seminar Proceedings. 25-58.
  22. Patterson, D.C., Mayne, C.S., Gordon, F.J. and Kilpatrick. D.J. 1997. An evaluation of an inoculant/enzyme preparation as an additive for grass silage for dairy cattle. Grass and Forage Science. 52:325-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1997.tb02363.x
  23. SAS. 2003. SAS User's Guide. Version 9.1. SAS Institute Cary, NC.
  24. Seale, D.R. 1986. Bacterial inoculants as silage additives. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 61:9-26.
  25. Thomas T.A. 1977. An automated procedure for the determination of soluble carbohydrates in herbage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 28:639-642. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740280711
  26. Van Soest, P. and Wine, R. 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of Association Official Analytical Chemists. 50.
  27. Vetter, R. and Glan, K.V. 1978. Abnormal silages and silage related disease problems. Fermentation of Silage a Review. 281-332.
  28. Woolford, M.K. 1990. The detrimental effects of air on silage. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 68:101-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb02554.x

Cited by

  1. Effects of Selected Inoculants on Chemical Compositions and Fermentation Indices of Rye Silage Harvested at Dough Stage vol.38, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2018.38.2.99