The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects on academic achievement and satisfaction of the reciprocal peer tutoring in university calculus

대학 미분적분학에서 상호 동료 교수법이 학업성취도 및 학습만족도에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2014.02.07
  • Accepted : 2014.05.12
  • Published : 2014.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purposes of the study are to investigate the effects on academic achievement and satisfaction of the reciprocal peer tutoring in university calculus. First, we classified the test group and the control group and then applied the reciprocal peer tutoring to the test group. According to results, the reciprocal peer tutoring is very effective in improving academic achievement. Second, the pre-survey and the post-survey were conducted to the test group. The survey contains five categories including 1) background of the participants, 2) learning objectives and expectation, 3) the intention of the continual learning Mathematics, 4) the individual self-efficacy, and 5) general Mathematics learning satisfaction. We found some facts from the difference between the pre and post surveys. The learning satisfaction has improved after the reciprocal peer tutoring in the test group. Even though this trend has not changed regardless of sex, high school levels and teaching understanding.

Keywords

References

  1. 김달중 (2013). 독해와 듣기로 구성된 대학 교양영어의 학습효과 분석, 한국현대영어영문학회 가을 학술대회발표논문집, 118-125.
  2. 김연미 (2013). 기초수학 교육과정 개발 및 운영에 대한 제언, 한국공학교육학회, 공학교육연구 16(2), 58-68. Kim, Y. M.(2013). A study on the curriculum development and the management of basic college mathematics courses. Journal of Engineering Education Research 16(2), 58-68.
  3. 김영희, 허민 (2006). 수능 응시 영역에 따른 대학 교양수학 성취도 분석, 수학교육 논문집 20(4), 523-535. Kim, Y. H. & Min, H. (2006). A statistical survey of the freshmen's math achievement level according to subdivision areas of KSAT, Communications of Mathematical Education 20(4), 523-535.
  4. 노태희, 차정호, 전경문, 정태호, 한재영, 최용남 (1999). 개념 학습에 적용한 협동학습 전략에서 소집단 구성 방법의 효과, 한국과학교육학회 19(3), 400-408. Noh, T. H. & Cha, J. H. & Jeon, K. M. & Jeong, T. H. & Han, J. Y. & Choi, Y. N. (1999). The effect of grouping method cooperative learning strategy applied to concept learning, J. Korea Assoc. Soc. Edu 19(3), 400-408.
  5. 박병렬, 김범기 (2002). 과학실험 수업에서 소집단 구성방법이 중학생들의 탐구 능력 향상에 미치는 효과, 청람과학교육연구논총 12(1), 1-15. Park, B. L. & KIm, B. K. (2002). The effects of small grouping methods on science process skills in middle school students' science laboratory classes, Chung Nam Assoc. Soc. Edu. 12(1), 1-15.
  6. 박소현 (2005). 수학 학습양식 검사도구 개발을 위한 기초연구. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교. Park, S. H. (2005). Preliminary study for the development of a testing tool on the mathematical learning style. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  7. 박현화 (2007). 중학교 특별보충과정에서 상호적인 또래교수가 수학적 성취도와 수학적 자기효능감에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교. Park, H. H. (2007). The effect of reciprocal peer tutoring to mathematical achievement and self-efficacy in the under achiever class of the middle school. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  8. 손영, 김성일 (2005). 또래 교수 집단 구성방식이 학업성취도와 교과흥미에 미치는 영향, 교육심리연구 19(3), 596-613. Sohn, Y. & Kim, S. (2005). The effect of grouping format of peer tutoring on achievement and interest, The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology 19(3), 595-613.
  9. 송윤희 (2012). 대학 이러닝 수업에서 학습몰입과 학습지연을 예측하는 요인 분석, 평생학습사회 8(1), 113-135. Song, Y. H. (2013). Identifying predicting variables of the learning flow and the procrastination in university e-learning, Journal of Lifelong Learning Society 8(1), 113-135.
  10. 심재동, 하준홍, 이경희, 전창범 (2005). 미적분학 단계별 교육을 위한 교과내용 및 방법 연구, 수학교육 논문집 19(4), 633-647. Shim, J. D. & Ha, J. H. & Lee, K. H. & Chun, C. B. (2005). A study on a step-wise level educational model for calculus, Communications of Mathematical Education 19(4), 633-647.
  11. 이경희, 권혁홍 (2013). 공과대학 신입생의 자기주도학습 준비도와 수학기초학력평가성적 및 대학수학학업성취도 관계 연구, 공학교육연구 16(1), 54-63. Lee, G. H. & Kwon, H. H. (2013). A study of relationship between SDLR, the score of mathematics diagnostic assesment and achievement in college mathematics of engineering students, Journal of Engineering Education Research 16(2), 54-63.
  12. 이만희 (2013). 상호 동료 교수법이 학업성취도와 만족도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 컴퓨터 운영체제 실습수업 적용 방안을 중심으로, 한국컴퓨터학회 논문지 16(3), 61-70. Lee, M. H. (2013). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and satisfaction : focused on application practices in computer operating system lab education, J. Korea Association Computer Education 16(3), 61-70.
  13. 이재운, 박정호, 김성식 (2007). 동료학습자간 상호작용 증진을 위한 웹 기반 발표학습지원 시스템 설계 및 구현, 한국컴퓨터학회 논문지 10(6), 51-59. Lee, J. W. & Park, J. H. & Kim, S. S. (2007). Design and implementation of web-based presentation learning support system to improve interactions between peers, J. Korea Association Computer Education 10(6), 51-59..
  14. 이정례, 이경희 (2012). 자기주도학습준비도와 수학적 성향 사이의 관계 연구 - D대학교 공과대학 신입생을 중심으로, 수학교육 논문집 26(1), 15-28. Lee, J. R. & Lee, G. H. (2012). A study on the relation between SDLR and mathematical inclination - A case study on engineering freshmen in D university, Communications of Mathematical Education 26(1), 15-28.
  15. 이주연, 김희백 (2002). 중학교 과학에서 소집단 구성을 달리한 협동학습의 학습자 수준에 따른 효과, 한국생물교육학회지 30(4), 353-362. Lee, J. Y. & Kim, H. B. (2002). The effects of different grouping of cooperative learning on middle school students' scientific achievement, attitude to science class, perception of classroom learning environment and self-efficacy based on students' abilities, J. The Korean Society of Biology Education. 30(4), 353-362.
  16. 임정완 (2006). 대학 교양영어 과목 개선을 위한 사례연구, 교육연구 2(1), 47-69. Lim, J. W. (2006). A case study of general english course evaluation based on a questionnaire, Journal of education research 2(1), 47-69.
  17. 정보경 (2006). 상호적인 또래지도가 수준별 하반 학생들의 수학성취도에 미치는 효과: 일반계 고등학교 1학년 학생을 대상으로. 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교. Jeong, B. K. (2006). The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematical achievement in low-level student of 10th grade of the general high school. Master's thesis, KNUE.
  18. 정수연, 강윤수 (2013). 공과대학생들의 학습 양식을 고려한 수학 교수-학습 모형 개발 및 적용, 수학교육논문집 27(4), 407-427. Jeong, S. Y. & Kang, Y. S. (2013). Development and application of mathematics teaching-learning model considering learning styles of the students of engineering college, Communications of Mathematical Education 27(4), 407-427.
  19. 정수연, 송영무 (2011). 대학 공업수학 학습자료 개발 및 효과, 수학교육 논문집 25(2), 361-379. Jeong, S. Y. & Song, Y. M. (2011). Investigation of the effect of a learning program for university engineering mathematics, Communications of Mathematical Education 25(2), 361-379.
  20. 최계현, 한혜숙 (2013). 상호또래교수 활동이 고등학생들의 수학교과에 대한 정의적 특성에 미치는 영향, 수학교육 52(3), 423-442. Choi, K. H. & Han, H. S. (2013). A study on the effects of the reciprocal peer tutoring in high school students' affective characteristics of mathematics, The Mathematical Education 52(3), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2013.52.3.423
  21. 표용수, 조성진, 정진문, 박진한 (2009). 교양수학 교과목에 대한 교수-학습지도 개선 방안-기초 미적분학 교과목을 중심으로, 수학교육 논문집 23(3), 823-848. Pyo, Y. S. & Cho, S. J. & Jeong, J. M. & Park, J. H. (2009). Improvement of teaching-learning methods for general mathematics education courses - Focused on basic calculus, Communications of Mathematical Education 23(3), 823-848.
  22. 표용수, 박준식 (2010). 대학 수학 기초학력 부진학생을 위한 기초수학 지도 방안, 수학교육 논문집 24(3), 525-541. Pyo, Y. S. & Park, J. S. (2010). Effective management strategies of basic mathematics for low achievement students in university general mathematics, Communications of Mathematical Education 24(3), 525-541.
  23. 표용수, 박준식 (2011). 대학 기초수학 교과목에 대한 수준별 학습 지도 방안, 수학교육학 연구 21(1), 87-103. Pyo, Y. S. & Park, J. S. (2011). Effective management strategies of university basic mathematics by ability grouping, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics. 21(1), 87-103.
  24. 홍대기, 조태경, 박병수 (2008). 상명대학교 공과대학 수학교육 강화방안 연구, 한국산학기술학회논문지 9(5), 1479-1486. Hong, D. K. & Cho, T. K. & Park, B. S. (2008). A study on enhancement of mathematics education for engineering college in sang-myung university, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 9(5), 1479-1486. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2008.9.5.1479
  25. Bargh, J. A. & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching, Journal of Education Psychology 72, 593-604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.72.5.593
  26. Bowers, C. A., Pharmer, J. A., & Salas, E. (2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta-analysis, Small Group Research 31(3), 305-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100303
  27. Cook, S. B., Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Castro, G. C. (1985). Handicapped students as tutors, The Journal of Special Education 19(4), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698501900410
  28. Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J. J., & Hall, R. V. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring, Exceptional Children 52(6), 535-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298605200606
  29. Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (2001). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms, New Jersey : Prentice Hall.
  30. Fantuzzo, J. W., Polite, K., & Grayson, N. (1990). An evaluation of reciprocal peer tutoring across elementary school setting, Journal of School Psychology 28, 309-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(90)90021-X
  31. Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effect of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A Component analysis, Journal of Educational Psychology 84(3), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.331
  32. Gaustad, J. (1993). Peer and cross-age tutoring, Remedial and Special Education 18, 367-379.
  33. Ginsberg-Block, M., & Fantuzzo, J. (1997). Reciprocal peer tutoring: A analysis of 'teacher' and 'student' interactions as a function of training and experience, School Psychology Quarterly 12(2), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088955
  34. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. L., & Hall, V. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction, School Psychology Review 17, 258-275.
  35. Griffin, M. M. & Griffin, B. W. (1995). An investigation of the effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on achievement, self-efficacy and test anxiety, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 383 756.
  36. Jenkins, J., & Jenkins, L. (1985). Peer tutoring in elementary and secondary programs, Focus on Exceptional Children 17, 3-12.
  37. Lane, K. S. (1997). An analysis of effects of peer tutoring on spelling in a second grade classroom, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 411 502.
  38. Palincsar, A. S., & Herroenkohl, L. R. (2002). Designing collaborative learning context, Theory into Practice 41(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5
  39. Rohrbeck, C. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review, Journal of Educational Psychology 95(2), 240-257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240
  40. Shisler, L. (1986). Behaviorally disordered students as reverse-role tutors: Increasing social acceptance and reading skills, B. C. Journal of Special Education 10(2), 101-119.
  41. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know, Contemporary Educational Psychology 21(1), 43-69. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
  42. Utley, C. A., Mortweet, S. L., & Greenwood, C. R. (1997). Peer-mediated instruction and interventions, Focus on Exceptional Children 25(9), 1-23.
  43. Warger, C. L. (1991). Peer tutoring: When working together is better than working alone, Research & Resources on Special Education 30, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 345 459.