Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic control response of structures using an ATMD with fuzzy logic controller and PSO method

  • Received : 2013.07.08
  • Accepted : 2014.04.04
  • Published : 2014.08.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study focuses on the application of an active tuned mass damper (ATMD) for controlling the seismic response of an 11-story building. The control action is achieved by combination of a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) method. FLC is used to handle the uncertain and nonlinear phenomena while PSO is used for optimization of FLC parameters. The FLC system optimized by PSO is called PSFLC. The optimization process of the FLC system has been performed for an 11-story building under the earthquake excitations recommended by International Association of Structural Control (IASC) committee. Minimization of the top floor displacement has been used as the optimization criteria. The results obtained by the PSFLC method are compared with those obtained from ATMD with GFLC system which is proposed by Pourzeynali et al. and non-optimum FLC system. Based on the parameters obtained from PSFLC system, a global controller as PSFLCG is introduced. Performance of the designed PSFLCG has been checked for different disturbances of far-field and near-field ground motions. It is found that the ATMD system, driven by FLC with the help of PSO significantly reduces the peak displacement of the example building. The results show that the PSFLCG decreases the peak displacement of the top floor by about 10%-30% more than that of the FLC system. To show the efficiency and superiority of the adopted optimization method (PSO), a comparison is also made between PSO and GA algorithms in terms of success rate and computational processing time. GA is used by Pourzeynali et al for optimization of the similar system.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdel-Rohman, M. (1984), "Optimal design of active TMD for buildings control" Build. Environ., 19(3), 191-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(84)90026-X
  2. Ahlawat, A.S. and Ramaswamy, A. (2002), "Multi-objective optimal design of FLC driven hybrid mass damper for seismically excited structures" Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(7), 1459-1479. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.173
  3. Al-Dawod, M., Samali, B. and Li, J. (2006), "Experimental verification of an active mass driver system on a five-storey model using a fuzzy controller" Struct. Cont. Hlth. Monit., 13(5), 917-943. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.97
  4. Al-Dawod, M., Samali, B., Naghdy, F. and Kwok, K. (2001), "Active control of along wind response of tall building using a fuzzy controller" Eng. Struct., 23(11), 1512-1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00037-2
  5. Aly, M.A. (2014), "Vibration control of high-rise buildings for wind: a robust passive and active tuned mass damper" Smart. Struct. System, 13(3), 473-500. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.3.473
  6. Battaini, M., Casciati, F. and Faravelli, L. (1998), "Fuzzy control of structural vibration. An active mass system driven by a fuzzy controller" Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(11), 1267-1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(1998110)27:11<1267::AID-EQE782>3.0.CO;2-D
  7. Bekdas, G. and Nigdeli, S.M. (2011), "Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony search" Eng. Struct., 33(9), 2716-2723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.024
  8. Chang, J.C.H. and Soong, T.T. (1980), "Structural control using active tuned mass dampers" J. Eng. Mech- ASME, 106(6), 1091-1098.
  9. Chen, H., Sun, Z. and Sun, L. (2011), "Active mass damper control for cable stayed bridge under construction: an experimental study" Struct. Eng. Mech., 38(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.38.2.141
  10. Chen, J., Peng, W., Ge, R. and Wei, J. (2009), "Optimal design of composite laminates for minimizing delamination stresses by particle Swarm optimization combined with FEM" Struct. Eng. Mech., 31(4), 407-421. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.31.4.407
  11. Collins, R., Basu, B. and Broderick, B. (2006), "Control strategy using bang-bang and minimax principle for FRF with ATMDs" Eng. Struct., 28(3), 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.012
  12. Contreras, M.T., Pasala, D.T.R. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2014), "Adaptive length SMA pendulum smart tuned Mass damper performance in the presence of real time primary system stiffness change" Smart. Struct. System, 13(2), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.2.219
  13. Farshidianfar, A. and Soheili, S. (2013a), "ABC optimization of TMD parameters for tall buildings with soil structure interaction" Interact. Multiscale. Mech., 6(4), 339-356. https://doi.org/10.12989/imm.2013.6.4.339
  14. Farshidianfar, A. and Soheili, S. (2013b), "Ant colony optimization of tuned mass dampers for earthquake oscillations of high-rise structures including soil-structure interaction" Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 51(0), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.04.002
  15. Gattulli, V., Di Fabio, F. and Luongo, A. (2004), "Nonlinear tuned mass damper for self-excited oscillations" Wind. Struct., 7(4), 251-264. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2004.7.4.251
  16. Guclu, R. and Sertbas, A. (2005), "Evaluation of sliding mode and proportional-integral-derivative controlled structures with an active mass damper" J. Vib. Control., 11(3), 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546305051202
  17. Guclu, R. and Yazici, H. (2008), "Vibration control of a structure with ATMD against earthquake using fuzzy logic controllers" Sound. Vib., 318(1-2), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.03.058
  18. Hadi, M.N.S. and Arfiadi, Y. (1998), "Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures" J. Struct. Eng- ASCE, 124(11), 1272-1280. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1272)
  19. Jang, D.D., Jung, H.J. and Moon, Y.J. (2014), "Active mass damper system using time delay control algorithm for building structure with unknown dynamics" Smart. Struct. System, 13(2), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.2.305
  20. Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R. (1995), "Particle swarm optimization" Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.
  21. Leung, A.Y.T. and Zhang, H. (2009), "Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers" Eng. Struct., 31(3), 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.017
  22. Leung, A.Y.T., Zhang, H., Cheng C.C. and Lee, Y.Y. (2008), "Particle swarm optimization of TMD by nonstationary base excitation during earthquake" Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(9), 1223-1246. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.811
  23. Lin, P.Y., Lin, T.K. and Hwang, J.S. (2013), "A semi-active mass damping system for low- and mid-rise buildings" Earthq. Struct., 4(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.1.063
  24. Lu, X., Ding, K., Shi, W. and Weng, D. (2012), "Tuned mass dampers for human-induced vibration control of the Expo Culture Centre at the World Expo 2010 in Shanghai, China" Struct. Eng. Mech., 43(5), 607-621. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.43.5.607
  25. Marano, G.C., Greco, R. and Chiaia, B. (2010), "A comparison between different optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers design" Sound. Vib., 329(23), 4880-4890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.05.015
  26. Marano, G.C., Greco, R. and Palombella, G. (2008), "Stochastic optimum design of linear tuned mass dampers for seismic protection of high towers" Struct. Eng. Mech., 29(6), 603-622. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2008.29.6.603
  27. Matta, E. (2011), "Performance of tuned mass dampers against near-field earthquakes" Struct. Eng. Mech., 39(5), 621-642. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.39.5.621
  28. Matta, E. (2013), "Effectiveness of tuned mass dampers against ground motion pulses" J. Struct. Eng- ASCE, 139(2), 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000629
  29. Nagarajaiah, S. and Jung, H.J. (2014), "Smart tuned mass dampers: recent developments" Smart. Struct. System, 13(2), 173-176. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.2.173
  30. Nagarajaiah, S. and Sonmez, E. (2007), "Structures with Semiactive Variable Stiffness Single/Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers" Struct. Eng., 133(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(67)
  31. Nigdeli, S.M. and Bekdas, G. (2013), "Optimum tuned mass damper design for preventing brittle fracture of RC buildings" Smart. Struct. System, 12(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.12.2.137
  32. Nishimura, I., Kobori,T., Sakamoto, M., Koshika, N., Sasaki, K. and Ohrui, S. (1992), "Active tuned mass damper" Smart. Material. Struct., 1(4), 306. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/1/4/005
  33. Palazzo, B. and Petti, L. (1999), "Optimal structural control in the frequency domain: Control in norm $H_{2}$ and $H_{{\infty}}$" J. Struct. Cont., 6(2), 205-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.4300060202
  34. Park, S.J., Lee, J., Jung, H.J., Jang, D.D. and Kim, S.D. (2009), "Numerical and experimental investigation of control performance of active Mass damper system to high-rise building in use" Wind. Struct., 12(4), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2009.12.4.313
  35. Pasala, D.T.R. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2014), "Adaptive-length pendulum smart tuned Mass damper using shape-memory-alloy wire for tuning period in real time" Smart. Struct. System, 13(2), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.2.203
  36. Pourzeynali, S., Lavasani, H.H. and Modarayi, A.H. (2007), "Active control of high rise building structures using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms" Eng. Struct., 29(3), 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.015
  37. Sadek, F., Mohraz, B., Taylor, A.W. and Chung, R.M. (1997), "A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications" Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26(6), 617-635. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199706)26:6<617::AID-EQE664>3.0.CO;2-Z
  38. Samali, B. and Al-Dawod, M. (2003), "Performance of a five-storey benchmark model using an active tuned mass damper and a fuzzy controller" Eng. Struct., 25(13), 1597-1610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00132-9
  39. Samali, B., Al-Dawod, M., Kwok , K. and Naghdy, F. (2004), "Active control of cross wind response of 76- Story tall building using a fuzzy controller" J. Eng. Mech- ASME, 130(4), 492-498. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(492)
  40. Setareh, M. (2001), "Use of semi-active Mass dampers for vibration control of force-excited structures. " Struct. Eng. Mech., 11(4), 341-356. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.11.4.341
  41. Shariatmadar, H., Golnargesi, S. and Akbarzadeh T.M.R. (2014), "Vibration control of buildings using ATMD against earthquake excitations through interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller" Asian. J. Civil. Eng- Bhrc, 15(3), 321-338.
  42. Sun, C., Nagarajaiah, S. and Dick, A.J. (2014), "Family of smart tuned mass dampers with variable frequency under harmonic excitations and ground motions: closed-form evaluation" Smart. Struct. System, 13(2), 319-341. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.2.319
  43. Tang, H., Zhang, W., Xie, L. and Xue, S. (2013), "Multi-stage approach for structural damage identification using Particle Swarm optimization" Smart. Struct. System, 11(1), 319-341.
  44. Tributsch, A. and Adam, C. (2012), "Evaluation and analytical approximation of Tuned Mass Damper performance in an earthquake environment ", Smart. Struct. System, 10(2), 69-86.
  45. Varadarajan, N. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2004), "Wind response control of building with variable stiffness tuned mass damper using empirical mode decomposition/Hilbert transform" J. Eng. Mech- ASME, 130(4), 451-458. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(451)
  46. Villaverde, R. (1985), "Reduction seismic response with heavily-damped vibration absorbers" Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 13(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290130105
  47. Villaverde, R. and Koyama, L.A. (1993), "Damped resonant appendages to increase inherent damping in buildings" Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 22(6), 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290220603
  48. Wang, A.P. and Lin, Y.H. (2007), "Vibration control of a tall building subjected to earthquake excitation" Sound. Vib., 299(4-5), 757-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.07.016
  49. Warburton, G.B. (1982), "Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters" Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 10(3), 381-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290100304
  50. Woo, S.S., Lee, S.H. and Chung, L. (2011), "Seismic response control of elastic and inelastic structures by using passive and semi-active tuned mass dampers" Smart. Struct. System, 8(3), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2011.8.3.239
  51. Xu, H.b., Zhang, C.w., Li, H., Ping, T., Ou, J.p. and Zhou, F.l. (2014), "Active mass driver control system for suppressing wind-induced vibration of the Canton Tower" Smart. Struct. System, 13(2), 281-303. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.2.281
  52. Yao, J.T.P. (1972), "Concept of Structural Control" J. Struct. Div., 98(7), 1567-1574.
  53. Zadeh, L.A. (1975), "The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I" Inform. Sci., 8(3), 199-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5

Cited by

  1. Seismic control of buildings with active tuned mass damper through interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller including soil–structure interaction 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0016-5
  2. Design of double dynamic vibration absorbers for reduction of two DOF vibration system vol.57, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.57.1.161
  3. A Review on Adaptive Methods for Structural Control vol.10, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501610010653
  4. Parametric study of pendulum type dynamic vibration absorber for controlling vibration of a two DOF structure vol.13, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.1.051
  5. Proposing optimum parameters of TMDs using GSA and PSO algorithms for drift reduction and uniformity vol.63, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.63.2.147
  6. Semi-active leverage-type isolation system considering minimum structural energy vol.21, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.21.3.373
  7. Adaptive sliding mode vibrations control for civil engineering earthquake excited structures vol.7, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-019-00559-0
  8. Optimum Design of PID Controlled Active Tuned Mass Damper via Modified Harmony Search vol.10, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082976
  9. LMI based criterion for reinforced concrete frame structures vol.9, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2020.9.4.407
  10. Advanced controller design for AUV based on adaptive dynamic programming vol.5, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2020.5.3.233
  11. Optimized AI controller for reinforced concrete frame structures under earthquake excitation vol.11, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2021.11.1.001
  12. Smart structural control and analysis for earthquake excited building with evolutionary design vol.79, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.79.2.131