Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Performance and Prediction Factors in College and University Libraries using Statistical Analyses

대학도서관 통계분석을 통한 대학도서관 성과 및 영향요인에 대한 연구

  • 김기영 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 최윤희 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 강재연 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 고평진 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2014.09.15
  • Accepted : 2014.09.19
  • Published : 2014.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The goal of this study is an exploratory statistical analysis of the university and college library statistics in the Academic Information Statistics System(rinfo.kr) governed of Korean Education and Research Information Service(KERIS) with performance measures based on sustainability. For the goal, we adopt a preprocessing method to develop change-rate variables by considering preceding predictive elements and succeeding performance elements, and to control external factors, such as size and socioeconomic factors. Then we execute a series of factor analyses and multiple linear regression analyses. 13 factors are extracted by the factor analyses and some sets of significant variables affecting the performance measures are identified through the regression analyses. Based on the results, we discuss the problem of out-lier and low correlation between variables. A suggestion for developing new variables is also discussed based on low effect sizes of the developed regression models. We hope that this study contributes to diffuse discussions on statistics system, evaluation, and further library management based on sustainability.

본 연구는 한국교육학술정보원(KERIS)이 운영하는 학술정보통계시스템(rinfo.kr)의 2010-2013년간 대학도서관통계를 대상으로 지속가능성에 기반한 경영자원 확보를 성과요소로 한 탐색적 통계분석을 목표로 한다. 이를 위해 선행되는 영향요소 및 후행되는 성과요소를 고려하고 규모 및 사회경제적인 외부변인들을 통제하기 위한 변화율 중심의 변수를 산출하는 전처리 방법을 통계에 적용하였으며, 이를 통한 변수를 대상으로 요인분석과 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 요인분석 결과 13개의 요인을 추출할 수 있었으며, 회귀분석 결과 대학도서관 경영자원 확보에 영향을 미치는 변수를 확인하였다. 분석결과를 바탕으로 극단값의 문제, 변수 간 낮은 상관성, 그리고 낮은 효과크기를 배경으로 한 새로운 변수의 개발을 논의하였다. 본 연구를 통해 지속가능성에 기반한 대학도서관의 통계체계, 평가, 나아가 경영에 대한 논의가 확산되기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김기영, 이재윤, 오경은. 2008. 한국 공공도서관 통계의 탐색적 분석. 제15회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 111-116. 2008년 8월 20일. 서울 상명대학교: 제15회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회. (Kim, Giyeong, Jae Yun Lee, and Kyong Eun Oh. 2008. An Exploratory Analysis of Korean Public Library Statistics. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 2008.)
  2. 김기영, 최상기, 김주섭, 안혜림. 2014. 대학도서관평가 표준지표 개발에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 48(3): 303-334. (Kim, Giyeong, Sang-Ki Choi, Ju-Sup Kim, and Hye-Rim Ahn. 2014. "A Study on the Development of Standard Indicators for College & University Libraries' Evaluation." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(3): 303-334.)
  3. 김선애. 2008. 대학도서관의 이용자만족도와 충성도에 관한 연구: K대학도서관의 이용자를 대상으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(3): 281-299. (Kim, Sun-Ae. 2008. "A Study on the User Satisfaction and Loyalty of University Library Users." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(3): 281-299.) https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.3.281
  4. 도서관법. 법률 제11310호, 2012.2.27. 일부개정. [online]. [cited 2014.6.18]. . (Korean Library Act. Act No. 11310. Partially amended 2012.2.27. [online]. [cited 2014.6.18]. .)
  5. 백항기, 이은철. 2000. 대학도서관 서비스 질의 구성요인 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 34(4): 5-26. (Paik, Hang-Ki and Eun-Chul Lee. 2000. "The Factor Analyses of Service Quality Components in University Libraries." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 34(4): 5-26.)
  6. 손정표. 1994. 대학도서관 직원규모에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 21: 159-193. (Sohn, Jung Pyo. 1994. "A Study on Factors Affecting Staff Size of University Libraries in Korea." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 21: 159-193.)
  7. 양병훈. 2008. 서울 소재 대학도서관 운영성과의 결정요인에 관한 실증연구: 대출성과를 중심으로. 정보관리연구, 39(2): 163-184. (Yang, Byung-Hoon. 2008. "An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Operating Performance of Academic Libraries in Seoul." Journal of Information Management, 39(2): 163-184.) https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.2.163
  8. 윤희윤. 2001. 국내 대학도서관의 평가모형 개발에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 32(4): 45-75. (Yoon, Hee-Yoon. 2001. "A Study on the Development of Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Korean University Libraries." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 32(4): 45-75.)
  9. 최신 문헌정보학의 이해 편찬위원회. 2013. 최신 문헌정보학의 이해. 개정증보2판. 서울: 한국도서관협회.(Committee of Compiling Understanding Current Library and Information Science. 2013. Understanding Current Library and Information Science. 2nd Revision and Enlargement. Seoul: Korean Library Association.)
  10. 한국교육학술정보원. 2013. 2013 대학도서관 통계분석 자료집. 대구: 한국교육학술정보원. 연구보고 CR 2013-16.(Korean Education And Research Information Service(KERIS). 2013. 2013 Statistical Analysis Package on University and College Library. Taegu: Korean Education And Research Information Service(KERIS).)
  11. Childers, Thomas. 1975. "Statistics that Describe Libraries and Library Services." In Advances in Librarianship, Ed. by Melvin J. Voigt, vol.5. 107-122. New York: Academic Press.
  12. Covey, Denise Troll. 2002. Usage and Usability Assessment: Library Practices and Concerns. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. [online]. [cited 2014.6.25]. .
  13. Crawford, John. 2000. Evaluation of Library and Information Services. 2nd Ed. London, UK: Aslib.
  14. Crawford, John. 2006. The Culture of Evaluation in Library and Information Services. Oxford, UK: Chandos,
  15. Davis, Denise M. 2007. "The Status of Public Library Funding, 2003. 2005: Impact of Local Operating Revenue Fluctuation." Public Library Quarterly, 25(1.2): 5-26.
  16. Hernon, Peter and Robert D. E. 2006. "Future Directions in Outcomes Assessment." In Revisiting Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education. Ed. by Peter Hernon, Robert E. Dugan, & Candy Schwartz. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. 367-396.
  17. Hiller, Steve and James Self. 2004. "From Measurement to Management: Using Data Wisely for Planning and Decision-making." Library Trends, 53(1): 129-155.
  18. Holton, Barbara, Kaleen Vaden, and Williams Jeffrey. 2006. Academic Libraries: 2004: First Look. [online]. [cited 2014.6.23]. .
  19. Ismail, Junaida, Aishah Musa, Mahadir Ladisma@Awis, and Sharunizam Shari. 2011. "The Performance of Academic Libraries: A Case Study at Research University (Rus) in Malaysia."Global Journal of Human Social Science, 11(8): 19-23.
  20. ISO. 2013. ISO 2789:2013 Information and Documentation: International Library Statistics. 5th Ed. Geneva, Switzerland. ISO Copyright Office.
  21. Kim, Giyeong and So Young Yu. 2011. "An Exploratory Study to Develop an Alternative Model of Public Library Management using the Institute of Museum and Library Services' Public Library Statistics." The Library Quarterly, 81(4): 359-382. https://doi.org/10.1086/661656
  22. Kim, Giyeong and Yoonhee Choi. 2012. "A Suggestion of Criteria for Categorizing Libraries into Types: Linking between Library and Information." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(1): 395-404. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.395
  23. Lancaster, F. Wilfrid. 1988. If You Want to Evaluate Your Library. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
  24. Liu, Yan Quan and Douglas L. Zweizig. 2001. "The Use of National Public Library Statistics by Public Library Directors." Library Quarterly, 71(4): 467-497. https://doi.org/10.1086/603316
  25. Martensen, Anne and Lars Grønholdt. 2003. "Improving Library Users' Perceived Quality, Satisfaction and Loyalty: An Integrated Measurement and Management System." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(3): 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(03)00020-X
  26. Molyneux, Robert E. 2008. "Squeeze Play: Public Library Circulation and Budget Trends, FY1992. FY2004." Public Library Quarterly, 26(3/4): 101-107.
  27. Nelson, James A. 2006. "Marketing and Advocacy: Collaboration in Principle and Practice." Public Library Quarterly, 25(1/2): 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1300/J118v25n01_09
  28. Tabachnick, Barbara G. and Linda S. Fidell. 2013. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th Ed. International Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  29. Weiner, Sharon A. 2005. "Library Quality and Impact: Is there a Relationship between New Measures and Traditional Measures?" The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(5): 432-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.05.004

Cited by

  1. 대학도서관 서비스 품질 평가 기준 개발에 관한 연구 vol.50, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2016.50.1.049