Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지

A Study on Quality Evaluation of Discovery Central Index - the Case of EDS(EDSCO Discovery Service) -

디스커버리(Discovery) 통합색인의 품질평가에 관한 연구 - EDS를 사례로 하여 -

  • 이은주 (경일대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2014.08.25
  • Accepted : 2014.09.12
  • Published : 2014.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study intends to make a comprehensive inquiry into the meaning and limitations of Discovery, and to explore how to make full use of Discovery in library cataloging. To this end, first discussed is the meaning of Discovery, which has a variety definitions. For the quality evaluation, 5 criteria were developed on the basis of literature review. Then this study conducted the quality evaluation on the basis of previously developed 5 criteria and usefulness of Discovery in library catalogs is thoroughly discussed. Based on these, the final discussion includes strategies for Korean LIS scholars and library practitioners to consider when applying Discovery as an integrated search tool.

이 연구에서는 빠르게 도입되고 있는 디스커버리에 대한 이해를 돕고, 통합탐색도구로서 우리 도서관목록의 유용성을 증대하는데 기여할 수 있는지 그 가능성과 한계를 가늠해 보고자 한다. 구체적으로, 이 연구는 관련 문헌에 대한 조사와 분석에 근거하여, (1) 디스커버리가 등장하게 된 배경과 개념 및 유형 등 디스커버리의 실체를 살펴보고, (2) 디스커버리 통합색인의 품질평가를 위한 기준과 지표를 개발하고, (3) 도출된 기준과 지표에 따라 디스커버리에서 제공하는 통합색인의 질적 수준을 평가한 뒤, (4) 디스커버리의 도입에 앞서 우리 학계와 도서관계가 고민해야 할 과제와 취해야 할 전략에 대해서 논의하고자 한다. 이를 위해, 이 연구에서는 EDS를 사용하는 P대학도서관을 사례로 하여 371건의 표본 레코드를 추출한 뒤, 이를 대상으로 디스커버리 통합색인의 품질평가를 수행하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 구중억, 곽승진. 2007. 차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2): 61-88.(Gu, Jung-Eok and Kwak. Seung-Jin. 2007. "A Study on Next Generation OPAC's Interface and Function." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 18(2): 61-88.)
  2. 김예린, 정영미. 2011. 대학도서관의 차세대 OPAC 체크리스트 개발. 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집. 2011년 8월 26일. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원, 53-58(Kim, Ye-Rin and Jung, Young-Mi. 2011a. "The development of Evaluation Checklist for Next generation OPAC of University Library." Proceedings of the Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 53-58.)
  3. 김왕종. 2004. 통합정보시스템의 품질평가. 석사학위논문, 부산대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과.(Kim, Wang-Jong. 2004. Quality Evaluation on Integrated Information Systems. M. A. thesis. Pusan National University.)
  4. 남영준, 양지안. 2010. 대학도서관 이용자의 메타서치시스템 이용행태 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(3): 307-323.(Nam, Young-Joon and Yang, Ji-Ann. 2010. "A Study on User Information Seeking Behavior of Metasearch System in the Academic Library." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3): 307-323.)
  5. 도태현, 정영미. 2013. 대학도서관의 차세대 OPAC 기능 채택과 확산 현황. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 44(2): 197-215.(Doh, Tae-Hyun and Jung, Young-Mi. 2013. "A Study on the Next Generation OPAC Functionalities Diffusion Status and Adoption by Academic Libraries." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2): 197-215.)
  6. 심경. 2008a. 차세대 도서관 목록. 도서관문화, 49(9): 22-28.(Shim, Kyung. 2008a. "Next Generation Library Catalog." KLA Journal, 49(9): 22-28.)
  7. 심경. 2008b. 통합검색시스템. 도서관문화, 49(12): 31-38.(Shim, Kyung. 2008b. "Federated Searching." KLA Journal, 49(12): 31-38.)
  8. 윤정옥. 2010. 차세대 도서관 목록 사례의 고찰. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 41(1): 5-28.(Yoon, Cheong-Ok. 2010. "A Case Study on the Next Generation Library Catalogs." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(1): 5-28.)
  9. 윤정옥. 2013. 차세대 도서관 목록의 제반 기능에 관한 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(4): 5-23.(Yoon, Cheong-Ok. 2013. "An Analysis on the Functions of the Next Generation Library Catalog: With a Focus on SearchWorks." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(4): 5-23.)
  10. 이제환. 2002. 공동목록 DB의 품질평가와 품질관리: KERIS의 종합목록 DB를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 36(1): 61-89.(Lee, Jae-Whoan. 2002. Quality Evaluation and Management of a Shared Cataloging DB: the Case of KERIS UNICAT DB. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 36(1): 61-89.)
  11. 조종민. 2011. 차세대 전자자료 통합검색 솔루션(discovery solution) 도입 검토 사례연구. 사대도협회지, 12: 41-57.
  12. 최성진, 김태수. 2010. 연구도서관 디스커버리 환경에서의 MARC의 역할 연구. 지식처리연구, 11(1/2): 33-47.(Choi, Sung-Jin and Kim, Tae-Soo. 2010. A Study on the MARC's Role of Discovery Environment in the Library. Journal of Knowledge Processing and Management, 11(1/2): 33-47.)
  13. 홍현진. 2005. 웹 기반 데이터베이스의 품질평가 기준 개발에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 39(2): 211-235.(Hong, Hyun-Jin. 2005. "A Study on the Development of the Quality Evaluation Standard of Web-Based Databases." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(2): 211-235.)
  14. Babu, Preedip Balaji and M. Krishnamurthy. 2013. "Library Automation to Resource Discovery: a Review of Emerging Challenges." The Electronic Library, 31(4): 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-11-2011-0159
  15. Breeding, Marshall. 2007. "Thinking about your next OPAC." Computers in Libraries, 27(4): 28-30.
  16. Breeding, Marshall. 2010. "The State of the Art in Library Discovery 2010." Computers in Libraries, 30(1): 31-34.
  17. Clarke, Eddie. 2006. Resource Discovery Tools Guide and Evaluation. [cited 2014. 7. 28].
  18. Chickering, F. William and Sharon Q. Yang. 2014. "Evaluation and Comparison of Discovery Tools: An Update." Information Technology and Libraries, 33(2): 5-30.
  19. DeFelice, Barbara et al. 2009. An Evaluation of Serials Solutions Summon As a Discovery Service for the Dartmouth College Library. Dartmouth College Library.
  20. Delone, William H. and McLean, E. R. 2004. "Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model." International Journal of Electronic Comerce, 9(1): 31-47.
  21. Emanuel, Jenny and Guest Columnist. 2009. "Next Generation Catalogs : What do They do and Why Should We Care?" Reference & User Services Quarterly, 49(2): 117-120. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.49n2.117
  22. Fagan, Jody Condit et al. 2012. "Usability Test Results for a Discovery Tool in an Academic Library." Information technology and libraries, 31(1): 83-112.
  23. Foster, Anita K. and Jean B. MacDonald, 2013. "ATale of Two Discoveries : Comparing the usability of Summon and EBSCO Discovery Service." Journal of Web Lirarianship, 7(1): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2013.757936
  24. Granick, Lois. 1991. "Assuring the Quality of Information Dissemination." Information Services and Use, 11(3): 117-136.
  25. Grophy, Jan and David Bawden. 2005. "Is Google enough? Comparison of an Internet Search Engine with Academic Library Resources." Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 57(6): 498-512.
  26. Nagy, Andrew. 2009. "A Conversation With Karen Schneider: VuFind and Summon." [cited 2014. 7. 20].
  27. NISO ODI Working Group. ODI Survey Report: Reflections and Perspectives on Discovery Services. [cited 2014. 7. 17].
  28. OCLC. 2005. Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
  29. OCLC. 2010. Perceptions of Libraries, 2010: Context and Community. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
  30. Philip, Martin. 2010. Do Students Wants a One-stop-shop to Help Them Navigate Their Way Around the Maze of Library Resources? M. A. thesis. The university of sheffield.
  31. Pradhan, Dinesh R., Kruti Trivedi and Jagdish Arora. 2011. "Searching Online Resources in New Discovery Environment: A state-of-the-Art review." Proceedings of the 8th International Caliber, 132-145.
  32. Vaughan, Jason. 2011. "Web Scale Discovery: What and Why?" Library Technology Reports, 47(1): 5-11.
  33. Vaughan, Jason. 2012. "Investigations into Library Web Scale Discovery Service", Information Technology & Libraries, 31(1): 32-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2012.648093
  34. Way, Dong. 2010. "The Impact of Web-scale Discovery on the Use of a Library Collection." Serials Review, 36(4): 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2010.10765320
  35. Williams, Sarah C. and Anita K. Foster. 2011. "Promise Fulfilled? An EBSCO Discovery Service Usability Study." Journal of Web Librarianship, 5(3): 179-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2011.597590
  36. Yang, Sharon Q. and Kurt Wagner. 2010. "Evaluating and Comparing Discovery Tools: How Close are We Towards Next Generation Catalog?" Library Hi Tech, 28(4): 690-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096312
  37. Yang, Sharon Q. and Melissa A. Hofmann. 2010. "Evaluating and Comparing Discovery Tools: How Close AreWe Towards Next Generation Catalog?" Library Hi Tech, 28(4): 690-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096312
  38. A도서관 디스커버리 업무담당 사서. 2014. 7. 28, 부산, [인터뷰].