DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of an Instruction Using Geologic Planar Figures on High School Students' Ability of Spatial Visualization and Geologic Spatial Ability

지질 전개도를 활용한 수업이 고등학생의 공간 시각화 능력과 지질 공간 능력에 미치는 영향

  • Park, Jaeyong (Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Kiyoung (Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University)
  • 박재용 (강원대학교 과학교육학부) ;
  • 이기영 (강원대학교 과학교육학부)
  • Received : 2015.04.10
  • Accepted : 2015.06.19
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an instruction using geologic planar figures on high school students' ability of spatial visualization and geologic spatial ability and also to explore its applicability as an instructional strategy through the investigation of students' perception about the instruction using mixed methodology. For this purpose, we developed 10 planar figures of geologic structures (2 horizontal layers, 2 vertical layers, 4 angular layers, 1 fault, and 1 fold), and tested students' spatial visualization ability and geologic spatial ability before and after the implementation in class. In addition, in order to investigate students' perception on the instruction, we conducted quantitative research using questionnaires comprised of the cognitive and the affective domain, and followed by focus group interview that was conducted to obtain deeper understanding of their perception. Findings revealed that the instruction using geologic planar figures was effective to enhance spatial visualization ability and geologic spatial ability. It was also helpful for students to enhance their ability to perceive the spatial configuration of the geologic structures as well as the ability to penetrate visually into the images of the structures. The results of the students' perception on the instruction showed that the students recognized the instruction using geologic planar figures as a strongly positive teaching method both in the cognitive and affective domain. We concluded that geologic planar figures could be used as an effective tool for the lesson of 'mapping and interpreting of geological map', and be highly applicable for the advanced class in high schools.

이 연구의 목적은 지질 전개도를 활용한 수업이 고등학생들의 공간 시각화 능력 및 지질 공간 능력에 미치는 효과를 살펴보고, 이 수업에 대한 학생들의 인식을 혼합연구 방법으로 조사함으로써 지질 전개도를 활용한 수업의 적용 가능성을 탐색하는 것이다. 이를 위해 10개의 지질 전개도(수평층 2개, 수직층 2개, 경사층 4개, 단층 1개, 습곡 1개)를 개발하였고, 지질 전개도를 활용한 수업 실시 전후에 학생들의 공간 시각화 능력과 지질 공간 능력을 검사하였다. 또한, 이 수업에 대한 학생들의 인식을 조사하기 위하여 인지적 영역과 정의적 영역으로 구성된 설문지를 이용하여 양적 연구를 실시한 후, 이를 보완하기 위한 질적 연구로 참가 학생에 대한 포커스 그룹 인터뷰를 진행하였다. 연구 결과, 지질 전개도를 활용한 수업은 공간 시각화 능력과 지질 공간 능력을 향상시키는 데 효과적인 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 이 수업은 학생들의 지질 구조 공간 배치에 대한 인식 능력 및 시각 투시 능력을 향상시키는 데 도움을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 지질 전개도를 활용한 수업에 대해 학생들의 인식을 조사한 결과, 학생들은 인지적 영역과 정의적 영역 모두에서 상당히 긍정적으로 평가하고 있었다. 이 연구에서 개발된 지질 전개도는 '지질도의 작성과 해석'에 관한 수업을 위해 효과적인 도구로 사용될 수 있으며, 일반 고등학교의 지질 수업에서 과학 성취도가 높은 학생들을 대상으로 한 수업에의 적용 가능성이 높을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ben-Chaim, D., Lappan, G., and Houang, R.T., 1986, Development and analysis of a spatial visualization test for middle school boys and girls. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 659-669. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1986.63.2.659
  2. Ben-Chaim, D., Lappan, G., and Houang, R.T., 1988, The effect of instruction on spatial visualization skills of middle school boys and girls. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 51-71. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312025001051
  3. Black, A.A., 2005, Spatial ability and earth science conceptual understanding. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 402-414. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.402
  4. Cohen, N., 2003, Curved solids nets. Proceedings of PME Conference, 27, 229-236.
  5. Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H., and Derman, D., 1976, Manual from kit factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NJ, USA, 149-152 p.
  6. Felder, R.M., 1993, Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23, 286-290.
  7. Fossen, H., 2010, Structural geology. Cambridge University Press, NY, USA, 2 p. (translated by Kim, Y.S., 2013, Sigma Press)
  8. Grossner, K., 2012, Finding the spatial in order to teach it, in Kastens, K.A., and Manduca, C.A. (eds.), Earth and Mind II: A Synthesis of Research on Thinking and Learning in the Geosciences: Geological Society of America Special Paper 486, 87-89.
  9. Guay, R., 1976, Purdue spatial visualization tests. Purdue Research Foundation, IN, USA.
  10. Hemler, D. and Repine, T., 2006, Teachers doing science: An authentic geology research experience for teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 93-102. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-54.2.93
  11. Kali, Y. and Orion, N., 1996, Spatial abilities of highschool students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 369-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199604)33:4<369::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-Q
  12. Kali, Y. and Orion, N., 1997, Software for assisting highschool students in the spatial perception of geological structures. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 10-21.
  13. Kang, J.M., Shim, K.C., Dong, H.K., Gim, W.H., Son, J.W., Kwack, D.O., Oh, K.H., and Kim, Y.J., 2014, Practical use of the classroom response system (CRS) for diagnostic and formative assessments in a high school life science class. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34, 273-283. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.3.0273
  14. Kastens, K.A., Manduca, C.A., Cervato, C., Frodeman, R., Goodwin, C., Liben, L.S., Mogk, D.W., Spangler, T.C., Stillings, N.A., and Trrus, S., 2009, How geoscientists think and learn. EOS, 90, 265-266. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009EO310001
  15. King, H., 2006, Understanding spatial literacy: Cognitive and curriculum perspectives. Planet, 17, 26-28.
  16. Lee, K.Y., 2013, The effects of flash panorama-based virtual field trips on middle school students' spatial visualization ability, conceptual understanding, and perceptions. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 34, 162-172. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2013.34.2.162
  17. Lee, M.Y., 2014, A study on programs using a net for the development of spatial visualization ability of mathematically gifted elementary students. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, Korea, 2 p. (in Korean)
  18. Lee, W.S., Kim, H.S., and Kim, H., 2004, Development and effects of program for enhancement of spatial abilities in the units related to geology of high school students. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 25, 391-401. (in Korean)
  19. Libarkin, J.C. and Brick, C., 2002, Research methodologies in science education: Visualization and the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50, 449-455. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-50.4.449
  20. Liben, L.S. and Titus, S.J., 2012, The importance of spatial thinking for geoscience education: Insights from the crossroads of geoscience and cognitive science. in Kastens, K.A., and Manduca, C.A. (eds.), Earth and Mind II: A Synthesis of Research on Thinking and Learning in the Geosciences: Geological Society of America Special Paper 486, 51-70.
  21. Lim, S.K., Han, S.H., Lee, Y.J., Chung, W.W., and Kim, J.W., 1999, Development and application of a geological mapping experimental kit. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 20, 587-594. (in Korean)
  22. Linn, M. and Petersen, A.C., 1985, Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467
  23. Lohman, D.F., 1979, Spatial ability: A review and reanalysis of correlational literature. Technical Report, 8, 25-27.
  24. Lord, T., 1987, A look at spatial abilities in undergraduate women science majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 757-767. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240808
  25. Lord, T., 2006, Enhancing the visual-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 395-405.
  26. Maeng, S., Lee, K., Park, Y.S., Lee, J.A., and Oh, H., 2014, Development and validation of a learning progression for astronomical systems using ordered multiple-choice items. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34, 703-718. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.8.0703
  27. Mathewson, J.H., 1999, Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science and Education, 83, 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<33::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Z
  28. McGee, M.G., 1979, Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889-918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.889
  29. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, 2009, High school science curriculum guide book. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea, 274 p. (in Korean)
  30. National Research Council (NRC), 2006, Learning to think spatially. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 12 p, 25 p.
  31. Newcombe, N.S., 2012, Two ways to help students with spatial thinking in geoscience, in Kastens, K.A., and Manduca, C.A. (eds.), Earth and Mind II: A Synthesis of Research on Thinking and Learning in the Geosciences: Geological Society of America Special Paper 486, 85-86.
  32. Olkun, S., 2003, Making connections: Improving spatial abilities with engineering drawing activities. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1-10.
  33. Pallrand, G.J. and Seeber, F., 1984, Spatial ability and achievement in introductory physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210508
  34. Park, J.Y. and Lee, K.Y, 2012, The impact of grouping methods on free inquiry implementation: The case of two middle schools adopting different grouping methods. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32, 686-702. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.686
  35. Park, S.S., 2012, Assessing Korean middle school students' spatial ability: Comparison between gifted students and general students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22, 371-386. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.2.371
  36. Pellegrino, J.W., David, L.A., and Valerie J. Shute, V.J., 1983, Understanding spatial ability. Educational Psychologist, 19, 239-253.
  37. Piburn, M.D., Reynolds, S.J., Leedy, D.E., McAuliffe, C.M., Birk, J.P., and Johnson, J.K., 2002, The hidden earth: Visualization of geologic features and their subsurface geometry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA, April 7-10, 2002. 1-4 p.
  38. Stylianou, D.A., Leikin, R., and Silver, E.A., 1999, Exploring students' solution strategies in solving a spatial visualization problem involving nets. Proceedings of PME Conference, 23, 241-248.
  39. Titus, S. and Horsman, E., 2009, Characterizing and improving spatial visualization skills. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57, 242-254. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3559671
  40. Tomlinson, C.A., 2001, How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.), ASCD, VA, USA, 133 p. (translated by Hwang, Y.H. and Cho, Y.I., 2008, Kyoyookkwahaksa)