Child Health Nursing Research

Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing (한국아동간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Reliability and Validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric in Korean Nursing Students

임상판단 평가도구의 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증

  • Shim, Kaka (East-West Nursing Research Institute, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Shin, Hyunsook (College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University)
  • 심가가 (경희대학교 동서간호학연구소) ;
  • 신현숙 (경희대학교 간호과학대학)
  • Received : 2015.02.17
  • Accepted : 2015.04.14
  • Published : 2015.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric for use with Korean nursing students. Methods: A methodological study was used to validate the rubric developed by Lasater to assess clinical judgment during nursing simulation. Participants were 34 nursing students at K University in Seoul. Between February and May, 2012, analysis was done of 91 video clips recording performance during simulation. Results: Findings showed reliability and validity of the rubric. For internal consistency, Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ score was .884 and intraclass correlation coefficient was .839, which established reliability. The rubric was validated using the exploratory factor analysis and content validity. The content validity score was 83%, establishing the appropriateness and readiness of the tool. Factor analysis showed that noticing, responding, and reflecting domains had Eigen values of 2.669, 1.991, and 2.912, respectively and were bound, but unlike the original tool in which four factors noticing, interpretation, responding, and reflecting domains were bound. Conclusion: Results of the study indicate that the rubric shows acceptable reliability and validity in Korean nursing students. This evaluation tool for nursing simulation allows nursing faculty to objectively evaluate students' clinical judgment as well as students to reflect on their clinical judgment process during simulation.

Keywords

References

  1. Adamson, K. A. (2011). Assessing the reliability of simulation evaluation instruments used in nursing education: A test of concept study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington State University, Washington, USA.
  2. Adamson, K. A., Gubrud, P., Sideras, S., & Lasater, K. (2012). Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric: Three approaches. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(2), 66-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20111130-03
  3. Cannon-Diehl, M. R. (2009). Simulation in healthcare and nursing: State of the science. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 32(2), 128-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0b013e3181a27e0f
  4. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
  5. Davis, A. H., & Kimble, L. P. (2011). Human patient simulation evaluation rubrics for nursing education: Measuring the essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(11), 605-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20110715-01
  6. Haskvitz, L. M., & Koop, E. C. (2004). Students struggling in clinical? A new role for the patient simulator. Journal of Nursing Education, 43(4), 181-184.
  7. Jeffries, P. R. (2005). Simulation in nursing education. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
  8. Kardong-Edgren, S., Adamson, K. A., & Fitzgerald, C. (2010). A review of currently published evaluation instruments for human patient simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6(1), 25-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.08.004
  9. Kim, M. W. (2006). Development of Objectives in Nursing Clinical Education based on the Nursing Core Competencies. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 36(2), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2006.36.2.389
  10. Kim, S. H., Nam, H. A., & Kim, M. O. (2014). Critical thinking disposition, problem solving process, and simulation-based assessment of clinical competence of nursing students in pediatric nursing. Child Health Nursing Research, 20(4), 294-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2014.20.4.294
  11. Kwon, I. S. (2002). An analysis on clinical education of pediatric nursing. Korean Journal of Child Health Nursing, 8(3), 344-356.
  12. Lasater, K. (2007). Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), 496-503.
  13. Lasater, K. (2011). Clinical judgment: The last frontier for evaluation. Nurse Education in Practice, 11(2), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.013
  14. Lee, J. H., & Choi, M. N. (2011). Evaluation of effects of a clinical reasoning course among undergraduate nursing students. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 23(1), 1-9.
  15. Lee, J. H., Kim, S. S., Yeo, K. S., Cho, S. J., & Kim, H. L. (2009). Experiences among undergraduate nursing students on high-fidelity simulation education: A focus group study. Korean Academy Society of Nursing Education, 15(2), 183-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2009.15.2.183
  16. Mariani, B., Cantrell, M. A., Meakim, C., P., & Dreifuerst, K. T. (2012). Structured debriefing and students' clinical judgment abilities in simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(5), e147-e155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2011.11.009
  17. McCaughey, C. S., & Traynor, M. K. (2010). The role of simulation in nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 30(8), 827-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.03.005
  18. Moskal, B. M., & Leydens, J. A. (2000). Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(10), 71-81.
  19. Nehring, W. M., & Lashley, F. R. (2004). Current use and opinions regarding human patient simulators in nursing education: An international survey. Nursing Education Perspectives, 25(5), 244-248.
  20. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  21. Rauen, C. A. (2004). Simulation as a teaching strategy for nursing education and orientation in cardiac surgery. Critical Care Nurse, 24(3), 46-51.
  22. Rhodes, M. L., & Curran, C. (2005). Use of the human patient simulator to teach clinical judgment skills in a baccalaureate nursing program. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 23(5), 256-262. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024665-200509000-00009
  23. Seo, Y. O., Ahn, Y. H., & Park, K. S. (2009). Content analysis of experience of nursing students in clinical judgment during nursing practicum. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 21(2), 245-256.
  24. Shin, H., & Kim, M. J. (2014). Evaluation of an integrated simulation courseware in pediatric nursing practicum. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(10), 589-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140922-05
  25. Shin, H., Park, C. G., & Shim, K. (2015). The Korean version of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric: A validation study. Nurse Education Today, 35(1), 68-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.009
  26. Shin, H., Shim, K., & Lee, Y. N. (2010). Nursing activities identified through pediatric nursing simulation. Journal of Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing, 19(2), 111-119. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2013.19.2.111
  27. Shin, H., Shim, K., Lee, Y. N., & Quinn, L. (2014). Validation of a new assessment tool for a pediatric nursing simulation module. Journal of Nursing Education. 53(11), 623-629. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20141023-04
  28. Sideras, S. (2007). An Examination of the Construct Validity of a Clinical Judgment Evaluation Tool in the Setting of High-Fidelity Simulation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
  29. Suzie, K. E., & Cynthia, F. (2010). A review of currently published evaluation instruments for human patient simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6(1), 25-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.08.004
  30. Tanner, C. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204-211.

Cited by

  1. 시뮬레이션 실습에서 학습성과 평가도구의 신뢰도 및 타당도 -여성건강 간호학 실습에서 비판적 추론과정을 통한 간호과정 적용(학습성과)을 중심으로- vol.18, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2017.18.4.154
  2. 시뮬레이션 교육에서 성찰질문과 글쓰기를 이용한 디브리핑의 효과 - 복부수술 후 환자 간호에서 vol.23, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2017.23.4.463
  3. 간호시뮬레이션에서 나타나는 임상판단과정 분석 vol.19, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2018.19.9.130
  4. S-PBL의 연계순서에 따른 간호대학생의 학습성과 비교: 무작위 교차설계 vol.49, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2019.49.1.92
  5. Effect of structured pre-simulation preparation and briefing on student’s self-confidence, clinical judgment, and clinical decision-making in simulation vol.55, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2019.1641420
  6. Effectiveness of neonatal emergency nursing education through simulation training: Flipped learning based on Tanner’s Clinical Judgement Model vol.8, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.748
  7. 간호대학생의 Virtual 시뮬레이션 실습 및 High fidelity 시뮬레이션 실습교육 경험 분석: 혼합연구방법 적용 vol.27, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2021.27.3.227