Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on the Determining Factors of Satisfaction for Environmental Improvement of Trails around Recreation Park - Focused on Suseong Recreation Park in Daegu -

유원지 주변 산책로의 환경개선을 위한 이용만족도 결정요인 분석 - 대구광역시 수성유원지를 대상으로 -

  • Received : 2015.07.02
  • Accepted : 2015.09.03
  • Published : 2015.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze users' behavior and facility satisfaction and to suggest the practical solution plans for environmental improvement of trails in Suseong recreation park in Daegu. Therefore, satisfaction factor analysis on trails was carried out based on a field and questionnaire survey in Suseong recreation park. First, from users' behavior, 48% of users visited Suseong recreation park for walking. The greatest response to number of visits was once or twice a week, and average use time per visit was 80.4 minutes. In terms of trails, the greater responses to the number of visits were once(38.1%) or more than 5 times(23.8%), and average use time was 45.4 minutes. According to the results from the analysis of facility satisfaction, management condition, length, slope, and adjacent natural landscape of trails were evaluated at a satisfaction rate higher than 3.4 points. However, water pollution, and number of exits and parking lots were analyzed at a low rate of 2.75 and 2.78 points, respectively. In terms of analyzing determining factors of facility satisfaction for trails, use of facilities, walking convenience, surrounding landscapes, amenities, and noise had a significantly positive effect on satisfaction. In particular, walking convenience was the highest effect factor; its standardized coefficient was 0.533. The findings from this study can contribute to the improvement of the physical environment for trails of Suseong recreation park and provide basic data for plan and maintenance of similar waterside trails.

본 연구는 대구광역시의 수성유원지 이용자들을 대상으로 이용행태 및 시설 만족도를 분석하여 수성유원지 산책로의 환경개선을 위한 실질적인 방안을 제안하고자 하였다. 이에 수성유원지에 대한 현장조사 및 설문조사를 토대로 유원지 내 산책로에 대한 만족요인 분석을 실시하였다. 우선, 이용자들의 이용행태를 살펴보면, 이용자의 48.0%가 산책을 목적으로 수성유원지를 방문하였으며, 주당 평균 1~2회 이용비율이 가장 높았고, 1회 평균이용시간은 80.4분으로 분석되었다. 산책로의 경우 주당 1회 이용과 5회 이상의 이용이 각각 38.1%와 23.8%로 높게 나타났으며, 평균 이용시간은 45.4분으로 조사되었다. 시설요소에 대한 만족도 분석결과, 산책로의 관리상태, 노선 길이, 경사도, 주변의 자연경관 등이 3.4점 이상의 높은 만족도를 보인 반면, 유원지의 수질오염도와 출입구 개수 및 주차장은 각각 2.75점, 2.78점의 낮은 만족도로 평가되었다. 산책로의 전체 만족도에 대한 결정요인을 분석한 결과, 이용시설, 보행 편의성, 주변경관, 쾌적성, 소음 등의 인자가 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 주는 것으로 분석되었다. 특히, 보행 편의성 인자의 표준화 계수가 0.533으로 가장 높게 나타나, 산책로의 이용만족도에 가장 큰 영향을 주는 요인으로 평가되었다. 이러한 결과는 향후 수성유원지 산책로의 환경개선뿐만 아니라, 유사 수변산책로 계획과 유지관리에 필요한 기초자료를 제공할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bourdeaudhuij, I. D., J. F. Sallis and B. E. Saelens(2003) Environmental correlates of physical activity in a sample of Belgian adults. American Journal of Health Promotion 18(1): 83-92. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.83
  2. Choi, D. S., J. W. Moon and S. H. Kim(2012) An assessment on the urban riverfront in Shincheon, Daegu: Focused on a universal design concept. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(2): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.2.001
  3. Daegu metropolitan city(2010) The Status of Park and Recreation Park in 2009.
  4. Han, B. H., J. H. Bae, I. S. Ahn and K. J. Lee(2009) A trail plan for at-risk walkers in mountainous urban park: a focus on Umyen nature park. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(6): 22-33.
  5. Jang, B. W.(2014) Ttukseom Resort Station Renovation. Master Thesis, Konkuk University.
  6. Jang, M. S.(2008) An Evaluation on User's Satisfaction in Waterfront Park. Master Thesis, Yeungnam University.
  7. Jang, M. S. and B. M. Jang(2010) An evaluation on visitor satisfaction in waterfront park. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 38(3): 41-52.
  8. Jung, S. G. and W. S. Lee(2008) Establishing a green space management zone for an environmental city: Focusing on Changwon city. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 35(6): 64-73.
  9. Kim, B. K., H. Y. Shin and J. T. Kim(2005) Illuminance levels of walkway in Cheonggyecheon. Proceeding of the 2005 Korean Institute of Illuminating and Electrical Installation Engineers Fall Conference 39-44.
  10. Kim, H. J.(2010) Citizen's Needs and Uses on Greenspace of Waterside Park: Focusing on Bong-Mu Park and Su-seoung Resort in Daegu. Master Thesis, Keimyung University.
  11. Kim, J. S.(2010) Visitors' Behavior and Ealuation of Tail in Arboretum. Master Thesis, Chungnam National University.
  12. Kim, J. S., D. K. Oh and S. B. Kim(2010) Visitors' evaluation of trail in the Hanbat arboretum: A case importance-satisfaction analysis. Journal of Korean Forest Society 99(3): 404-413.
  13. Kim, M. S., J. E. Park, Y. K. Choi and S. Y. Jung(2008) Strategy of multi-purpose corridors for human health, culture and ecology. Research report, KRIHS.
  14. Kim, S. B. and C. W. Lee(2010) Citizen's needs and uses on greenspace of waterside park in Daegu. Proceeding of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture Fall Conference 7-11.
  15. Kim, S. B., Y. S. Ryu and J. Y. Lee(2007) Analysis of the green park preference of residents adjacent to industrial area. Journal of The Korean Environmental Sciences Society 16(1): 95-102.
  16. Lee, H. S.(2002) SPSS 10.0 Guide in Korean. Seoul: Bobmunsa.
  17. Lee, J. A., J. J. Kim, M. Yoo, E. Y. Kim, and J. H. Chon(2010) Satisfaction and anticipated benefits on a community based riparian greenway: Focused on Tancheon greenway. Seoul Studies 11(3): 15-28.
  18. Lee, S. M.(2010) The study on the Characteristics of Design for Waterfront in the Downtown Area. Master Thesis, Hongik University.
  19. Lee, W. S.(2010) The Assessment of Green Environment and Establishment of Planning Direction for the Sustainable Urban Space. Doctor Thesis, Kyungpook National University.
  20. Lee, W. S.(2012) Selection of indicator and establishment of system for a functional assessment of green space: Focused on forest green space. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 15(5): 31-48. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2012.15.5.031
  21. Lim, H. W.(2010) Assessment on the Level of Satisfaction depending on the Character of the Use for Pleasure Ground. Master Thesis, Cheongju University.
  22. Moon, J. W., S. H. Kim and D. S. Choi(2011) The application of the universal design concept to the pedestrian space at K university campus. Journal of Korea Planning Association 46(2): 273-285.
  23. Park, S. H., Y. M. Choi and H. L. Seo(2008) Neighborhood Walkability Indicators for Health Promotive Community Design. Research report, Korea Health Promotion Foundation.
  24. Park, Y. E.(2005) Preferences of the Arch Bridge Shape for a Urban Landscape Improvement. Master Thesis, Kyungpook National University.
  25. Ro, U. A.(2013) A Study on Water-Friendly Environment Facilities Design of Anyang Stream, Considering User's Behaviors. Master thesis, Kookmin University.
  26. Shin, D. J. and J. Y. Son(2008) Participants' motivation of fishing village tourism: focusing on the fishing village experience Tourism of East Coast. Korea Journal of Tourism Research 32(3): 255-273.
  27. Shin, H. T. and J. H. Yoo(2003) Satisfaction analysis by utilization form of pleasure ground. Journal of Research Institute of Industrial Technology 14(3): 29-35.
  28. Son, S. R. and B. G. Yoon(2002) A study on neighborhood and transition rule of cellular automata with application Fuzzy-AHP. Journal of Korea Planning Association 37(4): 59-81.
  29. Sung, H. C. and J. Y. Shin(2005) Strategies to improve parks' accessibility in city: Focus on Gyeonggi-do region. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 33(2): 83-91.
  30. Suseong District Office(2012) Report of the Basic and Detailed Design for Ecological Restoration on Suseong Lake.
  31. Um, S. G.(2008) Study on Appraisal of Urban Open Space based on Usability: with Emphasis on New Metropolitan Towns. Doctor Thesis, University of Seoul.
  32. Yang, B. E.(1980) Facilities and design of recreation park. Urban Affairs 15(8): 52-65.
  33. http://tour.go.kr