Journal of Ginseng Research

The Korean Society of Ginseng (고려인삼학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of cultivation ages and modes on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere soil of Panax ginseng

  • Xiao, Chunping (Cultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province and Ministry of Science and Technology, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University) ;
  • Yang, Limin (Cultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province and Ministry of Science and Technology, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University) ;
  • Zhang, Lianxue (Cultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province and Ministry of Science and Technology, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University) ;
  • Liu, Cuijing (Cultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province and Ministry of Science and Technology, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University) ;
  • Han, Mei (Cultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province and Ministry of Science and Technology, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2015.02.12
  • Accepted : 2015.04.10
  • Published : 2016.01.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Panax ginseng cannot be cultivated on the same land consecutively for an extended period, and the underlying mechanism regarding microorganisms is still being explored. Methods: Polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) and BIO-LOG methods were used to evaluate the microbial genetic and functional diversity associated with the P. ginseng rhizosphere soil in various cultivation ages and modes. Results: The analysis of microbial diversity using PCR-DGGE showed that microbial communities were significantly variable in composition, of which six bacterial phyla and seven fungal classes were detected in P. ginseng soil. Among them, Proteobacteria and Hypocreales dominated. Fusarium oxysporum, a soilborne pathogen, was found in all P. ginseng soil samples except R0. The results from functional diversity suggested that the microbial metabolic diversity of fallow soil abandoned in 2003was the maximum and transplanted soil was higher than direct-seeding soil and the forest soil uncultivated P. ginseng, whereas the increase in cultivation ages in the same mode led to decreases in microbial diversity in P. ginseng soil. Carbohydrates, amino acids, and polymers were the main carbon sources utilized. Furthermore, the microbial diversity index and multivariate comparisons indicated that the augmentation of P. ginseng cultivation ages resulted in decreased bacterial diversity and increased fungal diversity, whereas microbial diversity was improved strikingly in transplanted soil and fallow soil abandoned for at least one decade. Conclusion: The key factors for discontinuous P. ginseng cultivation were the lack of balance in rhizosphere microbial communities and the outbreak of soilborne diseases caused by the accumulation of its root exudates.

Keywords

References

  1. Jung J, Kim KH, Yang K, Bang KH, Yang TJ. Practical application of DNA markers for high-throughput authentication of Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolius from commercial ginseng products. J Ginseng Res 2014;38:123-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2013.11.017
  2. Zhang HY, Xue QH. Research progress in control of continuous cropping obstacle in Panax ginseng. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi 2010;22:68-71.
  3. Zhang LX, Chen CB, Wang YP, Xu SQ, Chang C. Study on discontinuous cultivating of Panax ginseng and its workable solution. J Jilin Agric Univ 2008;30:481-5.
  4. Li Y, Ying YX, Zhao DY, Ding WL. Microbial community diversity analysis of Panax ginseng rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil using randomly amplified ' method. Open J Genet 2012;2:95-102. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojgen.2012.22014
  5. Yang LM, Chen CB, Wang XQ, Zhang LX, Tian YX. Ecological restoration and reused modes of old ginseng land in the Changbai mountainous area and its existing problems. J Jilin Agric Univ 2004;26:546-9.
  6. Larkin RP. Characterization of soil microbial communities under different potato cropping systems by microbial population dynamics, substrate utilization, and fatty acid profiles. Soil Biol Biochem 2003;35:1451-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00240-2
  7. Zuppinger-Dingley D, Schmid B, Petermann JS, Yadav V, De Deyn GB, Flynn DF. Selection for niche differentiation in plant communities increases biodiversity effects. Nature 2014;515:108-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13869
  8. Wu FZ, Wang XZ, Xue CY. Effect of cinnamic acid on soil microbial characteristics in the cucumber rhizosphere. Eur J Soil Biol 2009;45:356-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.04.001
  9. Urashima Y, Sonoda T, Fujita Y, Uragami A. Application of PCR-denaturing-gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) method to examine microbial community structure in asparagus fields with growth inhibition due to continuous cropping. Microbes Environ 2012;27:43-8. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME11222
  10. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivated. Microbiol Rev 1995;59:143-69.
  11. Sang MK, Chun SC, Kim KD. Biological control of Phytophthora blight of pepper by antagonistic rhizobacteria selected from a sequential screening procedure. Biol Control 2008;46:424-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.03.017
  12. Hoang VA, Kim YJ, Nguyen NL, Yang DC. Brachybacterium ginsengisoli sp. nov., isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:3063-8. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.058388-0
  13. Johri BN, Sharma A, Virdi JS. Rhizobacterial diversity in India and its influence on soil and plant health. Adv Biochem Eng Biot 2003;84:49-89.
  14. Lv XC, Weng X, Zhang W, Rao PF, Ni L. Microbial diversity of traditional fermentation starters for Hong Qu glutinous rice wine as determined by PCR-mediated DGGE. Food Control 2012;28:426-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.025
  15. Ma WK, Siciliano SD, Germida JJ. A PCR-DGGE method for detecting arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in cultivated soil. Soil Biol Biochem 2005;37:1589-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.01.020
  16. Matsuyama T, Nakajima Y, Matsuya K, Ikenaga M, Asakawa S, Kimura M. Bacterial community in plant residues in a Japanese paddy field estimated by RFLP and DGGE analyses. Soil Biol Biochem 2007;39:463-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.08.016
  17. Giraffa G. Studying the dynamics of microbial populations during food fermentation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2004;28:251-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2003.10.005
  18. Ercolini D. PCR-DGGE fingerprinting: novel strategies for detection of microbes in food. J Microbiol Meth 2004;56:297-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2003.11.006
  19. Garland JL, Mills AL, Young JS. Relative effectiveness of kinetic analysis vs single point readings for classifying environmental samples based on community-level physiological profiles (CLPP). Soil Biol Biochem 2001;33:1059-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00011-6
  20. Rogers BF, Tate III RL. Temporal analysis of the soil microbial community along a toposequence in Pineland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 2001;33:1389-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00044-X
  21. Vendan RT, Lee SH, Yu YJ, Rhee YH. Analysis of bacterial community in the ginseng soil using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Indian J Microbiol 2012;52:286-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-011-0193-3
  22. Ying YX, Ding WL, Zhou YQ, Li Y. Influence of Panax ginseng continuous cropping on metabolic function of soil microbial communities. Chin Herb Med 2012;4:329-34.
  23. Inceoglu O, Hoogwout EF, Hill P, van Elsas JD. Effect of DNA extraction method on the apparent microbial diversity of soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010;76:3378-82. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02715-09
  24. Inceoglu O, Salles JF, van Overbeek L, van Elsas JD. Effect of plant genotype and growth stage on the $\beta$-proteobacterial community associated with different potato cultivars in two fields. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010;76:3675-84. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00040-10
  25. Luo J, Ran W, Hu J, Yang XM, Xu YC, Shen QR. Application of bio-organic fertilizer significantly affected fungal diversity of soil. Soil Biol Biochem 2010;74:2039-48.
  26. Lyautey E, Lacoste B, Hage LT, Rols JL, Garabetian F. Analysis of bacterial diversity in river biofilms using16S rDNA PCR-DGGE: methodological settings and fingerprints interpretation. Water Res 2005;39:380-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.09.025
  27. Schutter M, Dick R. Shift in substrate utilization potential and structure of soil microbial communities in response to carbon substrates. Soil Biol Biochem 2001;33:1481-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00057-8
  28. Garland JL, Mills AL. Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization. Appl Environ Microbiol 1991;57:2351-9.
  29. Zabinski CA, Gannon JE. Effects of recreational impacts on soil microbial communities. Environ Manage 1997;21:233-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900022
  30. Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Ebblewhite N, Dobson G. Soil microbial community structure: effects of substrate loading rates. Soil Biol Biochem 1999;31:145-53.
  31. Ferreira E, Dusi AN, Xavier GR, Rumjanek NG. Rhizosphere bacterial communities of potato cultivars evaluated through PCR-DGGE profiles. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 2008;43:605-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2008000500008
  32. Berman JJ. Taxonomic guide to infectious diseases: understanding the biologic classes of pathogenic organisms. 1st ed. Salt Lake City, UT: Academic Press; 2012. p. 25-31.
  33. Marilley L, Aragno M. Phylogenetic diversity of bacterial communities differing in degree of proximity of Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens roots. Appl Soil Ecol 1999;13:127-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(99)00028-1
  34. Berggren I, Alstrom S, van Vuurde JWL, Martensson AM. Rhizoplane colonisation of peas by Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae and a deleterious Pseudomonas putida. Fems Microbiol Ecol 2005;52:71-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.10.013
  35. Poltia MA, Aparicioa JD, Benimelic CS, Amorosoa MJ. Role of Actinobacteria in bioremediation. In: Surajit D, editor. Microbial biodegradation and bioremediation. London: Elsevier; 2014. p. 269-86.
  36. Priyadharsini P, Dhanasekaran D. Diversity of soil allelopathic Actinobacteria in Tiruchirappalli district, Tamilnadu, India. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 2015;14:54-60.
  37. Van der Does HC, Lievens B, Claes L, Houterman PM, Cornelissen BJC, Rep M. The presence of a virulence locus discriminates Fusarium oxysporum isolates causing tomato wilt from other isolates. Environ Microbiol 2008;10:1475-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01561.x
  38. Michielse CB, Rep M. Pathogen profile update: Fusarium oxysporum. Mol Plant Pathol 2009;10:311-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00538.x
  39. Ouyang S, Park G, Atamian HS, Han CS, Stajich JE, Kaloshian I, Borkovich KA. MicroRNAs suppress NB domain genes in tomato that confer resistance to Fusarium oxysporum. PLoS Pathog 2014;10:e1004464. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004464
  40. Dong Y, Dong K, Zheng Y, Tang L, Yang ZX. Faba bean fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum) control and its mechanism in different wheat varieties and faba bean intercropping system. Chin J of Appl Ecol 2014;25:1979-87.
  41. Fu M, Li R, Guo C, Pang M, Liu Y, Dong J. Natural incidence of Fusarium species and fumonisins B1 and B2 associated with maize kernels from nine provinces in China in 2012. Food Addit Contam A 2014;6:1-9.
  42. Gaspar YM, McKenna JA, McGinness BS, Hinch J, Poon S, Connelly AA, Anderson MA, Heath RL. Field resistance to Fusarium oxysporum and Verticillium dahliae in transgenic cotton expressing the plant defensin NaD1. J Exp Bot 2014;65:1541-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru021
  43. Leslie JF, Summerell BA. Techniques for recovering Fusarium. In: Leslie JF, Summerell BA, editors. The Fusarium laboratory manual. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2006. p. 15-20.
  44. Wang GH, Liu JJ, Qi XN, Jin J, Wang Y, Liu XB. Effects of fertilization on bacterial community structure and function in a black soil of Dehui region estimated by Biolog and PCR-DGGE methods. Acta Ecol Sin 2008;28:220-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2032(08)60023-2
  45. Wang Y, Ou ZY, Zheng H, Wang XK, Chen FL, Zeng J. Carbon metabolism of soil microbial communities of restores forests in Southern China. J Soil Sediment 2011;11:789-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0352-5
  46. Yue BB, Li X, Zhang HH, Jin WW, Xu N, Zhu WX, Sun GY. Soil microbial diversity and community structure under continuous Tobacco cropping. Soils 2013;45:116-9.
  47. Ma K, Zhang L, Du Q, Song NP. Effect of potato continuous cropping on soil microorganism community structure and function. J Soil Water Conserv 2010;24:229-33.
  48. Girvan MS, Bullimore J, Pretty JN, Osborn AM, Ball AS. Soil type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total and active bacterial communities in arable soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:1800-9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.3.1800-1809.2003
  49. Landesman WJ, Nelson DM, Fitzpatrick MC. Soil properties and tree species drive $\beta$-diversity of soil bacterial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 2014;76:201-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.025
  50. Wu LK, Lin XM, Lin WX. Advances and perspective in research on plant-soil-microbe interactions mediated by root exudates. Chin J Plant Ecol 2014;38:298-310. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00027
  51. Anglet WR, Gattin IT, Laurent FM, Ajzenberg EL, Norini MP, Latour X, Laval K. Soil microbial community structure and function relationships: a heat stress experiment. Appl Soil Ecol 2014;86:121-30.
  52. Chapin III FS, Walker BH, Hobbs RJ, Hooper DU, Lawton JH, Sala OE, Tilman D. Biotic control over the functioning of ecosystems. Science 1997;277:500-4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.500

Cited by

  1. Hidden mycota of pine needles: Molecular signatures from PCR-DGGE and Ribosomal DNA phylogenetic characterization of novel phylotypes vol.8, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36573-z
  2. Long-term greenhouse vegetable cultivation alters the community structures of soil ammonia oxidizers vol.19, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2089-x
  3. Current Status and Problem-Solving Strategies for Ginseng Industry vol.25, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-019-3046-2
  4. Assessing the Influence of Fumigation and Bacillus Subtilis-Based Biofungicide on the Microbiome of Chrysanthemum Rhizosphere vol.9, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9120255
  5. Different Age-Induced Changes in Rhizosphere Microbial Composition and Function of Panax ginseng in Transplantation Mode vol.11, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.563240
  6. 인삼 연작장해 유발토양과 억제토양의 화학성, 미생물상 및 뿌리썩음병 발생 특성 vol.28, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7783/kjmcs.2020.28.2.142
  7. An LCI‐like protein APC2 protects ginseng root from Fusarium solani infection vol.130, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14771
  8. Differences in microbial communities from Quaternary volcanic soils at different stages of development: Evidence from Late Pleistocene and Holocene volcanoes vol.201, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105211
  9. A Novel Biocontrol Strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FS6 for Excellent Control of Gray Mold and Seedling Diseases of Ginseng vol.105, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-07-20-1593-re
  10. Regulatory role of non-coding RNA in ginseng rusty root symptom tissue vol.11, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88709-3
  11. Comparative Metagenomic and Metabolomic Profiling of Rhizospheres of Panax notoginseng Grown under Forest and Field Conditions vol.11, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122488
  12. Microbiomes across root compartments are shaped by inoculation with a fungal biological control agent vol.170, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104230
  13. Investigating the effect of microbial inoculants Frankia F1 on growth-promotion, rhizosphere soil physicochemical properties, and bacterial community of ginseng vol.172, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104369