DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics

  • Kim, Hee-Kyung (Comprehensive Treatment Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jai-Bong (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yeo, In-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ha, Seung-Ryong (Department of Dentistry, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2015.08.20
  • Accepted : 2015.11.24
  • Published : 2016.02.29

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study investigated the effect of amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One-hundred sixty-five monolithic zirconia specimens ($16.3mm{\times}16.3mm{\times}2.0mm$) were divided into 5 groups (Group I to V) according to the number of A2-coloring liquid applications. Each group was then divided into 11 subgroups by reducing the thickness up to 1.0 mm in 0.1-mm increments (Subgroup 0 to 10, n=3). Colors and spectral distributions were measured according to CIELAB on a reflection spectrophotometer. All measurements were performed on five different areas of each specimen. Color difference (${\Delta}E^*{^_{ab}}$) and translucency parameter (TP) were calculated. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and multiple comparison $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ test (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. There were significant differences in CIE $L^*$ between Subgroup 0 and other subgroups in all groups. CIE $a^*$ increased (0.52<$R^2$<0.73), while CIE $b^*$ decreased (0.00<$R^2$<0.74) in all groups with increasing thickness reduction. Perceptible color differences (${\Delta}E^*{^_{ab}}$>3.7) were obtained between Subgroup 0 and other subgroups. TP values generally increased as the thickness reduction increased in all groups ($R^2$>0.89, P<.001). CONCLUSION. Increasing thickness reduction reduces lightness and increases a reddish, bluish appearance, and translucency of monolithic zirconia ceramics.

Keywords

References

  1. McLean JW, Odont D. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:61-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.112545
  2. Douglas RD, Przybylska M. Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:143-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70147-2
  3. Isgro G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:465-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.003
  4. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: A laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:231-8.
  5. Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:641-52.
  6. Ha SR, Kim SH, Han JS, Yoo SH, Jeong SC, Lee JB, Yeo IS. The influence of various core designs on stress distribution in the veneered zirconia crown: a finite element study. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:187-97. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.187
  7. Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS. Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:296-304. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.296
  8. de Azevedo Cubas G B, Camacho G B, Demarco FF, Pereira-Cenci T. The effect of luting agents and ceramic thickness on the color variation of different ceramics against a chromatic background. Eur J Dent 2011;5:245-52.
  9. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:412-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70035-7
  10. Shokry TE, Shen CS, Elhosary MM, Elkhodary AM. Effect of core and veneer thicknesses on the color parameters of two all-ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:124-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.001
  11. Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, Meegdes M, van der Zel J, Feilzer AJ. The influence of porcelain layer thickness on the final shade of ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:563-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00517-1
  12. Terada Y, Maeyama S, Hirayasu R. The influence of different thicknesses of dentin porcelain on the color reflected from thin opaque porcelain fused to metal. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:352-6.
  13. Ozturk O, Uludag B, Usumez A, Sahin V, Celik G. The effect of ceramic thickness and number of firings on the color of two all-ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60156-0
  14. Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:316-20.
  15. Lund PS, Aquilino SA, Dixon DL. Evaluation of the color and appearance of a new textured opaque porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:548-54.
  16. Kim HK, Kim SH. Effect of the number of coloring liquid applications on the optical properties of monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater 2014;30:e229-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.04.008
  17. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE). Colorimetry, CIE 015. 3rd ed. Vienna: CIE Central Bureau; 2004.
  18. Johnston WM, Ma T, Kienle BH. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:79-86.
  19. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 68;5:819-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680051301
  20. Jorgenson MW, Goodkind RJ. Spectrophotometric study of five porcelain shades relative to the dimensions of color, porcelain thickness, and repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42:96-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90335-4
  21. Jacobs SH, Goodacre CJ, Moore BK, Dykema RW. Effect of porcelain thickness and type of metal-ceramic alloy on color. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:138-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90135-1
  22. Judd DB, Wyszecki G. Color in business, science and industry. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1975. p. 397-417.
  23. Douglas RD, Brewer JD. Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:254-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70233-1
  24. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: Core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88:4-9.
  25. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: Core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:10-5.
  26. O'Keefe KL, Pease PL, Herrin HK. Variables affecting the spectral transmittance of light through porcelain veneer samples. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:434-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90501-M
  27. Nassau K. The physics and chemistry of color. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2001. p. 231-6, 390.
  28. Kingery WD, Bowen HK, Uhlmann DR. Introduction to ceramic. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1976. p. 668.

Cited by

  1. Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods vol.31, pp.suppl 1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0058
  2. Effects of staining liquids and finishing methods on translucency of a hybrid ceramic material having two different translucency levels vol.9, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.387
  3. Comparison of the optical properties of pre-colored dental monolithic zirconia ceramics sintered in a conventional furnace versus a microwave oven vol.9, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.394
  4. Color in Zirconia-Based Restorations and Related Factors: A Literature Review vol.27, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12740
  5. Comparative color and surface parameters of current esthetic restorative CAD/CAM materials vol.10, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.32
  6. Color Aspect of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations: A Review of the Literature pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12906
  7. The colour of monolithic zirconia restorations determined by spectrophotometric examination pp.1743-6761, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2018.1464271
  8. Effect of accelerated aging on translucency of monolithic zirconia vol.2, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2016.11.001
  9. Effect of core/veneer thickness ratio and veneer translucency on absolute and relative translucency of CAD-On restorations vol.3, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2017.04.001
  10. Relative Translucency of a Multilayered Ultratranslucent Zirconia Material vol.18, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2183
  11. Effect of thickness of monolithic zirconia ceramic on final color vol.120, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.007
  12. Comparison of translucency for different thicknesses of recent types of esthetic zirconia ceramics versus conventional ceramics … (in vitro study) vol.4, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2018.05.003
  13. 3M LavaTM Esthetic monolithic zirconia를 이용한 전치부 심미 수복 증례 vol.34, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.4.306
  14. Effect of Thermocycle Aging on Color Stability of Monolithic Zirconia vol.9, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2019.93008
  15. Optical properties and flexural strength of translucent zirconia layered with high-translucent zirconia vol.38, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-157
  16. Monolithic Zirconia: An Update to Current Knowledge. Optical Properties, Wear, and Clinical Performance vol.7, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030090
  17. Comparison of Optical Properties of Laminate Veneers Made of Zolid FX and Katana UTML Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Ceramics vol.16, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i5.2284
  18. Effect of glazing on translucency, color, and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia materials vol.31, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12493
  19. Choice of resin cement shades for a high-translucency zirconia product to mask dark, discolored or metal substrates vol.11, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.286
  20. Optical properties of currently used zirconia‐based esthetic restorations fabricated with different techniques vol.32, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12533
  21. Factors affecting the translucency of monolithic zirconia ceramics: A review from materials science perspective vol.39, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-098
  22. Spectrophotometric examination of the optical effects of monolithic multilayered zirconia with different substrates vol.119, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2019.1707412
  23. Clinical factors affecting the translucency of monolithic Y-TZP ceramics vol.108, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-019-00446-2
  24. Color match of high translucency monolithic zirconia restorations with different thicknesses and backgrounds vol.32, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12596
  25. Effect of Veneering and Hydrothermal Aging on the Translucency of Newly Introduced Extra Translucent and High Translucent Zirconia with Different Thicknesses vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7011021
  26. Color stability of individually stained monolithic zirconia following occlusal adjustment vol.33, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12620
  27. Effect of mouth rinses on optical properties of CAD‐CAM materials used for laminate veneers and crowns vol.33, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12720
  28. Effects of sintering time on translucency and color of translucent zirconia ceramics vol.33, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12723
  29. Effect of sintering regimes and thickness on optical properties of zirconia ceramics for dental applications vol.18, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.13764
  30. Effect of surface finishing and polishing procedures on color properties and translucency of monolithic zirconia restorations at varying thickness vol.33, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12681
  31. Effects of surface treatments and abutment shades on the final color of high-translucency self-glazed zirconia crowns vol.126, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.010
  32. Optical properties of a novel GLASS-CERAMIC restorative material vol.33, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12809
  33. Color compatibility between dental structures and three different types of ceramic systems vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01404-7
  34. Optical properties evaluation of rapid sintered translucent zirconia with two dental colorimeters vol.17, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.05.014