Journal of Wetlands Research (한국습지학회지)

Korean Wetlands Society (한국습지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of Flood Reduction Alternatives for responding to climate change in Gyeongan Watershed

기후변화 대응을 위한 경안천 유역의 홍수저감 대안 선정

  • Han, Daegun (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha university) ;
  • Choi, Changhyun (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha university) ;
  • Kim, Duckhwan (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha university) ;
  • Jung, Jaewon (Department of Safety and Environment Research, The Seoul Institute) ;
  • Kim, Jungwook (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha university) ;
  • Kim, Soo Jun (Columbia Water Center, Columbia University)
  • Received : 2015.10.26
  • Accepted : 2016.04.15
  • Published : 2016.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, the frequency of extreme rainfall event has increased due to climate change and impermeable area also has increased due to rapid urbanization. Therefore, we ought to prepare countermeasures for flood reduction to reduce the damage. To consider climate change, the frequency based rainfall was calculated according to the aimed period(reference : 1971~2010, Target period I : 2011~2040, Target period II : 2041~2070, Target period III : 2071~2100) and the flood discharge was also calculated by climate change using HEC-HMS model. Also, the flood elevation was calculated by each alternative through HEC-RAS model, setting 5 sizes of drainage pumps and reservoirs respectively. The flood map was constructed using topographical data and flood elevation, and the economic analysis was conducted for reduction of flood damage using Multi dimension - Flood Damage Analysis, MD-FDA. As a result of the analysis on the flood control effect, a head of drainage pump was reduced by 0.06m up to 0.44m while it was reduced by 0.01m up to 1.86m in the case of a detention pond. The flooded area shrunk by up to 32.64% from 0.3% and inundation depth also dropped. As a result of a comparison of the Benefit/Cost index estimated by the economic analysis, detention pond E in period I and pump D in period II and III were deemed appropriate as an alternative for climate change. The results are expected to be used as good practices when implementing the flood control works considering climate change.

최근 기후변화로 인하여 태풍 및 집중호우로 인한 극한 강우사상의 발생빈도가 증가하고 있으며, 급격한 도시화로 인한 유역 내 불투수 면적이 늘어나고 있다. 이로 인해 재산피해가 증가하고 있어 기후변화를 고려한 미래 하천범람 등 홍수피해를 경감시키기 위한 홍수저감 대안 선정이 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 기후변화를 고려하여 목표기간별로(기준년도 : 1971~2010년, 목표기간I : 2011~2040년, 목표기간II : 2041~2070년, 목표기간III : 2071~2100년) HEC-HMS모형을 이용하여 기후변화에 따른 홍수량을 산정하였다. 또한, 배수펌프와 저류지를 각각 5개씩 홍수저감 대안으로 설정하여 HEC-RAS모형을 통해 대안별 홍수위를 산정하였다. 지형자료 및 홍수위를 이용하여 홍수범람도를 도시하였으며, 다차원 홍수피해액산정법(Multi dimension - Flood Damage Analysis, MD-FDA)을 이용하여 홍수피해 저감을 위한 대안별 경제성분석을 실시하였다. 홍수저감효과를 분석한 결과 배수펌프를 설치했을 경우 홍수위는 최소0.06m, 최대0.44m 감소하였고, 저류지는 최소0.01m, 최대1.86m 감소하는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 침수면적은 최소 0.3%, 최대 32.64% 감소하였고, 침수심 역시 낮아지는 것으로 확인되었다. 또한, 경제성분석을 실시하여 대안별 편익 비용비를 비교한 결과 목표기간I에서는 저류지E, 목표기간II, 목표기간III에서는 배수펌프D가 홍수저감을 위한 타당한 대안으로 판단되었다. 본 연구의 결과를 통해 기후변화 적응을 위한 치수사업 시 주요사례로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, JH, Yi, JE, Choi, CW(2011), Flood Mitigation Analysis for Abnormal Flood at the South Han River Basin, J. of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 11(5), pp. 265-272. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2011.11.5.265
  2. Akter, T., and S.p. Simonovic(2002), Scientific Method:Optimizing Applied Research Decisions, New York: John Wiley&sons, Inc
  3. Boij, M. J.(2004). Impact of climate change on river flooding assessed with different model complexities, J. of Hydrology, Vol.303, Issues1-4, pp.176-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.07.013
  4. Jung, JW, Kim, YS, Hong, SJ, Kwon, HS, Kim, JW, Kim, HS(2014), Effectiveness Analysis of Artificial Wetland for Flood Reduction, J. of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 14(4), pp. 369-378. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.4.369
  5. Kang, NR(2012), Flood Runoff and Flood Damage Reduction Analysis in an Urban Drainage System Under Climate Chang, Master's Thesis, INHA University. [Korean Literature]
  6. Key, A. L., Reynard, N.S., Jones, R.G. (2006) RCM rainfall for UK flood frequency estimation. I. Method and validation, j. of Hydrology, Vol.318, Issues14, pp.151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.012
  7. Kim, BS, Kim BK, Kyung, MS, Kim, HS(2008), Impact Assessment of Climate Change on Extreme Rainfall and I-D-F Analysis, J. of Korea Water Resources Association, 41(4), pp. 379-394. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2008.41.4.379
  8. Kim, DH(2014), Rainfall Frequency Analysis Using RCP Scenarios in the Korean Peninsula, Master's Thesis, INHA University.
  9. Kim, UT, Lee, DR, Yoo, CS(2004), Effects of Climate Change on the Streamflow for the Daechung Dam Watershed, J. of Korea Water Resources Association, 37(4), pp. 305-314. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2004.37.4.305
  10. Kyoung, MS(2010), Assessment of Climate Change Effect on Standardized Precipitation Index and Frequency Based Precipitation, Ph.D. Dissertation, INHA University. [Korean Literature]
  11. Kim, YS, Kim, SJ, Kwak, JW, Kim HS(2012), Estimation of Frequency Based Snowfall Depth Considering Climate Change, Water Resources Association Conference, Water Resources Association, pp.196. [Korean Literature]
  12. Lee, CS(2007), Decision Making Model for Most Preferable Alternative inBasin-wide Flood Damage Reduction Planning, Ph.D. Dissertation, INHA University. [Korean Literature]
  13. Lee, JH, Jun, YJ, A, JH, K, TW(2009), A Method for Selecting a Structural Optimal Flood Mitigation Plan Using Analytic Hierarchy Process, J. of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 9(3), pp. 117-126. [Korean Literature]
  14. Madahoudaki, R. and M. Tsakiris(2005), Flood Mitigation Planning using PROMEHTEE, European Water, 2005 E, W. Publication, Vol9, No.10, pp.51-58
  15. Maeng. SJ, Jeong, JH, Kim. HS, Mad, AM, Hwang, MH(2015), Runoff Analysis Using Precipitation by Climate Change Scenario And Observed Precipitation, Korean Review of Crisis &Emergency Management, 11(2), pp. 241-259. [Korean Literature]
  16. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2004), A Study on the economic Analysis in Flood Control Projects.
  17. Moss, R. H., Edmonds, J. A., Hibbard, K. A., Manning, M. R., Rose, S. K., Van Vuuren, D. P., ... &Wilbanks, T. J. (2010). The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment, Nature, 463(7282), 747-756. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08823
  18. Oh, SJ(2004), Analysis of flood Runoff Variation in River Basin due to Climate Change, Master's Thesis, KOREA University. [Korean Literature]
  19. Quintana SeguA P., Ribes, A. Martin, E., Habets, F., boe, J.(2009) Comparison of three downscaling methods in simulating the impact of climate change on the hydrology of mediterranean basin, j. of Hydrology, In Press.
  20. Srdjevic, B. and Medeiros, Y.D.P(2008), Fuzzy AHP Assessment of Water Management Plans. Water Resource Management, Vol.22, No.7, pp.877-894 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9197-5
  21. Sung, JH, Kang, HS, Park SH, Cho, CH, Bae, DH, Kim, YO(2012), Projection of Extreme Precipitation at the end of 21st Century over South Korea based on Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP), Korean Meteorological Society, 22(2), pp. 221-231. [Korean Literature]
  22. Tkach, R.J., and S. Simonovic(1997). A new approach to multi-criteria decision making in water resources, j. of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, Vol.1, No.1, pp.25-43

Cited by

  1. Development of Heavy Rain Damage Prediction Functions in the Seoul Capital Area Using Machine Learning Techniques vol.18, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.7.435