DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factor Analysis Influencing Pedestrian Volumes Based on Structural Equation Models

구조방정식(S.E.M.)을 이용한 보행량 영향요인분석

  • 김태현 (서울연구원 도시공간연구실) ;
  • 오주택 (한국교통대학교 도시.교통공학과) ;
  • 이규훈 (한국교통대학교 도시.교통공학과)
  • Received : 2016.04.28
  • Accepted : 2016.05.18
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

Walking behaviors are one of the most basic transport modes in daily life. As a result, the efforts and concerns on pedestrians are consistently increased. This study tried to reveal significant factors for pedestrian volumes through structural equation models and compare the impacts of the whole time of day, off-peak time, peak time on the pedestrian volumes. The results of the analysis show that commercial business factors, accessibility factors, walking environment factors are the most significant factors that increase pedestrian volumes. Whereas, housing factors do not contribute to increase the pedestrian volumes. In the non-peak time, the weight of commercial business factors is higher than the whole time of day, while the weight housing factors, accessibility factors, walking environment factors are lower. In the peak time, however, the weight of commercial business factors decreases rather than the whole time of day, while the weight of the other factors increase.

보행은 일상생활에서 행해지는 가장 기본적인 이동수단으로 보행에 대한 관심과 이를 활성화시키고자 하는 노력이 지속적으로 증가하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 구조방정식을 이용하여 보행량에 영향을 미치는 여러 요인들 간의 관계를 규명하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 하루 전체시간, 비첨두시간, 첨두시간으로 분류하여 시간대 별로 요인들이 보행량에 미치는 영향의 변화를 비교 분석하였다. 분석결과 상업 업무요인, 접근성요인, 보행환경요인이 보행량을 증가시키는 요인으로 작용하는 것으로 나타난 반면, 주거요인은 보행량을 증가시키는데 기여하지 못한다는 결과를 도출하였다. 또한 비첨두시간에는 하루 전체시간보다 상업 업무요인의 가중치가 증가한 반면 주거요인, 접근성요인, 보행환경요인의 가중치는 상대적으로 감소하였다. 첨두시간의 경우 비첨두시간과는 달리 하루 전체시간보다 상업 업무요인의 가중치가 감소하였으며 나머지 세 요인의 가중치는 증가한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jang J. Y., Choi S. T., Lee H. S., Kim S. J. and Choo S. H.(2015), "A comparison analysis of factors to affect pedestrian volumes by land-use type using Seoul Pedestrian Survey data," The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp.39-53. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2015.14.2.039
  2. Heo J.(2013), Amos structural equation models: Fundamentals, Hannarae Academy.
  3. Lee J. W., Kim H. Y. and Jun C. M.(2015), "Analysis of Physical Environment Factors the Affect Pedestrian Volumes by Street Type," Journal of The Urban Design Institute of Korea, vol. 16, no. 2, pp.123-140.
  4. Lee Y. S., Choo S. H. and Kang J. M.(2013), "Analysing Key Factors to Affect Change of Pedestrian Volumes by Neighborhood Units in Seoul," Journal of the Korea Planning Association, vol. 48, no. 5, pp.197-208.
  5. Lee J. A. and Koo J. H.(2013), "The Effect of Physical Environment of Street on Pedestrian Volume," Journal of the Korea Planning Association, vol. 48, no. 4, pp.269-286.
  6. Lee J. A., Lee H. and Koo J. H.(2014), "The Study on Factors Influencing Pedestrian Volume based on Physical Environment of Street," Journal of the Korea Planning Association, vol. 49, no. 2, pp.145-163.
  7. Yun N. Y. and Choi C. G.(2013), "Relationship between Pedestrian Volume and Pedestrian Environment Factors on the Commercial Streets in Seoul," Journal of the Korea Planning Association, vol. 48, no. 4, pp.135-150.
  8. Frank L. D. and Engelke P.(2005), "Multiple Impacts of the Built Environment on Public Health: Walkable Places and the Exposure to Air Pollution," International Region Science Review, vol. 28, no. 2, pp.193-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017604273853
  9. Lee C. and Moudon A. V.(2006), "The 3Ds+R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking," Transportation Research Part D 11, Science Direct, pp.204-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2006.02.003
  10. Pulugurtha S. S. and Repaka S. R.(2008), "Assessment of Models to Measure Pedestrian Activity at Signalized Intersections," The Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2073, pp.39-48. https://doi.org/10.3141/2073-05
  11. Schneider R. J., Henry T., Mitman M. P., Stonehill L. and Koehle J.(2011), "Development and Application of the San Francisco Pedestrian Intersection Volume Model," n:Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting, vol. 2299, pp.65-78.
  12. Kim K. S.(2010), AMOS 18.0, Hannarae Academy.