DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cloud Cover Retrieved from Skyviewer: A Validation with Human Observations

  • Kim, Bu-Yo (Department of Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Jee, Joon-Bum (Weather Information Service Engine, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Zo, Il-Sung (Research Institute for Radiation-Satellite, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Tae (Department of Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • Received : 2015.06.03
  • Accepted : 2015.11.25
  • Published : 2016.02.28

Abstract

Cloud cover information is used alongside weather forecasts in various fields of research; however, ground observation of cloud cover is conducted by human observers, a method that is subjective and has low temporal and spatial resolutions. To address these problems, we have developed an improved algorithm to calculate cloud cover using sky image data obtained with Skyviewer equipment. The algorithm uses a variable threshold for the Red Blue Ratio (RBR), determined from the frequency distribution of the Green Blue Ratio (GBR), to calculate cloud cover more accurately than existing algorithms. To verify the accuracy of the algorithm, we conducted daily, monthly, seasonal, and yearly statistical analyses of human observations of cloud cover, obtained every hour from 0800 to 1700 Local Standard Time (LST) for the entirety of 2012 at the Gangwon Regional Meteorological Administration (GRMA), Korea. A case study compared daily images taken at 1200 LST in each season with pixel images of cloud cover calculated by our improved algorithm. The selected cases yielded a high correlation coefficient of 0.93 with the GRMA data. A monthly case study showed low root mean square errors (RMSEs) and high correlation coefficients (Rs) for December (RMSE = 1.64 tenths and R = 0.92) and August (RMSE = 1.43 tenths and R = 0.91). In addition, seasonal cases yielded a high correlation of 0.9 and 87% consistency within ${\pm}2$ tenths for winter and a correlation of 0.83 and 82% consistency for summer, when cases of cloud-free or overcast conditions are frequent. Annual analyses showed that the bias of GRMA and Skyviewer cloud cover data for 2012 was -0.36 tenth, and the RMSE was 2.12 tenths, with the GRMA data showing more cloud cover. Considering that the GRMA and Skyviewer data were gathered at different spatial locations, GRMA and Skyviewer data were well correlated (R = 0.87) and showed a consistency of 80% in their cloud cover data (consistent within ${\pm}2$ tenths).

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea meteorological Administration

References

  1. Cess, R. D., and Coauthors, 1989: Interpretation of cloud-climate feedback as produced by 14 atmospheric general circulation model. Science, 245, 513-516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4917.513
  2. Ghonima, M. S., B. Urquhart, C. W. Chow, J. E. Shields, A. Cazorla, and J. Kleissl, 2012: A method for cloud detection and opacity classification based on ground based sky imagery. Atmos. Measurement Techniques Discussions, 5(4), 4535-4569. https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-5-4535-2012
  3. Jee, J. B., Y. D. Kim, W. H. Lee, and K. T. Lee, 2010: Temporal and Spatial Distributions of Solar Radiation with Surface Pyranometer Data in South Korea. Journal Korean Earth Science Soc., 31(7), 720-737. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2010.31.7.720
  4. Johnson, R. W., and W. S. Hering, 1987: Automated cloud cover measurements with a solid-state imaging system. In Proceedings of the Cloud Impacts on DOD Operations and Systems-1987, Workshop, San Diego, CA, 59-69.
  5. Kazantzidis, A., P. Tzoumanikas, A. F. Bais, S. Fotopoulos, and G. Economou, 2012, Cloud detection and classification with the use of whole-sky ground-based images. Atmos. Res., 113, 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.005
  6. Kim, Y. H., H. J. Koo, J. C. Nam, and S. N. Oh, 2004: Characteristics of Sunshine and Cloudiness in Seoul. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 40(5), 571-586.
  7. Kim, Y. M., J. Kim, and H. K. Cho, 2008: Development of Objective Algorithm for Cloudiness using All-Sky Digital Camera. Atmosphere, 18(1), 1-14.
  8. Lee, K. H., H. H. Yoo, and J. L. Geoff, 2010: Generation of typical weather data using the ISO Test Reference Year (TRY) method for major cities of South Korea. Building and Environ., 45(4), 956-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.002
  9. Leem, H. H., H. W. Lee, and S. H. Lee, 2005: The Analysis of the Characteristics of the Fog Generated at the Incheon Int'l Airport. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 41(6), 1111-1123.
  10. Long, C., D. Slater, and T. Tooman, 2001: Total Sky Imager (TSI) Model 880 Status and Testing Results, ARM-TR-006. [Available online at http://www.arm.gov/publications/tech_reports/arm-tr-006.pdf.]
  11. Nakajima, T., G. Tonna, R. Rao, P. Boi, Y. Kaufman, and B. Holben, 1996: Use of sky brightness measurements from ground for remote sensing of particulate polydispersions. Appl. Opt., 35(15), 2672-2686. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.002672
  12. Shields, J. E., R. W. Johnson, and T. L. Koehler, 1993: Automated whole sky imaging systems for cloud field assessment. Fourth Symp. on Global Change Studies, Boston, MA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 228-231.
  13. Shields, J. E., M. E. Karr, A. R. Burden, R. W. Johnson, and W. S. Hodgkiss, 2007a: Continuing support of cloud free line of sight determination including whole sky imaging of clouds. Final Report for ONR Contract N00014-01-D-0043 DO #13, Tech. Note 273.
  14. Shields, J. E., M. E. Karr, A. R. Burden, R. W. Johnson, and W. S. Hodgkiss, 2007b: Enhancement of near-real-time cloud analysis and related analytic support for whole sky imagers. Final report for ONR contract N00014-01-D-0043 DO #4, ADA468076.
  15. Shields, J. E., M. E. Karr, A. R. Burden, R. W. Johnson, V. Mikuls, J. Streeter, and W. Hodgkiss, 2009: Research toward Multi-Site Characterization of Sky Obscuration by Clouds. Final Report for Grant N00244-07-1-009, Tech. Note 274.
  16. Shields, J. E., M. E. Karr, R. W. Johnson, and A. R. Burden, 2013: Day/night whole sky imagers for 24-h cloud and sky assessment: history and overview. Appl. Opt., 52, 1605-1616. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.001605
  17. Sutter, M., D. Durr, and R. Philipona, 2004: Comparison of two radiation algorithms for surface-based cloud-free sky detection. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109, D17202. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004582
  18. Yoo, H. C., K. H. Lee, and S. H. Park, 2008: Analysis of Data and Calculation of Global Solar Radiation based on Cloud Data for Major Cities in Korea. J. Korean Solar Energy Soc., 28(4), 17-24.

Cited by

  1. 강릉 지역에서 자동 전운량 장비와 GWNU 태양 복사 모델을 이용한 지표면 일사량 분석 vol.38, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5467/jkess.2017.38.2.129
  2. ELIFAN, an algorithm for the estimation of cloud cover from sky imagers vol.12, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5519-2019
  3. 강릉원주대학교 복사-위성연구소에서 실외 비교관측을 통한 전천일사계 교정 vol.40, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5467/jkess.2018.40.2.135
  4. Cloud Observation and Cloud Cover Calculation at Nighttime Using the Automatic Cloud Observation System (ACOS) Package vol.12, pp.14, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142314
  5. Twenty-four-hour cloud cover calculation using a ground-based imager with machine learning vol.14, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6695-2021
  6. A Deep Learning Model to Forecast Solar Irradiance Using a Sky Camera vol.11, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115049
  7. Performance Assessment of Global Horizontal Irradiance Models in All-Sky Conditions vol.14, pp.23, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237939