The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Validation of TPACK Measurement Tool for Mathematics Teachers

수학교사의 테크놀로지 교수 내용 지식(TPACK) 측정 도구 개발 및 타당화

  • Received : 2017.09.25
  • Accepted : 2017.11.06
  • Published : 2017.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop and verify the TPACK measurement tool for middle and high school mathematics teachers in the Korean context. Also, by clarifying the relationship between subordinate factors of Mathematics teachers' TPACK, an attempt was made to provide suggestions on the designs and directions for the in-service and pre-service teacher education and the programs for improving mathematics teachers' TPACK in the future. In order to achieve this goal, TPACK factors of mathematics teachers were extracted by reviewing literature on PCK, MKT, and TPACK. Then, content validity, basic statistical survey, reliability verification, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation model verification were conducted sequentially. At first, preliminary analysis was carried out on 79 mathematics teachers, and 76 items excluding the items with extreme value and reliability were included in the basic statistical analysis. And secondly, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted on 376 mathematics teachers, and this instrument consisted of 7 subordinate factors(CK, PK, TK, PCK, TCK, TPK, TPACK) and 61 items. Also by conducting confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation model test with 254 mathematics teachers, the measurement tool was confirmed the validity and reliability through statistically significant analysis. Then, the importance of integrated knowledge was confirmed by looking at the relationship between the TPACK factors of in-service mathematics teachers. The integrated knowledge(PCK, TCK, TPK) has played a crucial role in the formation of TPACK rather than the knowledge of CK, PK, and TK alone. Finally, the validity of TCK was confirmed through the structural equation modeling of TPACK. TCK not only directly affected TPACK, but also indirectly through TPK. According to these affirmative results, this measurement tool is claimed to be suitable for measuring the factors of Mathematics teachers' TPACK, and also the structural equation model can be regarded as a suitable model for analyzing the structural relationship of mathematics teachers' TPACK.

Keywords

References

  1. 강순자, 장미라 (2016). 중학교 수학교사의 테크놀로지 통합 자기효능감에 관한 연구, 수학교육 55(4), 523-538. (Kang, S. & Jang, M. (2016). On secondary mathematics teachers' technology integration self-efficacy, The mathematical Education 55(4), 523-538.)
  2. 교육과학기술부 (2011). 수학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시, 제2011-361호. (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2007). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Notice, No. 2011-361.)
  3. 교육부 (1997). 수학과 교육과정, 교육부 고시, 제 1997-15호. (Ministry of Education. (1997). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice, No. 1997-15.)
  4. 교육부 (2015). 수학과 교육과정, 교육부 고시, 제2015-74호. (Ministry of Education. (2015). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice, No. 2015-74.)
  5. 교육인적자원부 (2007). 수학과 교육과정, 교육인적자원부 고시, 제2007-79호. (Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development. (2007). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development, Notice, No. 2007-79.)
  6. 김남희 (2011). 예비 수학 교사 교육에서 공학적 도구의 교육적 활용, 수학교육학연구 21(4), 345-359. (Kim, N. (2014). Educational Using A Technology In The Education Of Future Mathematics Teachers, The journal of educational research in mathematics 21(4), 345-359.)
  7. 김부미 (2012). 우리나라의 ICT 환경 기반 수학 학습 현황 분석, 교과교육학연구 16(3), 657-687. (Kim, B. (2012). Analysis of Mathematical Learning Based the ICT-environment, Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction 16(3), 657-687.)
  8. 김석우 (2015). 사회과학 연구를 위한 SPSS AMOS 활용의 실제, 서울: 학지사. (Kim, S. (2015). Practical use of SPSS AMOS for social science research, Seoul: Hakjisa.)
  9. 김선희 (2012). 미래 수학 교실에 대한 전망과 교사들의 인식 조사, 교과교육학연구 16(1), 285-324. (Kim, S. (2012). Teachers' Perspectives on the Future Mathematics Classroom, Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction 16(1), 285-324.)
  10. 김영봉, 김경수, 강병재, 나항진, 박선미 (2008). 신교육학개론, 서울: 서현사. (Kim, Y., Kim, K., Kang, B., Na, H., & Park, S. (2008). Introduction to New Education, . Seoul: Sohyunsa.)
  11. 노경섭 (2014). 제대로 알고 쓰는 논문 통계분석 : SPSS & AMOS 21, 서울: 한빛아카데미. (No, K. (2014). Statistical analysis of papers that know and write properly : SPSS & AMOS 21, Seoul: Hanbitacademy.)
  12. 노형진 (2016). (SPSS 및 AMOS를 활용한) 구조방정식 모형분석, 서울: 지필미디어. (No, H. (2016). Structural equation modeling using SPSS & AMOS, Seoul: Jiphilmedia.)
  13. 박기철, 강성주 (2014). 초.중등교사의 테크놀로지 교수 내용지식(TPACK)에 대한 인지경로 모형 개발, 교원교육 30(4), 349-375. (Park, G. & Kang, S. (2014). The Development of Cognitive Path Model on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge(TPACK) among Elementary Secondary Teachers, Korean Journal of Teacher Education 30(4), 349-375.)
  14. 박재한 (2013). 수업과 평가에서 공학적 도구 활용에 대한 교사들의 인식 조사. 석사학위논문, 순천대학교. (Park, J. (2013). Survey on Teachers' Perception about Using Technology in Math Instruction and Assessment. master's thesis, Sunchon National University.)
  15. 배병렬 (2016). Amos 24 구조방정식모델링, 서울: 청람. (Bae, B. (2016). Amos 24 Structural equation modeling, Seoul: Chungram.)
  16. 배영민 (2010). 사회과 교사의 테크놀로지 통합 역량의 이해, 중등교육연구 58(2), 73-102. (Bae, Y. (2010). Understanding of the Social Studies Teachers' Capacities for Technology Integration, Secondary Education Studies 58(2), 73-102.)
  17. 봉미미, 송정근 (2004). ICT활용 수학수업에 대한 중학교 수학교사의 학생들의 인식 및 태도 조사. 교과교육학연구 8(2), 147-165. (Bong, M. & Song, G. (2004). Korean Middle School Teachers' and Students' Perceptions and Attitudes Toward ICT Use in Mathematics Classroom, Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction 8(2), 147-165.)
  18. 소연희 (2013). 초등교사들이 지각한 테크놀로지 내용교수학적 지식, 아시아교육연구 14(4), 125-147. (So, Y. (2013). Analysis of the Structural Relations between TPACK(Technology, Pedagogy and Content Knowledge), Teaching Efficacy, and Perceived Teaching Professionalism in Primary School Teachers, Asian Journal of Education 14(4), 125-147.)
  19. 신원석, 한인숙, 엄미리 (2012). 테크놀로지 내용교수지식(TPACK) 역량에 대한 예비교사의 인식 분석, 한국교원연구 28(4), 141-165. (Shin, W., Han, I., & Eom, M. (2012). A Survey on the Differences of Pre-service Teachers' Perception of the Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge (TPACK), The Journal of Korean Teacher Education 28(4), 141-165.)
  20. 신태섭 (2013). 예비 초등교사의 고정신념과 테크놀로지 내용교수지식(TPACK) 간의 관계 연구, 교육과학연구 44(2), 21-45. (Shin, T. (2013). A Relation between Pre-Service Teachers' Fixed Mindsets Regarding their Abilities to Teach with Technology and their Perceived TPACK, Journal of educational studies 44(2), 21-45.)
  21. 엄미리 (2012). 대학 교원의 역량 분석을 통한 교수지원 프로그램 방향성 제고: 테크놀로지 내용교수지식(TPACK)을 중심으로, 교육의 이론과 실천 17(3), 21-45. (Eom, M. (2012). A Suggestion on Teaching Support Program through the Competencies analysis of University Faculties' Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge(TPACK), Theory and Practice of Education 17(3), 21-45.)
  22. 우종필 (2012). 우종필 교수의 구조방정식모델 개념과 이해, 서울: 한나래출판사. (Yu, Jong (2012). Professor Woo Jong-Pil's concept and understanding of structural equation model. Seoul: Hannarae.)
  23. 이민희 (2011). 예비 중등수학교사의 테크놀로지 교수학적 내용지식(TPACK) 함양과정 분석 및 모델 구축. 박사학위논문, 이화여자대학교. (Lee, M. (2011). An analysis of the TPACK cultivation process and model building of middle school pre-service mathematics teachers. Doctorate thesis, Ewha Womans University.)
  24. 이종환 (2016). (SPSS를 이용한) 조사방법 및 통계분석의 이해와 적용, 고양: 공동체. (Lee, J. (2016). Understanding and application of survey method and statistical analysis (using SPSS), Goyang: Community.)
  25. 이진원, 최정원, 이영준 (2016). 초등 교사의 테크놀로지 활용 정도와 TPACK(Technology, Pedagogy, and (Content Knowledge)의 상관 분석, 한국컴퓨터정보학회 학술발표논문집 24(1), 181-182. Yi, J., Choi, J., & Lee, J. (2016). An analysis of correlation between elementary school teachers' utilization of technology and TPACK(Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge, The Korea Society Computer & Information Academic Publications 24(1), 181-182.)
  26. 이형행 (2011). 교육학개론, 서울: 양서원. (Lee, H. (2011). Introduction to Education, Seoul: Yangseowon.)
  27. 임해미 (2009). 예비 수학교사의 테크놀로지 내용교수지식(TPACK) 신장을 위한 팀 프로젝트 효과 연구, 수학교육학연구 19(4), 545-564. (Rim, H. (2009). Study on the Effectiveness of Team Project to Improve TPACK of Preservice Mathematics Teachers, The journal of educational research in mathematics 19(4), 545-564.)
  28. 정용주 (2013). 초중등 교사의 TPACK에 영향을 미치는 교사 요인에 관한 연구, 석사학위논문, 고려대학교. (Jung, Y. (2013). Exploring teacher factors which affect TRACK of in-service teachers. master's thesis, Korea University.)
  29. 정일환 (2003). 교육학기초, 서울: 동문사. (Chung. I. (2003). Pedagogical foundation, Seoul: Dongmunsa.)
  30. 조은애 (2008). 학교 수학 교육에서 공학적 도구의 활용 실태와 활성화 방안, 석사학위논문, 고려대학교. (Cho, E. (2008). Use of engineering tools in school mathematics education and its activation plan. master's thesis, Korea University.)
  31. 주영주 (2014). 온라인 한국어 교사 양성 프로그램에 대한 예비교사의 테크놀로지 내용교수지식 (TPACK)과 교사효능감 연구, 국어교육 145, 379-404. (Ju, Y. (2014). A Study on Pre-service Korean Teacher's TPACK and Teacher Efficacy in Online Korean Language Teacher Training Program., Korean Language Education 145, 379-404.)
  32. 최승현 (2007). 교육과정 개정에 따른 수학과 내용 교수지식(PCK) 연구, 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRI 2007-3-2. (Choe, S. (2007). The Research on Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Mathematics Teaching, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report RRI 2007-3-2.)
  33. 최승현, 황혜정 (2008). 수학과 내용 교수 지식(PCK)의 의미 및 분석틀 개발에 관한 연구, 한국학교수학회논문집 11(4), 569-593. (Choe, S. & Whang, H. (2008). The Research on Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Mathematics Teaching, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics 11(4), 569-593.)
  34. 최현종, 이태욱 (2015). TPACK 모형에 기반한 예비 교사의 테크놀로지 지식 교육 프로그램 적용과 분석, 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지 20(2), 231-239. (Choe, H. & Lee, T. (2015). Implementation and Analysis about Technology Knowledge Education Program for Pre-service Teacher based on the TPACK Model, Journal of the Korea society of computer and information 20(2), 231-239.) https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2015.20.2.231
  35. 한국교육개발원 (2016). 한국교육개발원 <교육정책포럼>. [2016년 6월] 학교급별 교육정보화 인프라 현황. (Korean Educational Development Institute. (2016). Korean Educational Development Institute . School Education Information Infrastructure Status [June 2016].)
  36. 한국교육학술정보원 (2002). ICT 활용교육훈련 자료집, 한국교육학술정보원 TM 2002-4. (Korea Education & Research Information Service. (2002). Training materials for ICT use education, Korea Education & Research Information Service TM 2002-4)
  37. 허준 (2013). (허준의 쉽게 따라하는) Amos 구조방정식 모형 : 기초편, 서울: 한나래아카데미. (Heo, J. (2013). (Heo Jun's easy-to-follow) Amos structural equation model. Seoul: Hannaraeacademy.)
  38. Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments, Journal of Research on Technology in Education 43(4).
  39. Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers through collaborative design, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 28(4), 547-564.
  40. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: an instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21(4), 292-302 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00135.x
  41. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge(TPCK), Computers & Education 52(1), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
  42. Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 9(1), 71-88.
  43. Ball, D. L., Thamas, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?, Journal of Teacher Education 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  44. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK), Educational Technology and Society 13(4), 63-73.
  45. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge, Education Technology and Society 16(2), 31-51.
  46. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling Primary School Pre-Service Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge(TPACK) for Meaningful Learning with Information and Communication Technology(ICT), Computers & Education 57(1), 1184-1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
  47. Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge, TechTrends 53(5), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0327-1
  48. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the Technological, Pedagogical, And Content Knowledge Framework to Design Online Learning Environments and Professional Development, Journal of Educational Computing Research 41(3), 319-346. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.3.d
  49. Dunham, P. H., & Dick, T. (1994). Research on graphing calculators, Mathematics Teacher 87(6), 440-445.
  50. Jonassen, D. H. (1995) Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools, Educational Technology 35(4), 60-63.
  51. Koehler. M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators, 3-29, NY: Routledge.
  52. Koehler. M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 9(1), 60-70.
  53. Koehler. M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 101-111, NY: Springer.
  54. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Examining practicing teachers' perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: a structural equation modeling approach, Instructional Science 41, 793-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9249-y
  55. Latham, G., & Carr, N. (2012). Authentic Learning for Pre-Service Teachers in a Technology-Rich Environment, Journal of Learning Design 5(1), 32-42.
  56. Lubin, I. A., & Ge, X. (2012). Investigating the influences of a LEAPS model on preservice teachers' problem solving, metacognition, and motivation in an educational technology course, Educational Technology Research & Development 60(2), 239-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9224-3
  57. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge, Teachers College Record 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  58. Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration, Computers & Education 51(4), 1523-1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003
  59. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2007). 학교수학을 위한 원리와 규준 (류희찬, 조완영, 이경화, 나귀수, 김남균, 방정숙 역), 서울: 경문사. (원저 2000년 출판)
  60. Niess, M. L. (2006). Guest Editorial: Preparing Teachers to Teach Mathematics With Technology, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 6(2), 195-203.
  61. Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge Growth in Teaching with Technology, Journal of Educational Computing Research 44(3), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.3.c
  62. Olofson, M. W., Swallow, M. J. C., & Neumann, M. D. (2016). TPACKing: A constructivist framing of TPACK to analyze teachers' construction of knowledge, Computers and Education 95, 188-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.010
  63. Ozgun-Koca, S. A., Meagher, M., & Edwards, M. T. (2009). Preservice Teachers' Emerging TPACK in a Technology-Rich Methods Class, Mathematics Educator 19(2), 10-20.
  64. Pierce, R., & Ball, L. (2009). Perceptions that May Affect Teachers' Intention to Use Technology in Secondary Mathematics Classes, Educational Studies in Mathematics 71(3), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9177-6
  65. Sahin, I. (2011). Development of Survey of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK), The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 10(1), 97-103.
  66. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers, Journal of Research on Technology in Education 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
  67. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
  68. Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Conceptual framework. East Lansing, MI: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.
  69. Thompson, A., & Mishra, P. (2007). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPACK!, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 24(2), 38-64.
  70. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Roblin, N. P., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge-a review of the literature, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29(2), 109-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
  71. Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teacher perspectives, Journal of science education and technology 20. 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9230-y
  72. Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., Hwang, F. K., & Lin, T. C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-practical) through the Delphi survey technique, British Journal of Educational Technology 45(4), 707-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078