DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of a low-sodium label on acceptability and perceived saltiness intensity of a dipping sauce for fried pork cutlets

저염 표시가 포크커틀릿 소스의 짠맛 인식과 기호도에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Min-Ji (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kookmin University) ;
  • Kang, Baeg-Won (Nutrition Safety Policy Division, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Wook (Nutrition Safety Policy Division, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) ;
  • Lee, Mi-Young (Nutrition Safety Policy Division, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) ;
  • Chung, Seo-Jin (Department of Nutritional Science & Food Management, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Hong, Jae-Hee (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kookmin University)
  • 김민지 (국민대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 강백원 (식품의약품안전처 영양안전정책과) ;
  • 김종욱 (식품의약품안전처 영양안전정책과) ;
  • 이미영 (식품의약품안전처 영양안전정책과) ;
  • 정서진 (이화여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 홍재희 (국민대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2016.09.01
  • Accepted : 2016.09.16
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of a low-sodium label on acceptability and sensory attributes of a dipping sauce for fried pork cutlets. Two sauce samples, CON (normal sodium level) and LOW-Na (50% sodium level), were evaluated. Consumers (n=77) rated expectations and actual perception of overall liking, purchase intent, and intensities of saltiness, sweetness, sourness, fruit flavor, and degree of flavor balance without and with a carrier (fried pork cutlet) in blind and informed settings. In the informed test, CON labeled as Low-Na (PLACEBO) was additionally tested to examine the placebo effect of information. The low-sodium labeling significantly increased the expected liking and purchase intent, but decreased the expected saltiness. However, the label did not influence actual liking or purchase intent. A significant decrease in actual saltiness was observed only in Low-Na, not in PLACEBO, indicating the label is influential only when actual perception matched the expectation.

본 연구에서는 시판되는 일반 포크커틀릿 소스와 나트륨 함량을 반으로 줄인 저염 포크커틀릿 소스제품을 대상으로 식품의 저염 여부 표시가 소비자 기호도, 구매의사, 짠맛과 다른 특성의 강도 인지에 미치는 영향을 파악하기 위하여 블라인드 테스트 환경과 정보가 주어진 환경 각각에서 시료를 평가하게 하여 정보에 의해 소스의 짠맛과 맛 품질에 어떠한 기대가 형성되었는지 파악하고, 실제 소스를 맛보았을 때 형성된 기대가 충족되는지를 규명하였다. 정보에 의해 소비자가 가지게 되는 기대 수준과 실제 제품간의 차이는 짠맛에서 가장 두드러지게 나타났으며, 저염 표기는 짠맛의 기대를 유의적으로 낮추었다. 저염 표기는 저염 제품에서 동화 효과를 나타내었다. 즉 실제보다 정보의 방향(저염=낮은 짠맛)에 가깝게 평가하게 하였다. 반면 저염 정보는 기호도와 구매의사에 대한 기대 수준을 높였으나, 실제 섭취시 기호도에는 영향을 미치지 않아 소비자들이 주어진 정보에 상응하는 감각 특성의 변화를 뚜렷이 감지하지 않는 이상 정보에 의해 기호도가 영향 받지 않는 것으로 판단된다. 이와 같은 결과를 저염 식품의 상품화에 적용하면, 저염 정보 자체는 소비자들에게 긍정적인 기대를 유발함으로써 제품 구매 동기를 형성하는 데 있어 긍정적으로 작용할 것으로 예측된다. 또한 나트륨을 저감하지 않은 식품과 유사한 감각 특성을 가지도록 저염 식품을 제조할 경우 저염이 아닌 식품과 유사한 기호도를 가지게 되어 재구매에 긍정적인 영향을 미칠 것이라고 판단된다. 동반 식품의 제공은 전반적인 기호도, 시료의 구매 의향, 향미의 조화도 등에 영향을 미치지 않았다. 그러나 일부 맛 특성의 경우, 동반 식품과 함께 평가 시 소스만을 평가할 때와 다르게 감지되었는데 소스 제품의 경우 동반 식품을 제공하면 실제 섭취 상황에서 소비자가 어떻게 제품의 특성을 인지하는지를 더 잘 예측할 수 있다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim ES, Yim GS, Choi KS, Jeong GH, Lee MY, Ryu SH, Yoon EK. A guideline for sodium reduction of processed foods. Food Sci. Ind. 49: 8-17 (2016)
  2. Blaustein MP, Hamlyn JM. Role of natriuretic factor in essential hypertension: An hypothesis. Ann. Intern. Med. 98: 785-791 (1983) https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-98-5-785
  3. Doyle ME, Glass KA. Sodium reduction and its effect on food safety, food quality, and human health. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 9: 44-56 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2009.00096.x
  4. Brown IJ, Tzoulaki I, Candeias V, Elliott P. Salt intakes around the world: Implications for public health. Int. J. Epidemiol. 38: 791-813 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp139
  5. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (MOHW & KCDC). Korea Health Statistics 2014: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VI-2). (2015)
  6. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (MOHW & KCDC). Korea Health Statistics 2012: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES V-3). (2013)
  7. Kim JH, Yoon HR, Kang NE. The study on dietary behavior and health related behaviors of self perceived sodium intake groups. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult. 29: 511-518 (2014) https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2014.29.6.511
  8. Lim HJ. A Study on the food intake, sodium and potassium intakes and urinary excretion of preschool children in Pusan. Korean J. Nutr. 33: 647-659 (2001)
  9. Matters RD. Salt taste and hypertension: A critical review of the literature. J. Chronic Dis. 37: 195-208 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(84)90147-4
  10. Lee SK, Chang EJ, Choi JC, Bahn KN, Kim MH. Current assessment of sodium and potassium intakes in elementary and middle school students through school meals. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 42: 578-585 (2010)
  11. Kim JN, Park SY, Ahn SH, Kim HK. A Survey on the salt content of kindergarten lunch meals and meal providers' dietary attitude to sodium intake in Gyeonggi-do area. Korean J. Community Nutr. 18: 478-490 (2013) https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2013.18.5.478
  12. Ahn SH, Kwon SJ, Kim KM, Yoon JS, Kang BW, Kim JW, Heo S, Cho HY, Kim HK. Study on the eating habits and practicability of guidelines for reducing sodium intake according to the stage of change in housewives. Korean J. Community Nutr. 17: 724-736 (2012) https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.6.724
  13. Dotsch M, Busch J, Batenburg M, Liem G, Tareilus E, Mueller R, Meijer G. Strategies to reduce sodium consumption: A food industry perspective. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 49: 841-851 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390903044297
  14. Kremer S, Mojet J, Shimojo R. Salt reduction in foods using naturally brewed soy sauce. J. Food Sci. 74: 255-262 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01232.x
  15. Zhang J, Xu AQ, Ma JX, Shi XM, Guo XL, Engelgau M, Yan LX, Li Y, Li YC, Wang HC, Lu ZL, Zhang JY, Liang XF. Dietary sodium intake: Knowledge, attitudes and practices in Shandong province, China. PLoS ONE 8: e58973 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058973
  16. Ewa BZ. Food preference among the polish young adults. Food Qual. Prefer. 10: 139-145 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00005-1
  17. Ha CH. Influence of material information on preference of food product: Comparison of bread made from domestic wheat and imported wheat. MS thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea (2015)
  18. Aaron JI, Mela DJ, Evans RE. The influence of attitudes, beliefs and label information on perception of reduced-fat spreads. Appetite 22: 25-37 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1994.1003
  19. Cardello A. Food quality: Relativity, context and consumer expectations. Food Qual. Prefer. 6: 163-170 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-3293(94)00039-X
  20. Deliza R, MacFie HJH. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. J. Sens. Stud. 11: 103-128 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1996.tb00036.x
  21. Caporale G, Policasto S, Carlucci A, Monteleone E. Consumer expectations for sensory properties in virgin olive oils. Food Qual. Prefer. 17: 116-125 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.011
  22. Imm BY, Lee JH, Lee SH. Effects of sensory labels on taste acceptance of commercial food products. Food Qual. Prefer. 25: 135-139 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.01.010
  23. Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT. Overall difference tests: Does a sensory difference exist between samples. pp. 63-104. In: Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 4th ed. Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT (eds). CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA (2007)
  24. Kim DS, Kim JS, Seoung TJ. Amino acid properties and sensory characteristics of chicken stock by different salt contents. Korean J. Culin. Res. 16: 274-285 (2010)
  25. Song CR. The quality characteristics of teriyaki sauces according to the boiling time. Korean J. Culin. Res. 15: 236-247 (2009)
  26. Choi SH, Kim DS. The quality characteristics of tomato sauce prepared with different contents of immature tomato fruit extract. Food Serv. Ind. J. 11: 17-29 (2015)
  27. Kahknen P, Tuorila H, Rita H. How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread. Food Qual. Prefer. 7: 87-94 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-3293(95)00040-2
  28. Westcombe A, Wardle J. Influence of relative fat content information on response to three foods. Appetite 28: 49-62 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1996.0066
  29. Liem DG, Aydin NT, Zandstra EH. Effects of health labels on expected and actual taste perception of soup. Food Qual. Prefer. 25: 192-197 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.02.015
  30. Norton JE, Fryer PJ, Parkinson JA. The effect of reduced-fat labelling on chocolate expectations. Food Qual. Prefer. 28: 101-105 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.08.004
  31. Wansik B, Park SB. Sensory suggestiveness and labeling: Do soy labels bias taste? J. Sens. Stud. 17: 483-491 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2002.tb00360.x
  32. Jung JE. Policy trends of sodium reduction. Food Sci. Ind., 49: 2-7 (2016)
  33. Kahkonen P, Tuorila H, Lawless H. Lack of effect of taste and nutrition claims on sensory and hedonic responses to a fat-free yogurt. Food Qual. Prefer. 8: 125-130 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00032-8
  34. Miele NA, Di Monaco R, Cavella S, Masi P. Effect of meal accompaniments on the acceptability of a walnut oil-enriched mayonnaise with and without a health claim. Food Qual. Prefer. 21: 470-477 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.01.001
  35. Wheeler SC, Berger J. When the same prime leads to different effects. J. Consum. Res. 34: 357-368 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1086/518547

Cited by

  1. Qualitative Consumer Preference Studies on Korean-style Kimchi in Chinese Living in Korea vol.27, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2017.4.27.2.185