DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Survey on Performance Situation of Animal Welfare Approved Farms of Laying Hens

산란계 동물복지 인증농가의 생산실태 조사

  • Hong, Eui-Chul (Institute of Poultry Science, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kang, Bo-Seok (Institute of Poultry Science, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kang, Hwan-Ku (Institute of Poultry Science, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Jeon, Jin-Joo (Institute of Poultry Science, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Soo (Institute of Poultry Science, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Park, Sung-Bok (Institute of Poultry Science, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Chan-Ho (Institute of Poultry Science, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Suh, Sang-Won (Institute of Poultry Science, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Ho (Institute of Poultry Science, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • 홍의철 (국립축산과학원 가금연구소) ;
  • 강보석 (국립축산과학원 가금연구소) ;
  • 강환구 (국립축산과학원 가금연구소) ;
  • 전진주 (국립축산과학원 가금연구소) ;
  • 김현수 (국립축산과학원 가금연구소) ;
  • 박성복 (국립축산과학원 가금연구소) ;
  • 김찬호 (국립축산과학원 가금연구소) ;
  • 서상원 (국립축산과학원 가금연구소) ;
  • 김상호 (국립축산과학원 가금연구소)
  • Received : 2016.12.21
  • Accepted : 2017.03.01
  • Published : 2017.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this survey was to collect basic data on breeding systems of animal welfare-approved laying hen farms in Korea. Questionnaires were mailed to 64 animal welfare-approved farms, and 20 questionnaires (31.3%) were returned. The housing systems were fabric coverlet (4 farms, representing 20%), naturally farmed (Yamagisi, 7 farms, 35%), and steel panel-framed housing (9 farms, 45%). The 20 farms had stocking densities of $2{\sim}3birds/m^2$ (2 farms; 10%), $4{\sim}5birds/m^2$ (10 farms; 50%), and $6{\sim}7birds/m^2$ (8 farms; 40%). Breeding methods were floor-housed (14 farms; 70%), free-range (3 farms; 15%), and floor plus free-range (3 farms; 15%). Stocking density was $4{\sim}6birds/m^2$ at most of the farms with fabric coverlet and naturally farmed housing and $6{\sim}7birds/m^2$ at seven farms (of 9 farms) with a steel panel-framed housing. The daily feed intake of 11 farms (55%) was between 120 and 130 g, which included 3 farms (15%) with fabric coverlet, 3 farms (15%) with naturally farmed housing, and 5 farms (25%) with steel panel-framed housing. The age of peak production was 24~28 weeks overall 20 farms. Over 80% of production on fabric coverlet, naturally farmed, and steel panel-framed house farms was on 3, 4 and 6 farms, respectively. Respiratory disease on the 20 farms represented 55% of total disease incidence, and of each housing type represented 75% (fabric coverlet), 70% (naturally farmed) and 33% (steel panel-framed). E. coli disease was only found in the steel panel-framed housing. Most of the animal welfare-approved eggs were sold at large markets or a real sale markets. Egg price was 200~250 won per egg. These results indicate the current situation of animal welfare-approved farms and could be caused that windowless poultry house was applied to animal welfare approved farms.

본 연구는 국내 산란계 동물복지 인증농가의 사육시설 및 사육형태에 따른 기초 사료를 수집하기 위해 수행하였다. 조사를 위하여 동물복지 인증을 받은 64농가에 설문지를 발송하였으며, 이 중 20농가(31.3%)에서 설문지가 회수되었다. 20농가의 사육시설별 현황은 보온덮개계사, 자연농법계사, 판넬철골조계사가 각각 4농가(20%), 7농가(35%), 9농가(45%)였으며, 사육밀도별 현황은 2~3수/$m^2$ 2농가, 4~5수/$m^2$ 10농가, 6~7수/$m^2$ 8농가였다. 사육형태별 현황은 평사 14농가(70%), 방사 3농가(15%), 평사+방사 3농가(15%)였다. 보온덮개계사와 자연농법계사의 사육밀도는 대부분의 농가에서 4~6수/$m^2$ 로 사육하였고, 판넬철골조계사는 9농가 중 7농가에서 6~7수/$m^2$로 사육하였다. 사료섭취량은 20농가 중 11농가(55%)에서 120~130 g을 섭취하였으며, 보온덮개, 자연농법, 판넬철골조계사의 농가 수가 각각 3농가(15%), 3농가(15%), 5농가(25%)이었다. 사육시설별 산란피크는 보통 24~28주령이었고, 산란율 80% 이상의 농가는 보온덮개 75%, 자연농법 56.2%, 판넬철골조계사 67%이었다. 호흡기 질병 발병률이 55%로 가장 높았으며, 보온덮개계사 75%, 자연농법계사 70%, 판넬철골조계사 33%가 발병하였다. 대장균증은 판넬철골조계사에서만 나타났으며, 발병률은 44%였다. 동물복지 인증을 받은 계란(특히 판넬철골조계사) 중 70%가 대형마트나 지역판매장으로 유통되었다. 사육형태에 따른 계란가격은 평사 14농가 중 6농가(42.9%)가 계란 1개당 200~250원으로 계산되었다. 이런 결과들은 현재 동물복지 인증농가의 생산실태를 보여주고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. AHA 2014 Animal Welfare Standards for Laying Hens-free Range & pasture. American Humane Association.
  2. APQA 2016 Animal Protection Management System. Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency.
  3. Barnes HJ, Gross WB 1997 Diseases of Poultry. 10th ed. Mosby-Wolf publication Ltd. p. 131-141.
  4. Gautom RK 1997 Rapid pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for typing of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other gramnegative organism in 1 day. J Clin Microbiol 35:3977-2980.
  5. Goddard E, Boxall P, Emunu JP, Boyd C, Asselin A, Neall A 2007 Consumer attitudes, willingness to pay and revealed preferences for different egg production attributes: Analysis of Canadian egg consumers. Project Report 07-03, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta. http://purl.umn.edu/52087.
  6. Hall AL 2001 The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behavior of broiler chickens reared commercially. Anim Welf 10:23-40.
  7. Jeon JH, Lee JY, Park KH, Kim DH, Song JI 2012 A farm on laying hens' welfare in Korea. J Lives Hous & Env 18: 151-156.
  8. Jeon JH, Yeon SC, Ha JK, Lee SJ, Chang HH 2005 Acoustic analysis for thermal environment-related vocalizations in laying hens. J Anim Sci & Technol (Kor) 47:697-702. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2005.47.4.697
  9. KAPE 2016 Distribution Information (Egg). Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation.
  10. KFSP 2012 Korean Feeding Standard for Poultry. National Institute of Animal Science, RDA.
  11. Lee JY, Lee YJ, Chae BJ, Lee JH, Yoon SM, Lee MH, Ohh SJ 2010 Changes in the feeding regimen for chicken under welfare-bestowed environment. J Lives Hous & Env 16:61-80.
  12. MAFRA 2014 Agricultural and Livestock Production Index. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  13. Min BJ, Lee WB, Kwon OS, Son KS, Hong JW, Cho JH, Kim IH 2004 The effects of herbal plant mixture supplementation on the performance of laying hens under heat stress. Kor J Poult Sci 1:9-15.
  14. Na JC, Choo HJ, Kim DW, Hwangbo J, Kim JH, Kang HG, Kim MJ, Choi HC, Hong EC 2013 Growth performance and carcass yield of heavy female broiler at different stocking densities. Kor J Poult Sci 40:41-47. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2013.40.1.041
  15. Na JC, Hwangbo J, Kim JH, Kang HG, Kim MJ, Kim DW, Choi HC, Hong EC 2012 Performance and carcass ratio of large-type female broiler at different stocking densities. Kor J Poult Sci 39:305-310. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.4.305
  16. Oh KR 1996 Poultry disease and its prevention. Kor J Poult Sci 23:99-106.
  17. Ohh SJ, Jung YP, Hong SJ, Choi MR, Kim YB, Lee JI 2012 A study on consideration actors affecting to purchase for animal welfare egg- Focused on ranked logit medel -. CNU J Agri Sci 39:133-142.
  18. OIE 2016 Animal Welfare at a Glance. Office International des Epizooties.
  19. Rhee YJ, Song YH 2000 Effects of sound stimulation on growth performance, feeding behavior and egg production in egg-type chickens. J Lives Hous & Env 6:91-96.
  20. RSPCA 2013 RSPCA welfare standards for laying hens. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.
  21. Sohn SH, Jang IS, Son BR 2011 Effect of housing systems of cage and floor on the production performance and stress response in layer. Kor J Poult Sci 38:305-313. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2011.38.4.305
  22. Sorensen P, Su G, Kestin SC 2000 Effects of genotype and population density on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and cost-benefits of broiler chickens in north central Nigeria. Trop Anim Health Prod 42:719-727.
  23. Sung MS, Kim JH, Ha JS, Cho JK, Seol SY, Kim KS 2008 Biochemical properties and serotypes of pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from poultry in Korea. Kor J Vet Res 48:141-151.
  24. Timoney JF, Gillespie JH, Scott FW, Barlough JE 1992 Hagan and Bruner's Microbiology and Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals. 8th ed. pp. 61-71. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Cited by

  1. A Study on Regional Native Chicken and Certification System in France - Focusing on Alsace, Bresse Region - vol.45, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2018.45.1.41