DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the perception of orthodontic treatment according to age: A questionnaire survey

  • Kim, Yoonji (Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2016.09.20
  • Accepted : 2017.03.27
  • Published : 2017.07.25

Abstract

Objective: This questionnaire study aimed to estimate the overall frequencies of positive perception towards orthodontic treatment among adults categorized according to age, sex, and area of living, and to identify barriers or negative perceptions preventing them from receiving orthodontic treatment. Methods: The participants included 598 adults aged over 20 years (230 men and 368 women) who visited the Dental Hospital of Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. The participants' opinions regarding their consideration of receiving orthodontic treatment were recorded using a specially designed questionnaire. Results: The overall rate of positive perception towards orthodontic treatment was 48.5%. Compared to adults in their 20s (63.2%), those in their 40s and 50s had a lower percentage of interest in orthodontic treatment (46.2% and 45.1%, respectively; p < 0.05). Overall, women (52.2%) had a higher rate of interest than did men (42.6%; p < 0.05). The area of living had no effect on the percentage of interest. The order of priority of chief complaints differed according to age: protrusion for those in the 20s and 30s, and spacing for those in the 40s to 60s. Overall, the main reason for not seeking treatment was the treatment fee. Respondents aged over 40 considered themselves "too old" for orthodontic treatment. Conclusions: The middle-aged had a relatively high percentage of interest (above 45%) in orthodontic treatment. However, demographic characteristics were not significantly associated with the positive interest. These results highlight the need for educating the middle-aged about the limitations and possibilities of orthodontic treatment to increase its acceptance.

Keywords

References

  1. Lim SH. Practive survey in 2010 by KAO (Part II). Clin J Korean Assoc Orthod 2012;II:24-9.
  2. Zachrisson BU. Bjorn U. Zachrisson, DDS, MSD, PhD, on current trends in adult treatment, part 2. Interview by Robert G. Keim. J Clin Orthod 2005;39:285-96.
  3. Melsen B. Adult orthodontics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
  4. Stenvik A, Espeland L, Berset GP, Eriksen HM, Zachrisson BU. Need and desire for orthodontic (re-)treatment in 35-year-old Norwegians. J Orofac Orthop 1996;57:334-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215670
  5. Mihram WL, Murphy NC. The orthodontist's role in 21st century periodontic-prosthodontic therapy. Semin Orthod 2008;14:272-89. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2008.07.005
  6. Vanarsdall RL, White RP Jr. Interdisciplinary care--a 'win/win' situation. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1995;10:3.
  7. Scott P, Fleming P, DiBiase A. An update in adult orthodontics. Dent Update 2007;34:427-8, 431-4, 436 passim. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2007.34.7.427
  8. Nattrass C, Sandy JR. Adult orthodontics--a review. Br J Orthod 1995;22:331-7. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.22.4.331
  9. Boyd RL, Leggott PJ, Quinn RS, Eakle WS, Chambers D. Periodontal implications of orthodontic treatment in adults with reduced or normal periodontal tissues versus those of adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:191-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90455-1
  10. Ong MA, Wang HL, Smith FN. Interrelationship between periodontics and adult orthodontics. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:271-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02440.x
  11. Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JA Jr. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod 2002;72:72-80.
  12. Choi SH, Kim JS, Kim CS, Hwang CJ. The influence of age on lip-line cant in adults: a cross-sectional study. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:81-6. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.2.81
  13. Lim SH. Survey on the environment of the orthodontic practice by KAO, 2010 (Part I). Korean J Clin Orthod 2012;1:21-6.
  14. Jung MH. Age, extraction rate and jaw surgery rate in Korean orthodontic clinics and small dental hospitals. Korean J Orthod 2012;42:80-6. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.2.80
  15. Jung MH. Current trends in orthodontic patients in private orthodontic clinics. Korean J Orthod 2009;39:36-42. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.1.36
  16. Mandall NA, Wright J, Conboy F, Kay E, Harvey L, O'Brien KD. Index of orthodontic treatment need as a predictor of orthodontic treatment uptake. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:703-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.10.011
  17. Kerosuo H, Kerosuo E, Niemi M, Simola H. The need for treatment and satisfaction with dental appearance among young Finnish adults with and without a history of orthodontic treatment. J Orofac Orthop 2000;61:330-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001903
  18. Hassan AH, Amin Hel-S. Association of orthodontic treatment needs and oral health-related quality of life in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:42-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.024
  19. Soh J, Sandham A. Orthodontic treatment need in Asian adult males. Angle Orthod 2004;74:769-73.
  20. Jung MH. Evaluation of the effects of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment on self-esteem in an adolescent population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:160-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.040
  21. Livas C, Delli K. Subjective and objective perception of orthodontic treatment need: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:347-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr142
  22. Reichmuth M, Greene KA, Orsini MG, Cisneros GJ, King GJ, Kiyak HA. Occlusal perceptions of children seeking orthodontic treatment: impact of ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:575-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.021
  23. Josefsson E, Bjerklin K, Lindsten R. Factors determining perceived orthodontic treatment need in adolescents of Swedish and immigrant background. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:95-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn069
  24. Tayer BH, Burek MJ. A survey of adults' attitudes toward orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod 1981;79: 305-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(81)90078-6
  25. Tulloch JF, Shaw WC, Underhill C, Smith A, Jones G, Jones M. A comparison of attitudes toward orthodontic treatment in British and American communities. Am J Orthod 1984;85:253-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90064-2
  26. Abu Alhaija ES, Aldaikki A, Al-Omairi MK, Al-Khateeb SN. The relationship between personality traits, pain perception and attitude toward orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2010;80:1141-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/012710-59.1
  27. Pinho T, Neves M, Alves C. Multidisciplinary management including periodontics, orthodontics, implants, and prosthetics for an adult. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:235-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.026
  28. Ong MMA, Wang HL. Periodontic and orthodontic treatment in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:420-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.126597

Cited by

  1. Part I. What drives Korean adults to seek orthodontic treatment: Reliability and validity of a measurement instrument for the perception of orthodontic treatment vol.50, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2020.50.6.363
  2. Perception of Iraqi Orthodontists and Patients toward Accelerated Orthodontics vol.2021, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5512455
  3. Psychological status of TMD patients, orthodontic patients and the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic vol.26, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1858489
  4. A conservative approach for an adult patient with a fractured tooth and crowding: Autotransplantation at the fracture site vol.159, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.06.027
  5. Lithium di silicate ceramic surface treated with Er,Cr:YSGG and other conditioning regimes bonded to orthodontic bracket vol.33, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.012
  6. The effect of social media on patient acceptance of temporary anchorage devices: vol.91, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2319/071020-618.1