DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Phytosociological Community Type Classification and Flora of Vascular Plants for the Forest Vegetation of Daecheongbong Area in Mt. Seorak

설악산 대청봉일대 산림식생의 식물사회학적 군락유형 및 관속 식물상 특성

  • Kim, Ji Dong (Department of Forest Resource, Kongju National University) ;
  • Park, Go Eun (Center for Forest and Climate Change, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Lim, Jong-Hwan (Center for Forest and Climate Change, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Yun, Chung Weon (Department of Forest Resource, Kongju National University)
  • 김지동 (공주대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 박고은 (국립산림과학원 기후변화센터) ;
  • 임종환 (국립산림과학원 기후변화센터) ;
  • 윤충원 (공주대학교 산림자원학과)
  • Received : 2017.02.28
  • Accepted : 2017.03.28
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

The subalpine zone which is vulnerable to climate change could be functioning as a habitat for northern plant species especially in the Korean peninsula. In this study, classification of phytosociological community type and investigation on flora of vascular plants of Daecheongbong area in Mt. Seorak were carried out in order to provide a basic information for an ecological restoration and management of the vegetation through community ecological approach. Vegetation data were collected from 31 of quadrates from May to October, 2016. We analyzed vegetation types with phytosociological method, importance value with Curtis & McIntosh method, CCA using PC-ORD program tool, and flora of vascular plants. As a result, the forest vegetation was classified into Abies nephrolepis community. The community was divided 3 groups such as Pinus pumila group, Rhododendron brachycarpum group and Angelica decursiva group. Therefore, the vegetation had 3 kinds of units. The differential species group, it was classified into total of 7 species group units including Thuja koraiensis and Smilacina bicolor differential species group. The mean importance percentage (MIP) in VU 1 was shown Pinus koraiensis (24.1), A. nephrolepis (23.6) and Betula ermanii (10.5), and in VU 2, it was P. koraiensis (26.2), A. nephrolepis (20.8) and B. ermanii (10.5), and in VU 3, it was P. koraiensis (22.2), A. nephrolepis (16.4), B. ermanii (13.5) in the order, respectively. As for importance values of P. koraiensis and A. nephrolepis representative competition species, were different at each layers. The former (46.7) was higher than the latter (26.1) in tree layer, but the latter was higher than the former in subtree and, shrub and herb layers of VU 1. VU 2 and VU 3 also indicated the same tendency. P. pumila group and A. decursiva group were shown to have positive correlation with altitude and present species, respectively. The designated as the endemic plant was 11 taxa and, as the rare plant 24 taxa and 62.5% of vascular plant was northern plant species. It is necessary to continue further long-term monitoring of 3 vegetation units, IV of main competition species (P. koraiensis and A. nephrolepis) with stratum and main specific species (rare plants and endemic plants) considering vegetation science and, population and community ecology approaches.

기후변화에 취약한 한반도 아고산대는 한대성 북방계식물의 서식처이다. 본 연구는 아고산대 산림의 군집생태학적 접근을 통한 복원 및 관리방안의 기초자료 제공목적으로 설악산 대청봉 일대 산림식생의 군집구조 및 식물상을 구명하였다. 2016년 5월부터 10월까지 31개소의 식생조사를 실시하였고, 식물사회학적 식생유형분류, 중요치, CCA를 분석하였다. 그 결과 식생유형분류체계는 분비나무군락에서 군단위로 눈잣나무군, 만병초군, 바디나물군, 이상 총 3개의 식생유형(VU)으로 분류되었다. 식별종군으로는 눈측백 식별종군, 자주솜대 식별종군을 포함하여 총 7개 종군유형으로 분류되었다. 평균 상대우점치 분석(MIP) 결과, VU 1의 MIP는 잣나무(24.1), 분비나무(23.6), 사스래나무(10.5) 등, VU 2의 MIP는 잣나무(26.2), 분비나무(20.8), 사스래나무(10.5) 등, VU 3의 MIP는 잣나무(22.2), 분비나무(16.4), 사스래나무(13.5) 등의 순이었다. 층위별 주요 경쟁수종인 잣나무와 분비나무의 중요치는 VU 1의 교목층에서 잣나무가 46.7, 분비나무는 26.1로 잣나무가 우세하나 아교목층, 관목층, 초본층에서는 분비나무의 중요치가 잣나무에 비해 높았고, VU 2와 VU 3에서도 교목층은 잣나무의 중요치가 높았지만 아교목층 이하에서는 낮은 값을 나타냈다. CCA ordination 분석 결과, 눈잣나무군은 해발고, 바디나물군은 출현종수와 다소 정의 상관관계를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 산림청 지정 특산식물은 11분류군, 희귀식물은 24분류군으로 북방계 식물의 비율이 62.5%로 나타났다. 결론적으로 본 연구에서 분류된 3개의 식생단위와 분비나무 및 잣나무의 층위별 중요치 변화에 대한 식생학적 접근의 장기 모니터링이 필요하고, 희귀특산식물에 대한 개체군 및 군집생태학적 관리가 필요할 것으로 사료되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen, C.D. et al. 2010. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 660-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
  2. Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W. and Courchamp, F. 2012. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 15: 365-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x
  3. Botkin, D.B. et al. 2007. Forecasting the effects of global warming on biodiversity. Bioscience 57: 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570306
  4. Braun-Blaunquet, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie Grundzuge der Vegetation der Vegetation (3rd Ed.). Springer-Verlag. New York. pp. 865. (in German)
  5. Brower, J.E. and Zar, J.H. 1977. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers. Iowa, U.S.A. pp. 596.
  6. Cheon, K.S., Kim, K.A. and Yoo, K.O. 2016. Floristic study of Mt. Baegam (Hongcheon-gun, Gangwon-do). Korean Journal of Plant Resources 29(2): 171-188. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2016.29.2.171
  7. Chun, Y.M., Kwon, J.H., Hong, M.P., Lee, J.S., Choung, H.L. and Lee, S.H. 2010. Habitat environment and succession of Abies nephrolepis forest in Mt. Seorak. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society 44(1): 93-102. (in Korean with English abstract)
  8. Curtis, J.T. and McIntosh, R.P. 1951. An upland forest continuum in the prairie forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32(3): 476-496. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931725
  9. Dawson, T.P., Jackson, S.T., House, J.I., Prentice, I.C. and Mace, G.M. 2011. Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science 332: 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200303
  10. Ellenberg, H. 1956. Aufgaben und Methoden der vegetationskunde. E. Ulmer. Stuttgart. pp. 136. (in German)
  11. Fuhrer, J., Beniston, M., Fischlin, A., Frei, C., Goyette, S., Jasper, K. and Pfister, C. 2006. Climate risks and their impact on agriculture and forests in Switzerland. Climatic Change 79: 79-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9106-6
  12. Gilman, S.E., Urban, M.C., Tewksbury, J., Gilchrist, G.W. and Holt, R.D. 2010. A framework for community interactions under climate change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.03.002
  13. Hanmmill, K., Penman, T. and Bradstock, R. 2016. Responses of resilience traits to gradients of temperature, rainfall and fire frequency in fire-prone, Australian forests: potential consequences of climate change. Plant Ecology 217: 725-741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0578-9
  14. Hegerl, G.C. et al. 2007. Understanding and Attributing Climate Change. pp. 663-746. In: Solomon, S. et al. (Ed.). Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, U.S.A.
  15. Hill, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN- A FORTRAN Program for Arranging Multivariate Data in an Ordered Two-Way Table by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, New York. pp. 50.
  16. Hong, M.P., Lee, H.J., Chun, Y.M. and Hong, B.R. 2010. Flora of Mt. Seorak, Gangwon-do. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 24(4): 436-486. (in Korean with English abstract)
  17. Hong, S.C., Byen, S.H. and Kim, S.S. 1987. Colored Illustrations of Trees and Shrubs in Korea. Gyemyengsa. Korea. pp. 310. (in Korean)
  18. Hong, Y.P., Kwon, H.Y., Yang, B.H., Lee, S.W., Kim, C.S. and Han, S.D. 2004. Genetic status of an isolated relict population of dwarf stone pine in Mt. Seorak. Journal of Korean Forest Society 93(5): 393-400. (in Korean with English abstract)
  19. Hwang, Y.H., Han, M.S., Kim, Y.Y. and Kim, M.Y. 2014. Vegetation structure and site characteristics of Rhododendron brachycarpum population in South Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 28(6): 751-761. (in Korean with abstract English) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2014.28.6.751
  20. Jang, C.S., Yang, S.G., Jang, H.D., Lee, R.Y., Park, M.S., Kim, K.H. and Oh, B.U. 2015. Floristic study of Woraksan National Park in Korea. Korean Journal of Plant Resources 28(1): 35-63. (in Korean with abstract English) https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2015.28.1.035
  21. Kim, H.S., Bae, S.W., Jang, S.C and Jeong, J.M. 2011. Stand structure and growth characteristics at different elevations of the Korean Pine (Pinus koraiensis) natural forest on Mt. Seorak. Journal of Forest Science 27(3): 157-167. (in Korean with abstract English)
  22. Kim, Y.Y., Na, N.R., Song, H.I. and Jang, C.G. 2016. Floristic study of Mt. Segeolsan in Korea. Korean Journal of Plant Resources 29(1): 110-127. (in Korean with abstract English) https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2016.29.1.110
  23. Kimmins, J.P. 2004. Forest Ecology: A Foundation for Sustainable Forest Management and Environmental Ethics in Forestry. 3 rd Ed. Prentice Hall. New Jersey, U.S.A. pp. 611.
  24. Kong, W.S. 2000. Geoecology on the subalpine vegetation and landscape of Mt. Sorak. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society 35(2): 177-187. (in Korean with abstract English)
  25. Kong, W.S. 2002. Species composition and distribution of Korean alpine plants. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society 37(4): 357-370. (in Korean with abstract English)
  26. Kong, W.S. 2004. Species composition and distribution of native Korean conifers. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society 39(4): 528-543. (in Korean with abstract English)
  27. Kong, W.S. and Lim, J.H. 2008. Disjunctive distribution of Vaccinium vitis-idaea and thermal condition. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society 43(4): 495-150. (in Korean with abstract English)
  28. Korea Forest Service. 2009. Climate Change & Forest. Korea. pp. 246. (in Korean)
  29. Korea Forest Service. 2010a. Korea Biodiversity Information System. http://www.nature.go.kr/
  30. Korea Forest Service. 2010b. Korea Plant Names Index Committee. http://www.nature.go.kr/kpni/
  31. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources. 2010. Explanatory Text of the Geological Map. http://www.kigam.re.kr
  32. Korea Meteorological Administration. 2016. http://www.kma.go.kr/
  33. Korea National Arboretum. 2008. Rare Plants Data Book in Korea. Geobook. Korea. pp. 332. (in Korean)
  34. Korea National Arboretum. 2010. 300 Target Plants Adaptable to Climate Change in the Korea Peninsula. Theulmunhwa. Korea. pp. 492. (in Korean)
  35. Kwon, H.J., Gwon, J.H, Han, K.S., Kim, M.Y. and Song, H.K. 2010. Subalpine forest vegetation of Daecheongbong Area, Mt. Seoraksan. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 24(2): 194-201. (in Korean with English abstract)
  36. Laurance, W.F., Perez-Salicrup, D., Delamonica, P., Fearnside, P., D'Angelo, S., Jerozolinski, A., Pohl, L. and Lovejoy, T. 2001. Rain forest fragmentation and the structure of Amazonian liana communities. Ecology 82: 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0105:RFFATS]2.0.CO;2
  37. Lee, B.C. and Shim, I.S. 2011. Environmental and ecological characteristics distribution of natural growth region in Rhododendron Brachycarpum. Journal of the Environmental Sciences 20(10): 1319-1328. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2011.20.10.1319
  38. Lee, H.Y. 2013. The Phytosociological Characteristics of Abies nephrolepis Community and Population Dynamics as Climate Condition Changes in Mt. Seorak, Korea. Ph.D. Dissertation. Dongguk University. pp. 184. (in Korean with English abstract)
  39. Lee, J.H., Shin, H.S., Cho, H.J. and Yun, C.W. 2014. Subalpine Conifer Forest Communities. National Institude of Ecology. GeoBook. Korea. pp. 136. (in Korean)
  40. Lee, T.B. 2003. Coloured Flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa. Korea. pp. 999. (in Korean)
  41. Lee, W.T. and Yim, Y.J. 2002. Plant Geography. Kangwon National University. Korea. pp. 412. (in Korean)
  42. Lim, D.O., Kim, Y.S., Park, Y.K., Ryu, Y.M and Koh, M.H. 2004. Vacular plants of Mt. Deog-yu area in the Baekdudaegan. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 18(2): 107-123. (in Korean with English abstract)
  43. Lindner, M. et al. 2010. Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 698-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023
  44. Mathys, A.S., Coops, N.C. and Waring, R.H. 2017. An ecoregion assessment of projected tree species vulnerabilities in western North America through the 21st century. Global Change Biology 23: 920-932. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13440
  45. McLaren, J.R. and Turkington, R. 2013. Boreal Forest Ecosystems. Volume 1, pp. 626-635. In: Levin, S.A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. 2nd Ed. Academic Press. Waltham, U.S.A.
  46. McMahon, S.M. et al. 2011. Improving assessment and modelling of climate change impacts on global terrestrial biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.012
  47. Muller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. 2002. Aims and Method of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons Press. New Jersey, U.S.A. pp. 574.
  48. Oh, H.K., Kim, D.P., Oh, K.K., Kang, K.R. and Bae, J.N. 2013. Management methods and vascular plants of the Ohseosan and the Bongsusan, Chungnam. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 16(3): 63-81.(in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2013.16.3.063
  49. Park, H.C., Lee, J.H. and Lee, G.G. 2014. Predicting the suitable habitat of the Pinus pumila under climate change. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 23(5): 379-392. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2014.23.5.379
  50. Park, I.H., Ryu, S.B. and Choi, Y.C. 1998. Forest structure in relation to slope aspect and altitude in Osaek-Taech'ongbong-Shinhungsa area at Soraksan National Park. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 11(4): 486-492. (in Korean with English abstract)
  51. Pereira, H.M. et al. 2010. Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 330: 1496-1501. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196624
  52. Ricketts, T.H. et al. 1999. Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Island Press. Washington, D.C. pp. 471.
  53. Sala, O.E. et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770-1774. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
  54. Sala, O.E. et al. 2005. Chapter 10: Biodiversity Across Scenarios. pp. 375-408. In: Ecosystems and Human well-being: scenarios, volume 2. Millenium Ecosystem Assesment. Island Press. New York, U.S.A.
  55. Shin, H.T., Yoon, J.W., Kim, S.J., Heo, T.I., Kwon, Y.H., Lim, D.O. and An, J.B. 2015. Vascular plants in Mt. Taebaeksan(Taebaek-si), Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 29(3): 309-332. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2015.29.3.309
  56. Shin, J.H. and Kim, C.M. 1996. Ecosystem classification in Korea(I): Ecoprovince classification. FRI Journal of Forest. Science 54: 188-199. (in Korean with English abstract)
  57. Son, Y.H., Koo, C.D., Kim, C.S., Park, P.S., Yun, C.W. and Lee, K.H. 2016. Forest Ecology. Hyangmunsa. Korea. pp. 346. (in Korean with English abstract)
  58. Song, Y.H. and Yun, C.W. 2006. Community type and stand structure of the korean pine(Pinus koraiensis) natural forest in Seoraksan national park. Korean Society of Environment and Ecology 20(1): 29-40.(in Korean with English abstract)
  59. Tsuyama, I., Higa, M., Nakao, K., Matsui, T., Horikawa, M. and Tanaka, N. 2105. How will subalpine conifer distributions be affected by climate change? Impact assessment for spatial conservation planning. Regional Environmental Change 15: 393-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0641-9
  60. Walter, H., Harnickell, E. and Muller-Dombois, D. 1975. Climate-Diagram Maps of the Individual Continents and the Ecological Climatic Regions of the Earth. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. pp. 36.
  61. Yim, K.B., Park, I.H. and Lee, K.J. 1980. Phytosociological changes of Pinus densiflora forest induced by insect demage in Kyonggi-do Area. Journal of Korean Forest Society 50: 56-71. (in Korean with English abstract)
  62. Yim, Y.J. and Baek, S.D. 1983. Vegetation of Daecheongbong, Mt. Seolag. Journal of Ecology and Environment 6(1): 1-13. (in Korean with English abstract)
  63. Yun, C.W. 2016. Field Guide to Trees and Shrubs. Geobook. Korea. pp. 703. (in Korean)
  64. Yun, C.W., Kim, H.J., Lee, B.C., Shin, J.H., Yang, H.M. and Lim, J.H. 2011. Characteristic community type classification of forest vegetation in South Korea. Journal of Korean Forest Society 100(3): 504-521. (in Korean with English abstract)
  65. Yun, C.W., Kim, H.J., Yang, H.M., Lim, J.H., Kim, Y.K., Shin, J.H. and Lee, B.C. 2009. Correlation analysis between forest vegetation type and environment factor in Mt. Hwaaksan. Journal of the Environmental Sciences 18(5): 579-588. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2009.18.5.579