DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploratory Study about the Activity Framework for 3D Printing in Education and Implementation

3D 프린팅 활용 교육 프레임워크 제안 및 적용의 탐색적 연구

  • So, Hyo-Jeong (Dept. of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Ji-hyang (Dept. of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kye, Bokyung (Korea Education and Research Information Service(KERIS))
  • 소효정 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과) ;
  • 이지향 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과) ;
  • 계보경 (한국교육학술정보원)
  • Received : 2017.07.20
  • Accepted : 2017.08.25
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

This study selected 3D printing that is highly likely to be adopted in schools. This research was conducted in two stages: 1) proposing the learning activity framework for utilizing 3D printing in education, and 2) exploring the potential of integrating 3D printing in the school field. The '3D printing learning activity framework' proposed in this study includes four phases that are categorized according to the complexity of problem-solving processes and collaborative interaction: Step 1 as production through replication, Phase 2 as means of imaginary expression, Phase 3 as near problem-solving, and Phase 4 as expanded problem-solving. Next, we conducted the field study with 23 students in the 6th grade math class where they learned the various solid shapes and volumes through 3D printing-integrated activities. The lesson was considered as Phase 1, which is the production through replication. Overall, the results showed that the participants had positive perceptions about the efficacy of 3D printing activities, the quality of learning experience, and satisfaction. On the other hand, it was found that the usability of 3D printers and CAD program needs further improvement The contribution of this study can be found in the learning activity framework that can guide 3D printing activity design in school, and in the exploration of enhancing the connection between 3D printing activities and curricular relevance beyond simple interest toward a novel technology.

본 연구는 학교에서 도입가능성이 높다고 판단된 신기술인 3D 프린팅 활용 교육을 연구대상으로 선정하였다. 연구는 크게 3D 프린팅 활용을 위한 학습활동 프레임워크 제안과 3D 프린팅 활용 교육의 현장적용 가능성을 모색하는 두 단계로 실시하였다. 본 연구에서 제안하는 '3D 프린팅 활용 학습활동 프레임워크'는 '문제 해결과정의 복잡성'과 '협동적 상호작용'을 두 축으로 하여, 1단계는 재현을 통한 제작, 2단계는 상상 표현의 수단, 3단계는 근접한 문제 해결, 4단계는 확장된 문제 해결의 네 단계로 활동을 구분하였다. 두 번째 연구목적인 학교현장에서의 사례 연구를 위해 초등학교 6학년 23명의 학습자를 대상으로 수학교과에 3D 프린팅 활동을 접목한 수업을 실시하였다. 학생들은 '1단계 재현을 통한 제작'에 3D 프린팅을 활용하여 다양한 도형의 형태와 부피를 학습하였다. 연구결과 참여 학습자들이 전반적으로 3D 프린팅 기술을 활용한 수업의 효과성에 대해 긍정적인 학습경험을 보였으며 학습경험의 질 및 만족감 또한 높은 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 3D 프린터 및 CAD 프로그램의 사용성에는 개선이 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 향후 3D 프린팅 활동 설계를 가이드할 수 있는 거시적 프레임워크를 제안하고, 단순 흥미를 넘어서 교과연계성을 가지는 3D 프린팅 활동의 가능성을 탐색했다는 점에서 그 의의를 찾을 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: K-12 education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  2. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80-97.
  3. Brown, A. (2015). 3D Printing in instructional settings: Identifying a curricular hierarchy of activities. TechTrends, 59(5), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0887-1
  4. Buehler, E., Grimes, S., & Grimes, S. (2015). Investigating 3D printing education with youth designers and adult educators. FabLearn 2015.
  5. Byun, M. K., & Jo, J. H., & Cho, M. H. (2015). The analysis of learner’s motivation and satisfaction with 3D printing in science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(5), 877-884. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.5.0877
  6. Cho, H. H., & So, H. S., & Jung, J. H., & Lee, J. Y. (2014). 3D printing and free semester math. Proceedings of the KSME 2014 Spring Conference on Math. Edu. 2014(1), 209-215.
  7. Choi, H. S., & Yu, M. R. (2015). A study on educational utilization of 3D printing: Creative design model-based class. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(2), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.2.167
  8. Department of Education, UK. (2013). 3D printers in schools: uses in the curriculum. School and college qualification and curriculum (October, 2013). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/3d-printers-in-schools-uses-in-the-curriculum
  9. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. (2013). 7 things you should know about makerspaces. EDUCAUSE(April 9, 2013), http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/7-things-you-should-know-aboutmakerspaces
  10. Eisenberg, M. (2013). 3D printing for children: What to build next?. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.004
  11. Eom, J. T., & Kwon, Y. J., (2016). Development of the biomimicry - Focused convergence teaching program using 3D modeling & printing in life science. Biology Education, 44(4), 658-673. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.4.658
  12. Ji, S. H., & Nam, Y. S. (2007). An inquiry into the orientation of education for sustainable development in the 21st century knowledge-based society. The Environmental Education, 20(1), 62-72.
  13. Johnson, L., Brown, M., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., & Diaz, V. (2016). Horizon report 2016 higher education edition. New Media Consortium.
  14. Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3), 1-13.
  15. Lee, I. H., & Shin, J. M., & Cho, H. Y. (2015). Design and operation of 3D printing education curriculum in mechanical engineering. Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers, 14(3), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.14775/ksmpe.2015.14.3.021
  16. Lee, Y. C., & Kim, H. P. (2015). The effects of an invention education program using 3D design and 3D printers on elementary school students' creativity. The Journal of Practical Arts Education Research, 21(3), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2015.21.3.39
  17. Leigh, S. J., Bradley, R. J., Purssell, C. P., Billson, D. R., & Hutchins, D. A. (2012). A simple, low-cost conductive composite material for 3D printing of electronic sensors. PloS one, 7(11), e49365. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049365
  18. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2004). Role of affect in cognitive processing in academic contexts. Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on Intellectual functioning and development, 57-87.
  19. Park, K. (2014). Applications of 3D CAD and 3D printing in engineering design education. Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering 31(12), 1085-1091. https://doi.org/10.7736/KSPE.2014.31.12.1085
  20. Smith, R. C., Iversen, O. S., & Hjorth, M. (2015). Design thinking for digital fabrication in education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.10.002

Cited by

  1. 컴퓨팅 사고 함양을 위한 HVC 학습전략 기반 SW교육모델 개발 vol.21, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.5.583
  2. 체계적 문헌고찰을 통한 메이커 교육 관련 연구 분석 vol.23, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.6.529
  3. Development and Effectiveness Analysis of Extra-curricula Activities utilizing 3D Printing based on Design Thinking for Engineering College Students vol.20, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.12.2407
  4. 3D 프린팅 구조물을 이용한 자기주도 학습방법이 방사선학과 학생들에 미치는 교육 효과 vol.14, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2019.14.1.45
  5. A Study on the Development of 3D Printing Instructional Materials for Specialized High School based on Creativity Education vol.21, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2020.21.5.875