Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Character Competency Change in High School Students by Role Assignment in Argument-Based Inquiry(ABI) Science Class

논의-기반 탐구 과학수업에서 역할분담에 따른 고등학생들의 인성 역량 변화 분석

  • Received : 2017.07.18
  • Accepted : 2017.08.26
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of Argument-Based Inquiry (ABI) strategy on student's character competency. For this study, 51 grade 11 students (two classes) were selected to the role assignment (ABI-R group) and 46 students (two classes) were assigned to the non-role assignment group (ABI group). In the result, the role assignment group (ABI-R group) showed a statistically higher change in character competency than the group without role assignment (ABI group). Particularly, the ABI-R group has significantly higher grade than ABI group in empathy, responsibility, and respect among the sub-factors of character competency. However, in the case of the cooperation factor of character competency, the ABI group showed statistically significant higher grade than ABI-R group. The results of this study showed that Argument-Based Inquiry (ABI) as teaching and learning strategies in science can contribute to the enhancement of human character competency. In addition, we suggest that students should be actively involved in the class through role assignment, but it is necessary to present the class situation so that they can be actively engaged according to the problem situation rather than being fixed in a given role.

이 연구는 현장의 과학 수업의 학생들의 인성 여량에 미치는 영향을 분석하여 교과교육을 통한 인성 교육의 가능성을 제시하기 위해 탐구 전 과정에서 논의와 글쓰기를 강조한 논의-기반 탐구(Argumentbased Inquiry, ABI) 과학수업을 교수학습 전략으로 적용하였다. 논의-기반 탐구(ABI) 과학수업에서 역할분담을 변인으로 하여 역할분담을 한 집단(ABI-R집단)과 역할분담을 하지 않은 집단(ABI집단)의 두 집단으로 나누어 집단별 인성 역량 변화를 분석하였다. 이를 위해 광역시에 위치한 남녀공학 일반계 고등학교 2학년을 대상으로 하여 2개 학급 51명은 논의-기반 탐구(ABI) 과학수업에서 역할분담을 하고(ABI-R집단), 2개 학급 46명은 역할분담을 하지 않았다(ABI집단). 4개의 탐구 주제를 총 10시간에 걸쳐 진행하였으며, 처치 전 동일시기에 인성지수 검사를 실시하고 사후 인성지수 검사를 실시하여 변화를 분석하였다. 논의-기반 탐구(ABI) 과학수업의 마지막 단계의 반성 글쓰기에 나타나는 인성 역량을 알아보았고, 과학 수업을 통한 인성 역량 함양에 대한 설문지를 통해 학생들의 인성 교육에 대한 인식 조사를 실시하였다. 과학교과의 논의-기반 탐구(ABI) 과학수업에서 역할분담을 적용한 집단(ABI-R집단)이 역할분담을 하지 않은 집단(ABI집단)의 인성지수 검사 결과, ABI-R집단이 ABI집단 보다 인성 역량 변화가 통계적으로 유의미하게 높았다. 특히, 인성 역량의 하위 요소 중 공감, 책임, 존중에서 역할분담을 적용한 그룹이 역할분담을 나누지 않은 통계적으로 유의미하게 높았다. 모둠 활동과 같은 협동학습에서 역할분담을 통해 학생들은 자신의 역할을 명확하게 인지함으로써 수업에 대한 참여도가 높아지게 되고, 학생들 사이의 상호작용이 촉진되며 다른 사람을 배려하고 존중하게 된다. 그러나 협력 항목에서는 이와는 반대로 역할분담을 적용하지 않은 그룹이 통계적으로 유의미하게 높게 나타났다. 이는 개인이 하나의 역할을 유지하지 않고, 모둠내에서 자연스럽게 자신의 역할을 형성하고 상황에 따라 역할을 교대하면서 공동의 문제를 해결하기 위해 노력하면서 협동이 높아진 것으로 보인다. 논의-기반 탐구(ABI) 과학수업에 대한 학생들의 인식 조사를 분석한 결과, 학생들은 자신들의 인성 역량 변화에 도움이 된다는 인식이 많았고, 협력 항목이 가장 크게 증가할 것으로 기대하고 있었다. 이는 학생들이 논의-기반 탐구(ABI) 과학수업이라는 모둠 활동에서 서로의 이해를 공유하고, 지식 및 정보를 의사소통을 통해 공유함으로써 공동의 문제를 해결하는 것을 강조하기 때문에 인성 역량을 키우는데 도움이 될 것이라고 생각하는 것으로 볼 수 있다. 과학교과에서 모둠 활동에서 역할분담을 통해 학생들이 수업에 적극적으로 참여하도록 하되, 주어진 역할 수행에만 고정되지 않고 문제 상황에 따라 능동적으로 임할 수 있도록 수업상황을 제시할 필요가 있음을 제안하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Berkowitz, M. W., & Simmons, P. (2003). Integrating science education and character education: The role of peer discussion. In D. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 117-138). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  2. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176008
  3. Brush, T. A. (1998). Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(3), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299758
  4. Character education improvement act (2015). Enforcement 2015.7.21., Enactment 2015.1.20.(Law No. 13004)
  5. Chi, E. L., Do, S. L., & Lee. Y. S. (2012). Development of Personality Index, Ministry of Education- Policy research report.
  6. Cho, N. S. (2013). Reconsidering Character Education in Schools. The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(2), 93-117. https://doi.org/10.15754/jkpe.2013.35.2.005
  7. Chung, J. W., Oh, J. H., & Jung, E. G. (2013). A FGI Study for Exploring School Music Teachers' Recognition to Competency-Based Music Education and its relation to Character Education. 11(3), 83-106.
  8. De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2009). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: the impact of role assignment and self-assessment on students' levels of knowledge construction through social negotiation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00292.x
  9. Education Reform Commission (2015). Educational Reform Plan for Establishing New Education System.
  10. Gasevic, D., Adesope, O., Joksimovic, S., & Kovanovic, V. (2015). Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The internet and higher education, 24, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.006
  11. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Johnson-Holubec, E. (1992). Advanced cooperative learning. Edina, MN: Interaction.
  12. Jung, W. Y., Lee, G. E., Shin, H. J., Cha, H. J., & Kim, C. J. (2012). Role formation by interaction function and pattern for group discussion activity using the case of environmental education camp for undergraduate student. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(4), p555-569. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.555
  13. Kim, M. J. (2010). A study on methods for personality education in morals education. Journal of Moral & Ethics Education, 14, 181-206.
  14. Kim, S. E. (2000). The reality and prospect of juvenile crime in Korea. Korean criminological review, 44, 1-36.
  15. Kwak, Y. S. (2013). Way of restructuring key competencies for a revision of science curriculum. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 34(4), 378-387
  16. Lee, J. M., & Lee. H. (2016). Study on the material development of the private christian university for character education based on the national competency standards and its effectiveness. Korean Journal of Christian Studies, 47. 313-347.
  17. Lee, J. S., Cloninger, R., Cloninger, K. M., & Chae, H. (2014). The temperament and character inventory for integrative medicine. The Korean Society of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, 25(3), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.7231/jon.2014.25.3.213
  18. Lee, J. S., Chi, E. L., & Do, S. L. (2012). Construct investigation for the development of job related personality inventory. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 221-243.
  19. Lee, K. W., Jeon, J. C., Huh, K. C., Hong, W. P. & Kim, M. S. (2008). A study on the design method of elementary and secondary school curriculum for promoting the core competencies of future koreans-general report, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation; RRC 2007-1.
  20. Makitalo, K., Weinberger, A., Hakkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2004). Uncertainty-reducing cooperation scripts in online learning environments. In 1st joint meeting of the EARLI SIG 6 Instructional Design and SIG 7 Learning and Instruction with Computers, Tubingen, Germany (p. 8).
  21. McCrindle, A. R., & Christensen, C. A. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance. Learning and Instruction, 5(2), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(95)00010-Z
  22. Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 revised curriculum-Science. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  23. Ministry of Education (2016). Future education policy direction and task compared with intelligence information society-Press Releases(2016. 12. 23)
  24. Mudrack, P. E., & Farrell, G. M. (1995). An examination of functional role behaviour and its consequences for individuals in group settings. Small Group Research, 26(4), 542-571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496495264005
  25. Nam, J. H., Kwak, K. H., Jang, K. H., & Hang, B. (2008). The implementation of argumentation using science writing heuristic(SWH) in middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
  26. OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 collaborative problem solving framework. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf
  27. OECD. (2016). Global competency for an inclusive world. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/education/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf
  28. Olesova, L., & Lim, J. (2016). The impact of role assignment on cognitive presence in asynchronous Online Discussion. Handbook of Research on Innovative Pedagogies and Technologies for Online Learning in Higher Education, 19.
  29. Park, J. D. (2014). Humanity Education and Teaching School Subjects: Is It Possible and Necessary to Teach the Humanity?. The Journal of Moral Education, 26(1), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.17715/jme.2014.04.26.1.177
  30. Park, H. A., Bae, S. W., & Park, J. S. (2014). The likert scale attention points applied to research on attitude and interests on science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 34(4), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.4.0385
  31. Park, S. J., & Ko, K. H. (2014). TA study on the personality educational method of university students. Korean Journal of Parent Education, 11(1), 35-50.
  32. Park, Y. S., & Jerome, G. (2016). World future report 2045-there is an unpredictable future. Kyobobook.
  33. Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2005). The impact of role assignment on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups: A multilevel analysis. Small Group Research, 36(6), 704-745. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405281771
  34. Strijbos, J.W., Martens, R. L., Jochems,W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modelling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35(2), 195-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496403260843
  35. Sung, H. M., & Nam, J. H. (2013). The impact of reading framework as a reading strategy on writing for reflection of middle school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(2), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.249
  36. Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., Voss, J. F., Hmelo, C., & Williams, S. (1997). Complex mathematical problem solving by individuals and dyads. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 435-484. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1504_1
  37. Xie, K., Yu, C., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2014). Impacts of role assignment and participation in asynchronous discussions in college-level online classes. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.003
  38. Yoo, J. B. (2015). Desirable youth personality education direction. Symposium on Korean Youth Research Association, 9-24.