DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Efficacy of The National Scholarship System and Policy Suggestions

국가장학금의 효과성 분석과 개선방안에 대한 고찰

  • 박승렬 (극동대학교 사회과학대학) ;
  • 한병석 (한양대학교 경영연구소)
  • Received : 2018.10.05
  • Accepted : 2018.12.20
  • Published : 2018.12.28

Abstract

This study analyzes whether the national scholarship system achieves the policy goal to provide the half-tuition and suggests ways to improve the policy. The study finds that the national scholarship system provides free education for students from under 2nd decile income and the half-tuition for students from under 6th decile. However, since students don't feel fully the effect of the policy, this study proposes policy improvements on new approaches to public communications. Also is suggested the necessity to change the policy tool from debt-like to equity-like investment.

본 연구는 국가장학금제도가 반값등록금 지원이라는 소기의 정책목적을 달성하였는지를 분석해 보고, 이에 대한 개선방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 소득분위별로 등록금 경감률을 계산하여 실질적으로 반값등록금이 달성되었는지를 분석하는 방법론을 활용하였다. 연구결과 국가장학금 제도는 소득 2구간 이하의 학생들에게는 무상교육을, 6분위 이하의 학생들에게는 반값등록금을 지원하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이처럼 과반수의 학생들이 반값등록금 정책의 실질적인 혜택을 받고 있으나, 그 체감도가 떨어지는 것은 반값이라는 홍보성 구호가 국민들에게 각인되었기 때문이다. 따라서 본고에서는 이러한 인식차이를 좁힐 수 있는 홍보방식의 개선과 등록금을 단순지출이 아닌 투자의 개념으로 전환할 필요가 있다는 정책개선방안을 제시하였다. 또한 현행 무상지원 및 대출형 지원방식에서 벗어나 투자형 지원방식의 도입을 통해 학생과 정부의 부담을 동시에 최소화할 수 있는 방안도 검토하였다.

Keywords

OHHGBW_2018_v9n12_259_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Composition of Tuition Payer(%)

Table 1. Rate of Participation in Tertiary Education

OHHGBW_2018_v9n12_259_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Yearly National Scholarship Budget(KRW tn)

OHHGBW_2018_v9n12_259_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Public Contribution Rate(%) to Tertiary Education by Income Decile

OHHGBW_2018_v9n12_259_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. Ministry of Education. Half-tuition policy achieved in 2015 (Press Release, 2015.1.6.). http://www.moe.go.kr
  2. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The quarterly journal of economics, 106(2), 407-443. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937943
  3. Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of political economy, 70(5, Part 2), 9-49. https://doi.org/10.1086/258724
  4. Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2001). The legacy of US educational leadership: Notes on distribution and economic growth in the 20th century. American Economic Review, 91(2), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.18
  5. Mincer, J. (1981). Human capital and economic growth.
  6. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American economic review, 51(1), 1-17.
  7. B. S. Lee, & O. H. Woo, (2018), Reconstruction of Discourse on Curriculum Reconstruction. Journal of Korean Convergence Society. 9(6), 9-16.
  8. B. S. Lee. (2004), A Study on Korea Tertiary Education System and Policy Suggestions. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development
  9. Y. S. Ha. (2008), A Study on Establishment of National Scholarship Foundation and Suggestions to Introduction of ICL. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
  10. B. K. Huh. (2003), A Study on Introduction of National Scholarship. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
  11. B. S. Han, & H. G. Kang. (2013). History of Financial Support for Human Capital with Emphasis on Student Aid Policy. The Review of Business History, 28(3), 45-79.
  12. Ministry of Employment and Labor. Yearbook of Employment and Labor Analysis 2017
  13. OECD. Education at a Glance 2018.
  14. Ministry of Education. Statistical Yearbook of Education 2016.
  15. Ministry of Education.. Announcement of National Scholarship Program for 2018 Fiscal Year (Press Release, 2018.2.6). http://www.moe.go.kr
  16. B. S. Han, & H. G. Kang. (2015). History of Derivatives Contracting on Student Loan. The Review of Business History, 30(2), 163-183.