DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of Optimized Growth Medium and Cryoprotective Additives to Enhance the Growth and Survival of Lactobacillus salivarius

  • Yeo, Soyoung (Research Institute of Eco-friendly Livestock Science, Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Shin, Hee Sung (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Hye Won (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hong, Doseon (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Hyunjoon (Department of Life Sciences, Handong Global University) ;
  • Holzapfel, Wilhelm (Advanced Green Energy and Environment Institute (AGEE), Handong Global University) ;
  • Kim, Eun Bae (Department of Animal Life Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Huh, Chul Sung (Research Institute of Eco-friendly Livestock Science, Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2018.01.28
  • Accepted : 2018.03.12
  • Published : 2018.05.28

Abstract

The beneficial effects of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been intensively investigated in recent decades with special focus on modulation of the host intestinal microbiota. Numerous discoveries of effective probiotics are driven by a significantly increasing demand for dietary supplements. Consequently, technological advances in the large-scale production and lyophilization are needed by probiotic-related industries for producing probiotic LAB for commercial use. Our study had a dual objective, to determine the optimum growth medium composition and to investigate appropriate cryoprotective additives (CPAs) for Lactobacillus salivarius, and compare its responses with other Lactobacillus species. The one-factor-at-a-time method and central composite design were applied to determine the optimal medium composition for L. salivarius cultivation. The following composition of the medium was established (per liter): 21.64 g maltose, 85 g yeast extract, 1.21 ml Tween 80, 6 g sodium acetate, $0.2g\;MgSO_4{\cdot}7H_2O$, $0.02g\;MnSO_4{\cdot}H_2O$, $1g\;K_2HPO_4$, $1.5g\;KH_2PO_4$, $0.01g\;FeSO_4{\cdot}7H_2O$, and 1 g sodium citrate. A cryoprotective additive combination comprising 10% (w/v) skim milk and 10% (w/v) sucrose supplemented with 2.5% (w/v) sodium glutamate was selected for L. salivarius, and its effectiveness was confirmed using culture-independent methods in the freeze-dried cells of the Lactobacillus strains. In conclusion, the optimized medium enhanced the species-specific cultivation of L. salivarius. On the other hand, the cryoprotective effects of the selected CPA mixture may also be dependent on the bacterial strain. This study highlights the necessity for precise and advanced processing techniques for large-scale production of probiotics in the food and feed industries.

Keywords

References

  1. Ljungh A, Wadstrom T. 2006. Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics. Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol. 7: 73-89.
  2. Holzapfel WH, Wood BJB. 2014. Introduction to the LAB, pp. 1-12. In Holzapfel WH, Wood BJB (eds.), Lactic Acid Bacteria - Biodiversity and Taxonomy. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, West Sussex, UK.
  3. Serban DE. 2014. Gastrointestinal cancers: influence of gut microbiota, probiotics and prebiotics. Cancer Lett. 345: 258-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2013.08.013
  4. Dahiya DK, Renuka, Puniya M, Shandilya UK, Dhewa T, Kumar N, et al. 2017. Gut microbiota modulation and its relationship with obesity using prebiotic fibers and probiotics: a review. Front. Microbiol. 8: 563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00563
  5. Sanchez B, Delgado S, Blanco-Miguez A, Lourenco A, Gueimonde M, Margolles A. 2017. Probiotics, gut microbiota, and their influence on host health and disease. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 61: 1600240. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600240
  6. Marchesi JR, Adams DH, Fava F, Hermes GD, Hirschfield GM, Hold G, et al. 2016. The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier. Gut 65: 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309990
  7. van den Elsen LW, Poyntz HC, Weyrich LS, Young W, Forbes-Blom EE. 2017. Embracing the gut microbiota: the new frontier for inflammatory and infectious diseases. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 6: e125. https://doi.org/10.1038/cti.2016.91
  8. Grand View Research, Inc. 2017. Probiotics dietary supplements market analysis by application (food supplements, nutritional supplements, specialty nutrients, infant formula), by regions (north America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, CSA), and segment forecasts, 2014-2025. Report ID: GVR-1- 68038-380-5.
  9. Feighery LM, Smith P, O'Mahony L, Fallon PG, Brayden DJ. 2008. Effects of Lactobacillus salivarius 433118 on intestinal inflammation, immunity status and in vitro colon function in two mouse models of inflammatory bowel disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 53: 2495-2506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-007-0157-y
  10. Messaoudi S, Manai M, Kergourlay G, Prevost H, Connil N, Chobert JM, et al. 2013. Lactobacillus salivarius: bacteriocin and probiotic activity. Food Microbiol. 36: 296-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2013.05.010
  11. Murphy EF, Cotter PD, Hogan A, O'Sullivan O, Joyce A, Fouhy F, et al. 2013. Divergent metabolic outcomes arising from targeted manipulation of the gut microbiota in diet- induced obesity. Gut 62: 220-226. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300705
  12. Jin GD, Lee JY, Kim EB. 2017. Draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus salivarius KLW001 isolated from a weaning piglet. Korean J. Microbiol. 53: 134-136.
  13. de Man JD, Rogosa M, Sharpe ME. 1960. A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 23: 130-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1960.tb00188.x
  14. Hwang CF, Chang JH, Houng JY, Tsai CC, Lin CK, Tsen HY. 2012. Optimization of medium composition for improving biomass production of Lactobacillus plantarum Pi06 using the Taguchi array design and the Box-Behnken method. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 17: 827-834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-012-0007-4
  15. Liew SL, Ariff AB, Raha AR, Ho YW. 2005. Optimization of medium composition for the production of a probiotic microorganism, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, using response surface methodology. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 102: 137-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.009
  16. Tari C, Ustok FI, Harsa S. 2009. Optimization of the associative growth of novel yoghurt cultures in the production of biomass, ${\beta}$-galactosidase and lactic acid using response surface methodology. Int. Dairy J. 19: 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2008.10.009
  17. Lew LC, Liong MT, Gan CY. 2013. Growth optimization of Lactobacillus rhamnosus FTDC 8313 and the production of putative dermal bioactives in the presence of manganese and magnesium ions. J. Appl. Microbiol. 114: 526-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12044
  18. Dong Z, Gu L, Zhang J, Wang M, Du G, Chen J, et al. 2014. Optimisation for high cell density cultivation of Lactobacillus salivarius BBE 09-18 with response surface methodology. Int. Dairy J. 34: 230-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2013.07.015
  19. Fahy GM, Wowk B. 2015. Principles of cryopreservation by vitrification. In Wolkers WF, Oldenhof H (eds.), Cryopreservation and freeze-drying protocols. Methods Mol. Biol. 1257: 21-82.
  20. Ming LC, Rahim RA, Wan HY, Ariff AB. 2009. Formulation of protective agents for improvement of Lactobacillus salivarius I 24 survival rate subjected to freeze drying for production of live cells in powderized form. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2: 431-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-009-0184-0
  21. Siaterlis A, Deepika G, Charalampopoulos D. 2009. Effect of culture medium and cryoprotectants on the growth and survival of probiotic lactobacilli during freeze drying. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 48: 295-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02529.x
  22. Rault A, Béal C, Ghorbal S, Ogier JC, Bouix M. 2007. Multiparametric flow cytometry allows rapid assessment and comparison of lactic acid bacteria viability after freezing and during frozen storage. Cryobiology 55: 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.04.005
  23. Kramer M, Obermajer N, Bogovic Matijasic B, Rogelj I, Kmetec V. 2009. Quantification of live and dead probiotic bacteria in lyophilised product by real-time PCR and by flow cytometry. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 84: 1137-1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2068-7
  24. Berney M, Hammes F, Bosshard F, Weilenmann HU, Egli T. 2007. Assessment and interpretation of bacterial viability by using the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Kit in combination with flow cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 3283-3290. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02750-06
  25. Pascaud A, Amellal S, Soulas ML, Soulas G. 2009. A fluorescence-based assay for measuring the viable cell concentration of mixed microbial communities in soil. J. Microbiol. Methods 76: 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.09.016
  26. Frey DD, Wang H. 2006. Adaptive one-factor-at-a-time experimentation and expected value of improvement. Technometrics 48: 418-431. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017006000000075
  27. Yeo S, Park H, Ji Y, Park S, Yang J, Lee J, et al. 2015. Influence of gastrointestinal stress on autoinducer-2 activity of two Lactobacillus species. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 91: fiv065. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiv065
  28. Pfeiler EA, Klaenhammer TR. 2007. The genomics of lactic acid bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 15: 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007.09.010
  29. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/ World Health Organization (FAO/WHO). 2001. Report of the Joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria, 1-4 October 2001, Cordoba, Argentina. FAO, Rome, Italy.
  30. Holzapfel W, Olasupo N, Haberer P. 1998. Lactobacilli in a healthy diet, pp. 20-32. In Gaukel V, Spieb WEL (eds.), Proceedings (Part 1) of the 3rd Karlsruhe Nutrition Symposium: European Research Towards Safer and Better Food.
  31. Markets and Markets Analysis. 2013. Probiotics market by products (functional foods, dietary supplements, specialty nutrients, animal feed), applications (regular, therapeutic, preventive health care) & ingredients (lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, yeast) - global trends & forecasts to 2017. Available at http:// www.marketsandmarkets.com/.
  32. Hammes WP, Hertel C. 2006. The genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium. Prokaryotes 4: 320-403.
  33. Aeschlimann A, von Stockar U. 1990. The effect of yeast extract supplementation on the production of lactic acid from whey permeate by Lactobacillus helveticus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 32: 398-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00903772
  34. Amrane A, Prigent Y. 1998. Influence of yeast extract concentration on batch cultures of Lactobacillus helveticus: growth and production coupling. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14: 529-534. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008828415639
  35. Champagne CP, Gaudreau H, Conway J, Chartier N, Fonchy E. 1999. Evaluation of yeast extracts as growth media supplements for lactococci and lactobacilli by using automated spectrophotometry. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 45: 17-21. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.45.17
  36. Lim CH, Rahim RA, Ho YW, Arbakariya BA. 2007. Optimization of growth medium for efficient cultivation of Lactobacillus salivarius I 24 using response surface method. Malays. J. Microbiol. 3: 41-47.
  37. Arasaratnam V, Senthuran A, Balasubramaniam K. 1996. Supplementation of whey with glucose and different nitrogen sources for lactic acid production by Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 19: 482-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(95)00147-6
  38. Yoo IK, Chang HN, Lee EG, Chang YK, Moon SH. 1997. Effect of B vitamin supplementation on lactic acid production by Lactobacillus casei. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 84: 172-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0922-338X(97)82551-2
  39. Nancib N, Nancib A, Boudjelal A, Benslimane C, Blanchard F, Boudrant J. 2001. The effect of supplementation by different nitrogen sources on the production of lactic acid from date juice by Lactobacillus casei subsp. rhamnosus. Bioresour. Technol. 78: 149-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00009-8
  40. Liu B, Yang M, Qi B, Chen X, Su Z, Wan Y. 2010. Optimizing L-(+)-lactic acid production by thermophile Lactobacillus plantarum As.1.3 using alternative nitrogen sources with response surface method. Biochem. Eng. J. 52: 212-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2010.08.013
  41. Gao X, Qiao SY, Lu WQ. 2009. Determination of an economical medium for growth of Lactobacillus fermentum using response surface methodology. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 49: 556-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02705.x
  42. Mokhtari A, Blancato VS, Repizo GD, Henry C, Pikis A, Bourand A, et al. 2013. Enterococcus faecalis utilizes maltose by connecting two incompatible metabolic routes via a novel maltose-6'-phosphate phosphatase (MapP). Mol. Microbiol. 88: 234-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12183
  43. Srivastava AK, Tripathi AD, Jha A, Poonia A, Sharma N. 2015. Production, optimization and characterization of lactic acid by Lactobacillus delbrueckii NCIM 2025 from utilizing agro-industrial byproduct (cane molasses). J. Food Sci. Technol. 52: 3571-3578.
  44. Sriphannam W, Unban K, Ashida H, Yamamoto K, Khanongnuch C. 2012. Medium component improvement for ${\beta}$-galactosidase production by a probiotic strain Lactobacillus fermentum CM33. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11: 11242-11251.
  45. Jacques NA, Hardy L, Knox KW, Wicken AJ. 1980. Effect of Tween 80 on the morphology and physiology of Lactobacillus salivarius strain IV CL-37 grown in a chemostat under glucose limitation. J. Gen. Microbiol. 119: 195-201.
  46. Corcoran BM, Stanton C, Fitzgerald GF, Ross RP. 2007. Growth of probiotic lactobacilli in the presence of oleic acid enhances subsequent survival in gastric juice. Microbiology 153: 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.28966-0
  47. Carvalho AS, Silva J, Ho P, Teixeira P, Malcata FX, Gibbs P. 2004. Relevant factors for the preparation of freeze-dried lactic acid bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 14: 835-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.02.001
  48. Carvalho AS, Silva J, Ho P, Teixeira P, Malcata FX, Gibbs P. 2003. Effect of various growth media upon survival during storage of freeze-dried Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus durans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94: 947-952. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01853.x
  49. Chen H, Chen S, Chen H, Wu Y, Shu G. 2014. Effects of carbon sources and prebiotics added to growth media on proliferation and survival of Lactobacillus bulgaricus LB6 during freeze-drying. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 6: 894-899.
  50. van de Guchte M, Serror P, Chervaux C, Smokvina T, Ehrlich SD, Maguin E. 2002. Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 82: 187-216. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020631532202
  51. Reddy KBPK, Awasthi SP, Madhu AN, Prapulla SG. 2009. Role of cryoprotectants on the viability and functional properties of probiotic lactic acid bacteria during freeze drying. Food Biotechnol. 23: 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905430903106811
  52. Juarez Tomas MS, Bru E, Martos G, Nader-Macias ME. 2009. Stability of freeze-dried vaginal Lactobacillus strains in the presence of different lyoprotectors. Can. J. Microbiol. 55: 544-552. https://doi.org/10.1139/W08-159
  53. Li B, Tian F, Liu X, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W. 2011. Effects of cryoprotectants on viability of Lactobacillus reuteri CICC6226. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 92: 609-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3269-4
  54. Zhao G, Zhang G. 2005. Effect of protective agents, freezing temperature, rehydration media on viability of malolactic bacteria subjected to freeze-drying. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99: 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02587.x
  55. Crowe JH, Crowe LM, Carpenter JF, Rudolph AS, Wistrom CA, Spargo BJ, Anchordoguy TJ. 1988. Interactions of sugars with membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 947: 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4157(88)90015-9
  56. Hubalek Z. 2003. Protectants used in the cryopreservation of microorganisms. Cryobiology 46: 205-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00046-4
  57. Morichi T, Irie R, Yano N, Kembo H. 1963. Protective effect of glutamic acid and related compounds on bacterial cells subjected to freeze-drying. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 9: 149-161. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.9.149
  58. Coulibaly I, Dubois-Dauphin R, Destain J, Fauconnier ML, Lognay G, Thonart P. 2010. The resistance to freeze-drying and to storage was determined as the cellular ability to recover its survival rate and acidification activity. Int. J. Microbiol. 625239: 1-9.
  59. Gilliland SE, Speck ML. 1974. Frozen concentrated cultures of lactic starter bacteria. A review. J. Milk Food Technol. 37: 107-111. https://doi.org/10.4315/0022-2747-37.2.107
  60. Smittle RB, Gilliland SE, Speck ML, Walter WM Jr. 1974. Relationship of cellular fatty acid composition to survival of Lactobacillus bulgaricus in liquid nitrogen. Appl. Microbiol. 27: 738-743.
  61. Kell DB, Kaprelyants AS, Weichart DH, Harwood CR, Barer MR. 1998. Viability and activity in readily culturable bacteria: a review and discussion of the practical issues. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73: 169-187. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000664013047
  62. Davis C. 2014. Enumeration of probiotic strains: review of culture-dependent and alternative techniques to quantify viable bacteria. J. Microbiol. Methods 103: 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2014.04.012
  63. Yao AA, Dortu C, Egounlety M, Pinto C, Edward VA, Huch M, et al. 2009. Production of freeze-dried lactic acid bacteria starter culture for cassava fermentation into gari. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8: 4996-5004.
  64. Lee SB, Kim DH, Park HD. 2016. Effects of protectant and rehydration conditions on the survival rate and malolactic fermentation efficiency of freeze-dried Lactobacillus plantarum JH287. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100: 7853-7863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7509-5
  65. Radulovic Z, Mirkovic N, Bogovic-Matijasic B, Petrusic M, Petrovic T, Manojlovic V, et al. 2012. Quantification of viable spray-dried potential probiotic lactobacilli using real-time PCR. Arch. Biol. Sci. 64: 1465-1472. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS1204465R

Cited by

  1. 동결건조한 Lactobacillus fermentum SK152 균주의 생존율에 미치는 동결보호제의 효과 vol.37, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22424/jmsb.2019.37.3.206
  2. High-Fat Diet Affects Heavy Metal Accumulation and Toxicity to Mice Liver and Kidney Probably via Gut Microbiota vol.11, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01604
  3. Lyophilized Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria Viability in Potato Chips and Its Impact on Oil Oxidation vol.9, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9050586
  4. Anti-Inflammatory and Gut Microbiota Modulatory Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus Strain LDTM 7511 in a Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis Murine Model vol.8, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060845
  5. Effects of buffer salts on the freeze-drying survival rate of Lactobacillus plantarum LIP-1 based on transcriptome and proteome analyses vol.326, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126849
  6. Rehydration before Application Improves Functional Properties of Lyophilized Lactiplantibacillus plantarum HAC03 vol.9, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9051013
  7. Ligilactobacillus salivarius functionalities, applications, and manufacturing challenges vol.106, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11694-0