Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improving the Inventive Thinking Tools Using Core Inventive Principles of TRIZ

TRIZ의 핵심 발명원리를 이용한 발명적 사고도구의 개선

  • Kim, Tai-Young (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Hyeon (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Park, Young-Taek (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 김태영 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과) ;
  • 김중현 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과) ;
  • 박영택 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과)
  • Received : 2018.01.02
  • Accepted : 2018.04.16
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: SIT(Systematic Inventive Thinking) has been widely used in recent years. The validity of the five thinking tools of SIT is examined, and how to improve the inventive thinking tools is investigated. Methods: Frequency analysis on the usage of the TRIZ 40 inventive principles was used. Inventive thinking tools are derived by eliminating principles with low frequencies and grouping similar principles together. Results: Segmentation, prior action, combining, extraction, cushion in advance, transformation of properties are most frequently used among the 40 principles of TRIZ. The most frequently used principles and similar principles with them are grouped into new inventive thinking tools. Two of them, division and attribute dependency, belong to the 5 thinking tools of SIT, and the others, proactive measures, combination and reversal, do not. Conclusion: The newly identified inventive thinking tools are division, combination, proactive measures, attribute dependency, and reversal. The new five inventive thinking tools are quite efficient since they can cover more than two thirds of the TRIZ 40 inventive principles.

Keywords

References

  1. Altshuller, Genrich S. 2007. The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity. Technical Innovation Center.
  2. Boyd, Drew. 2013. Think Inside the Umbrella: The Five Techniques of S.I.T. Available from: http://www.innovationinpractice.com/innovation_in_practice.
  3. Boyd, Drew, and Jacob Goldenberg. 2013. Inside the Box: A Proven System of Creativity for Breakthrough Results. Simon & Schuster.
  4. Domb, Ellen, and Karen Tate. 1997. "40 inventive principles with examples." The TRIZ Journal. Available from: https://triz-journal.com/40-inventive-principles-examples/.
  5. Goldenberg, Jacob, Roni Horowitz, Amnon Levav, and David Mazursky. 2003. "Finding Your Innovation Spot." Harvard Business Review 81:120-29.
  6. Heo, Keon, Haeguen Song, Jae H. Shim, and Young T. Park. 2016. "The Effect of SIT in the Development of Creative New Food Products." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 44(1):95-107. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.1.095
  7. Horowitz, Roni. 2001. "From TRIZ to ASIT in 4 Steps." The TRIZ Journal. Available from: https://triz-journa-l.com/triz-asit-4-steps/.
  8. Ilevbare, Imoh M., David Probert, and Robert Phall. 2013. "A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice." Technovation 33(2-3):30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.003
  9. Kang, Ikseon, Haeguen Song, and Young T. Park. 2016. "Measuring Creativity of Ideas and the Corresponding Customer Satisfaction." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 44(1):139-152. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.1.139
  10. Park, Jin Y., and Young T. Park. 2017. "A Study on the Business Creativity Codes Embedded in New Product Design Concepts: Focusing on the K-Design Award Winners." Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society 12(3):310-332.
  11. Kim, Jung H., Hyung S. Yeo, and Young T. Park. 2017. "On the Use of TRIZ Tools: Focusing on the Application Cases in S Company." Journal of Engineering Education Research 20(4):3-11.
  12. Kim, Jung H., and Young T. Park. 2017. "Analysis of TRIZ Inventive Principles Embedded in SIT Thinking Tools." Journal of Engineering Education Research 20(6):35-42. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2017.20.6.35
  13. Park, Young T. 1997. "An Extension of Quality Function Deployment." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 25(4):27-49.
  14. Park, Young T. 2015. "Quality Management and Creative Innovation." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 43(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2015.43.1.001
  15. Park, Young T. 2016. Park on Creative Ideation. Korean Standards Association Media.
  16. Rantanen, K., and E. Domb. 2002. Simplified TRIZ: New Problem-Solving Applications for Engineers and Manufacturing Professionals. CRC Press.
  17. Stern, Y., R. Taragin, and S. Larry 2007. "New Thoughts for Food." Food Technology 61(10):34-40. Technology vs Globalization.
  18. Yeo, Hyung S., Jung H. Kim, Jun Y. Lee, and Young T. Park. 2017. "A Study on the Application of SIT and BCC for New Product Concept Development." Journal of Industrial Design 11(2):11-21.
  19. Yeo, Hyung S., and Young T. Park. 2017. "The Effects of Flipped Learning and Mind-Wandering on Idea Generation: Focusing on the use of SIT & BCC." Journal of Engineering Education Research 20(5):23-33. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2017.20.5.23
  20. Yeon, Ju H., and Young T. Park. 2017. "A Study on the Inherent Inventive Thinking Principle and Creativity of Overseas Idea Products." Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society 12(1):167-192. https://doi.org/10.24878/tkes.2017.12.1.167