DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment Using the ICF-core set for Children and Youth with Cerebral Palsy: A Single Case Study

  • Yun, YuNa (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Student of Dankook University) ;
  • Choi, GoEun (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Student of Dankook University) ;
  • Lim, Hyoung won (Department of Physical Therapy, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2019.03.19
  • Accepted : 2019.04.19
  • Published : 2019.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the usefulness of International Classification of Functioning, disability and health core set for children and youths with cerebral palsy (ICF-core set for CP) by comparing the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88), which is the most widely used outcome measure in children with cerebral palsy (ICF-core set for CP). Method: One subject (Female, 14) was evaluated by GMFM-88 and ICF-core set for CP. In addition, the concept of GMFM-88 was compared with the concept of the ICF-core set for CP in compliance with ICF linking rules. The numerical values both of the GMFM-88 categories and the ICF-core set for CP's items were compared. Results: The ICF b760 was linked to the GMFM-88 59~61. d415 was linked to 57~58 of GMFM-88. d450 was linked to GMFM-88's 65~72. d455 was linked to GMFM-88 at 77and 80~83. Conclusion: The association of the ICF-core set for CP and GMFM-88 was confirmed. In addition, the number of categories of ICF-core set for CP was smaller than the number of items of GMFM-88. In conclusion, the ICF-core set for CP is an evaluation tool that can identify the various features of children. In addition, GMFM-88 was linked to the ICF core set for CP according to the ICF linking rules.

Keywords

References

  1. M Bax, M Goldstein, P Rosenbaum et al. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(8):571-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001216220500112X
  2. HJ Park, CH Yi, SH Gho et al. Physical therapist's understanding and the usage of assessment and cerebral palsy. J Kor Phys Ther. 2000;7(1):1-21.
  3. J N Vargus-Adams, L Martin. Measuring what matters in cerebral palsy: a breadth of important domains and outcome measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(12):2089-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.018
  4. R Kunz, I Autti-Ramo, H Anttila et al. A systematic review finds that methodological quality is better than its reputation but can be improved in physiotherapy trials in childhood cerebral palsy. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(12):1239-48.
  5. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. geneva: world health organization. 2001.
  6. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. 2nd ed. Ministry of health & welfare. 2016.
  7. J Bickenbach, A Cieza, A Rauch et al. ICF-core sets: manual for clinical practice. Boston, Hogrefe Publish Cop. 2012.
  8. World Health Organization, International classification of functioning, disability and health: children & youth version: ICF-CY. World health organization. 2007.
  9. V Schiariti, M Selb, A Cieza et al. International classification of functioning, disability and health core sets for children and youth with cerebral palsy: a consensus meeting. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(2):149-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12551
  10. G Stucki, A Cieza, T Ewert et al. Application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(5):281-2. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110105222
  11. JH Kim, TH Kim. An ICF-Core sets for children and youth with cerebral palsy based approach from a physical therapist perspective: a single case study. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016;23(1):55-64
  12. RP de Olivia, CACT Caldas, M Riberto. Application of the ICF-CY Brief Core Set for cerebral palsy on a school age child. Acta Fisiatr. 2016;19(3): 46-50.
  13. A Cieza, C Oberhauser, J Bickenbach et al. Towards a minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(3):218-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-218
  14. ICF, ICF-based documentation tool. https://www.icf-core-sets.org.
  15. R Palisano, P Rosenbaum, S Walter et al. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(4):214-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x
  16. Palisano RJ, Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL et al. Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2000; 80(10):974-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.10.974
  17. Song JY, Choi JD. The usability study for Gross Motor Function classification system as motor development prognosis in children with cerebral palsy. J Kor Phys Ther. 2008;20(1):49-56.
  18. ICF, ICF e-learning tool, https://www.icf-elearing.com.
  19. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T eat al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification on functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:2005-210.
  20. Cieza A, Gevh S, Chatterji S et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970510040263
  21. Stucki G, Cieza A. The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) core set for rheumatoid arthritis: a way to specify functioning. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(2):40-5
  22. JM Song, HJ Lee. Mapping items of functioning questionnaires into the international classification of functioning, disability and health: stroke. Kor Phys Ther. 2016;28(5);341-7. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.5.341
  23. HJ Lee, JM Song. Mapping items of functioning questionnaires into the international classification of functioning, disability and health: low back pain. Kor Phys Ther. 2016;28(5);321-7. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.5.321
  24. HJ Lee, JM Song. Linking of Items in two function-related questionnaires to the international classification of functioning, disability and health: shoulder pain. J Kor Phys Ther. 2018;30(6):239-45 https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2018.30.6.239
  25. Schiariti V, Tatla S, Sauve K et al. Toolbox of multiple-item measures aligning with the ICF-core sets for children and youth with cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017;21(2):252-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.10.007
  26. Engelen V, Ketelaar M, Gorter JW. Selecting the appropriate outcome in paediatric physical therapy: how individual treatment goals for children with cerebral palsy are reflected in GMFM-88 and PEDI. J Rehabil Med. 2007;29(3):225-31. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0040
  27. Fowler EG, Staudt LA, Greenberg MB. Lower-extremity selective voluntary motor control in patients with spastic cerebral palsy: increased distal motor impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(3):264-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03586.x
  28. Lim HW. Correlation between the selective control assessment of lower extremity and pediatric balance scale scores in children with spastic cerebral palsy, J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(12):3645-49. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3645
  29. Park EY, Kim WH. Structural equation modeling of motor impairment, gross motor function, and the functional outcome in children with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(5):1731-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.003
  30. Pavao SL, F.Barbosa KA, Tatiana de Oliveira Sato et al. Functional balance and gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(10):2278-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.05.024
  31. Lim HW. Study of the usefulness of pediatric balance scale as a prediction indicator for gross motor function classification system in children with cerebral palsy. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016;2(1):22-6. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.1.22
  32. Effinger DJ, Tylkowski CM, Rayens MK et al. Gross motor function classification system and outcome tools for assessing ambulatory cerebral palsy: a multicenter study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46(5):311-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2004.tb00491.x
  33. DJ Russell, LM Avery, PL Rosenbaumet al. Improved scaling of the gross motor function measure for children with cerebral palsy: evidence of reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):873-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.9.873
  34. Lee JL, Cho SH, Kwon OY et al. The relevance between gross motor function measurement and the spatiotemporal parameters of gait in children with cerebral palsy. J Kor Phys Ther. 2001;8(1):20-34.
  35. Damiano DL, Abel MF. Relation of gait analysis to gross motor function in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996;38(5):389-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15097.x
  36. Bartlett DJ, Palisano RJ. A multivariate model of determinants of motor change for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2000;80(6):598-614. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.6.598
  37. Kim JG, Lee JW. The effects of family support program on gross motor function, support system, and parenting stress in children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2012;16(4):157-71.