DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Engineering Students' Perception of Speaking Ability and Their Communicative Competence Assessment

공과대학생의 '말하기 능력'에 대한 인식과 평가

  • Hwang, Soonhee (Department of Liberal Arts & Science, Hongik University)
  • Received : 2019.04.26
  • Accepted : 2019.05.23
  • Published : 2019.05.31

Abstract

In addition to technical skills and competencies, communication competence has been identified to be important to engineering students who will be drivers of innovation in a rapidly changing society. Drawing on the previous studies, this research examines the results of an empirical exploration of engineering students' perception of speaking ability and their communicative competence. To date, there has been most of the research conducted on 'writing' (e.g., its educational process, class designs, ability, etc.) for engineering students. However, relatively little attention has been paid to engineering students' speaking ability perception and their competence diagnosis. This study relies on quantitative data obtained from one survey questionnaire and one test conducted respectively. The sample consists of 386 engineering students as well as 481 non-engineering students for the 1st survey. And to measure communicative competence, 150 engineering students as well as 136 non-engineering students participated in the test. Our findings show that firstly, there were significant differences in perception of speaking ability by majors and gender. Whereas there was no difference in the same survey by grade. Secondly, there was a close and significant relationship between sub-factors of speaking ability. Thirdly, there were significant differences in communicative competence by majors. Whereas there was no difference by gender and grade. Fourthly, there was a close and significant relationship between sub-factors of communicative competence. These findings are expected to provide an explanation for the improvement on engineering students' speaking ability and to encourage the participation in extra-curricular activities and programs in engineering school.

Keywords

References

  1. 김소희.조영하(2018). 대학교육에서 온라인학습의 활용 동향과 교수.학습적 함의, 평생학습사회, 14(4), 51-78.
  2. 김안나.이병식(2003). 대학생들의 핵심능력 개발에 영향을 미치는 개인 및 환경요인 분석, 한국교육, 30(1). 367-392.
  3. 김옥분(2018). 학습동아리 교수.학습 방법 적용에 따른 대학생의 문제해결 능력과 의사소통능력 차이 분석, 예술인문사회융합멀티미디어논문지, 8(11), 799-807. https://doi.org/10.35873/AJMAHS.2018.8.11.076
  4. 김은주(2003). 협동학습에서 의사소통 불안 수준이 학업 성취도와 수업만족도에 미치는 영향, 교육심리연구, 17(2), 215-232.
  5. 김지심.최금진.이종연(2010). 공과대학생의 학습양식에 따른 의사소통 불안인식 분석 연구, 공학교육연구, 13(.6), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2010.13.6.3
  6. 김현우.강선영(2018). 대학생 핵심역량 제고를 위한 비교과 교육프로그램 사례, 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(2), 337-357.
  7. 안선경.허경호(2004). 개인의 성격과 의사소통 능력 간의 관계, 한국언론학보, 48(2), 321-345.
  8. 유현숙.고장완.임후남(2011). 대학생의 의사소통능력 및 종합적 사고력에 영향을 주는 학습과정 요인 분석, 교육행정학연구, 29(4), 319-337.
  9. 이효영(2011). 스피치 능력에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 탐색적 연구 : 초등학생 대상 스피치 교육자 심층 인터뷰를 중심으로, 석사학위논문, 성균관대학교 언론정보대학원.
  10. 장선영(2014). 프로젝트 중심학습에서 학습자의 의사소통능력, 리더십, 비판적 사고력, 정보활용능력이 반성적 사고에 미치는 영향. 교육방법연구, 26(3), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2014.26.3.391
  11. 전영미(2015). 공과대학생들의 학습 과정 분석에 기초한 학습지원 방안 연구: 수도권 S대 사례를 중심으로. 공학교육연구, 18(1), 61-73.
  12. 진미석.손유미.주휘정(2011). 대학생 핵심역량 진단체제 구축 방안 연구, 교육행정학연구, 29(4), 461-486.
  13. 최정윤.이병식(2009). 대학생의 학습 성과에 대한 영향 요인 탐색: 대학의 효과 분석을 중심으로, 교육행정학연구, 27(1), 199-222.
  14. 한상우.김완종(2016). 대학생의 의사소통역량이 정보활용능력에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 한국문헌정보학회지, 50(1), 377-394. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.1.377
  15. 함승연(2009). 공대 졸업생들의 공학기초능력 수준과 교육 요구 분석, 대한공업교육학회지, 34(1), 196-209.
  16. 허경호(2003). 포괄적 대인 의사소통 능력 척도개발 및 타당성 검증, 한국언론학보, 47(6), 380-408.
  17. 황순희(2012). 공학인의 스피치 불안과 상관요소 분석: 인구사회학적 변인, 자기효능감, 스피치 능력을 중심으로, 수사학, 17, 199-223.
  18. 황순희(2013). 대학생의 리더십, 의사소통 불안, 의사소통 성향의 관계 연구: 성, 전공, 학년 변인을 중심으로, 국어교육학연구, 48, 345-380.
  19. 황순희(2017). 공과대학생의 팀워크 역량과 사고양식의 관계, 공학교육연구, 20(2), 39-49.
  20. 황순희(2018). 공과대학생의 핵심역량 분석과 비교과 활동의 활용, 공학교육연구, 21(6), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2018.21.6.63
  21. 황순희.윤경미(2016). 공과대학생의 의사소통능력과 사고양식의 관계, 교양교육연구, 10(3), 515-548.
  22. 황순희.주나형.조한나(2019). '동아리' 참가 대학생의 메타인지와 진로적응성 탐색, 교양교육연구, 13(1), 통권 47호, 293-320.
  23. Bartkus, K.R., Nemelka, B., Nemelka, M., & Gardner, P.(2012). Clarifying the meaning of extracurricular activity: A literature review of definitions. American Journal of Business Education 5(6), 693-704. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v5i6.7391
  24. Binkely, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., & Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M.(2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care(Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17-66). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
  25. Clark, G., Marsden, R., Whyatt, J.D., Thompson, L., & Walker, M.(2015). 'It's everything else you do...': Alumni views on extracurricular activities and employability. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415574050
  26. Dalrymple, O., & Evangelou, D.(2006). The role of extracurricular activities in the education of engineers. In International Conference on Engineering Education, 24-30.
  27. de Freitas, C.C.S., Figueiredo, D.A., & Iano, Y.(2013). Inclusion of extracurricular activities and student competitions in the curriculum structure for engineering education: Experience based on the Brazilian reality. In 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 793-800.
  28. Eccles, J.S., & Barber, B.L.(1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band what kind of extracurricular involvement matters?. Journal of adolescent research, 14(1), 10-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558499141003
  29. Furrer, C. & Skinner, E.A.(2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
  30. Hoegl, M. & Gemuenden, H.G.(2001). Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. Organization Science, 12 (4), 435-499. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
  31. Kuh, G.D.(1994). Student Learning Outside the Classroom: Transcending Artificial Boundaries, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 8.
  32. Lee, W. & Lunsford, D.(2007). Communication apprehension in undergraduate engineering students: The influence of the performing arts and related activities. Proceedings 2007 ASEE Conference, Honolulu, HW: ASEE, 1-10.
  33. Lew, M., Mesch, D., Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T.(1986). Components of cooperative learning: Effects of collaborative skills and academic group contingencies on academic achievement and mainstreaming. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(2), 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(86)90019-6
  34. Lunenburg, F.C.(2010). Extracurricular activities. Schooling, 1(1), 1-4.
  35. Lunenburg, F.C., & Ornstein, A.C.(2011). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Cengage Learning.
  36. Mann, L.M.W., & Radcliffe, D.F.(2003). The Development of a Tailored Systems Engineering Process for Extracurricular Student Design Projects. In DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, 645-646.
  37. McCroskey, J.C.(1993), An introduction to rhetorical communication (6th ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  38. Marsh, H.W.(1992). Extracurricular activities: Beneficial extension of the traditional curriculum or subversion of academic goals?. Journal of educational psychology, 84(4), 553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.553
  39. Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G.(1999). The core competence of the corporation. Knowledge and strategy, 41-59.
  40. Prahalad, C.K. & Hamel, G.(2006). The core competence of the corporation. Strategische unternehmungsplanung-strategische unternehmungsführung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 275-292.
  41. P'Rayan, A. & Shetty, R.T.(2008). "Developing engineering students' communication skills by reducing their communication apprehension", English for Specific Purposes World 4(20), 1-24.
  42. Reevy, G.M., Chamberlain, C.J., & Stein, J.(2013). Identifying Collaboration, Teamwork, and Leadership Practices on Campus, Currents in Teaching & Learning, 6(1).
  43. Richmond, V.P. & McCroskey, J.C.(1985), Communication: apprehension, avoidance and effectiveness, Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
  44. Rugarcia, A., Felder, R. M., Woods, D.R., & Stice, J.E.(2000). The Future of Engineering Education I. A Vision for a New Century. Chem. Engr. Education, 34(1), 16-25.
  45. Wentzel, McNamara-Barry, C. & Caldwell, K.A.(2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.195

Cited by

  1. 공과대학생의 일상적 창의성과 창의성 교육의 방향 vol.22, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2019.22.6.40
  2. 공학커뮤니케이션 교과목 운영을 통한 의사소통 역량의 향상도 분석 vol.24, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2021.24.2.41