DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perception Comparison of Fostering Learner-generated Questions by the Questioning Attitude of Engineering Undergraduate Learners

공과대학생의 질문태도에 따른 학습자 질문 활성화 전략에 대한 인식 비교

  • Jung, Youngsook (School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Korea Aerospace University) ;
  • Sung, Jihoon (College of Education, Sungkyul University)
  • 정영숙 (한국항공대학교 인문자연학부) ;
  • 성지훈 (성결대학교 사범대학 교직부)
  • Received : 2019.05.07
  • Accepted : 2019.05.23
  • Published : 2019.05.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare learners' perceptions regarding the processes and the educational effects of fostering learner-generated questions in engineering education according to the questioning attitude of engineering learners. For this, after developing and implementing the appropriate strategies for fostering learner-generated questions in an engineering statistics course, this study analyzed 56 learners' survey responses and used ANOVA to investigate the group differences. The results showed that the educational effects and implications of fostering learner-generated questions were different according to the learners' questioning attitude. The study also confirmed that learners' questioning attitude should be considered as one of the important learner's characteristics in developing and implementing the strategies of fostering learner-generated questions in engineering education. Especially, fostering learner-generated questions produced positive effects on the passive questioning learners but not particularly on the learners who were asking no questions at all in other courses. Learners who asked no questions still have difficulty in generating deep meaningful questions and presenting them and thus require more instructors' strategies and active support for them.

Keywords

References

  1. 권성호.신동욱.강경희(2008). 해외 공학교육 사례분석을 통한 교수학습 전략 탐색. 공학교육연구, 11(3), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2008.11.3.12
  2. 김수란(2014). 대학 수업에서 학습자 질문저해요인 척도 타당화 연구. 열린교육연구, 22(3), 249-271.
  3. 김수란.송인섭(2014). 대학 수업에서 질문저해요인과 실제 질문과의 관계에서 교수자 긍정적 지지의 조절효과. 교육방법연구, 27(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2015.27.2.195
  4. 류지헌.조형정.윤수정(2007). 학습자 질문 생성에 영향을 주는 요인탐색. 교육연구, 30, 109-129.
  5. 양미경(2013). 교육과정 및 교수방법, 교육과학사.
  6. 우정희.유재용.박주영(2015). 대학생의 질문수준, 질문과정 및 질문저해요인. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 15(12), 335-346.
  7. 이희원(2018). CDIO 기준과 한국 공학교육 인증기준의 비교. 공학교육연구, 21(3), 3-11.
  8. 임경화.안정현(2016). 공학생의 문제해결력 향상을 위한 질문 생성 전략 활용 플립러닝 수업 설계. 실천공학교육논문지, 8(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2016.075
  9. 임지영.김세용(2019). 공학교육에서 교수 으뜸원리를 적용한 플립러닝 모델 및 교수전략에 관한 연구. 공학교육연구, 22(1), 39-47.
  10. 정영숙.성지훈(2018). 대학 강의식 수업에서 질문 작성 중심의 학습자 질문 활성화 전략에 대한 교육적 효과 인식. 교육문제연구, 31(2), 145-173.
  11. 최경희(2004). 교사와 학습자의 의사소통 수단으로서의 질문 노트 활용. 현대영어교육, 5(1), 184-205.
  12. 한국교육개발원(2010). 한국 대학생의 학습과정 분석 연구. RR 2010-17 연구보고.
  13. 홍경선(2012). 설계기반연구방법을 적용한 학생생성 질문촉진 수업모형 개발 연구. 지역발전연구, 11(2), 215-245.
  14. 홍경선.김동익(2011). 공학교육에서 학생 생성 질문 교수학습 방법을 적용한 수업사례연구. 공학교육연구, 14(6), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2011.14.6.24
  15. 황청일.임호용(2011). 대학 수업에서 학습자 질문과정과 저해 요인 탐색 연구. 아시아교육연구, 12(3), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.15753/AJE.2011.12.3.003
  16. Christie, M., & Graaff, E.(2017). The philosophical and pedagogical understanding of active learning in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1254160
  17. Dillon, J. T.(1990). The Practice of questioning, New York: Routledge.
  18. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (eds.)(2006). 대학의 최신 교수-학습 방법(2nd Ed.). 전남대학교 교육발전연구원 공역. 서울: 학지사.
  19. Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. A.(2003). How does one know whether person understands a device? the quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 524-536. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.524
  20. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K.(1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031001104
  21. Jesus, H., & Moreira, A.(2009). The role of students' questions in aligning teaching, learning and assessment: a case study from undergraduate sciences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955952
  22. Jin, S., & Shin, S.(2012). The effect of teacher feedback to students' question-asking in large-sized engineering classes: a perspective of instructional effectiveness and efficiency. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(3), 497-506.
  23. Meij, H. V. D.(1994). Student questioning: a componential analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(2), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(94)90007-8
  24. Pedrosa de Jesus, H. et al.(2007). Where learners' questions meet modes of teaching: a study of cases. Research in Education, 78, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.78.2

Cited by

  1. 복습게임을 활용한 공학이론 수업의 설계 및 운영 사례 vol.24, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2021.24.4.52