Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Researcher's Needs from KISTI Content Curation

KISTI 콘텐츠 큐레이션에 대한 연구자들의 요구

  • 이혜림 (한국과학기술정보연구원 콘텐츠 큐레이션 센터)
  • Received : 2020.11.16
  • Accepted : 2020.12.25
  • Published : 2020.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Content curation aims to limit the user's experience to the most necessary content; to do this, it is necessary to identify users' information needs. Given that KISTI's Content Curation Center was established in 2018, it had little information about its users. This study intends to investigate what content scientists want to see from KISTI and how they want it curated. It investigated researchers who worked for government-funded research institutes through online surveys and telephone interviews. This study's results helped me review the current practice of KISTI content curation and give some suggestions to improve future practice. They present information on content and content curation services required by researchers; therefore, they can be used as a reference for information agencies (e.g., libraries, data centers) to improve their content curation practices.

콘텐츠 큐레이션의 목표는 콘텐츠의 홍수 속에서 이용자들이 필요로 하는 콘텐츠를 용이하게 검색할 수 있도록 콘텐츠를 분류, 조직, 배포하는 것인 데, 이를 위해서는 먼저 이용자들의 정보요구를 파악할 필요가 있다. KISTI 콘텐츠 큐레이션 센터는 2018년에 설립되었기 때문에 콘텐츠 이용자들에 대한 정보가 부족했다. 본 연구의 목적은 과학기술분야의 연구자들이 KISTI에게 어떤 콘텐츠를 원하고 KISTI가 그러한 콘텐츠를 어떻게 큐레이션 하기를 바라는 지 조사하는 것이었다. 이를 위해 국가과학기술연구회에 속한 24개 정부출연연구 기관에 연구 참여 요청을 하였고, 그 중 자발적으로 참여한 8개 기관의 연구자들을 대상으로 온라인 설문과 전화 인터뷰를 실시하였다. 그 조사 결과를 바탕으로 현재의 KISTI 콘텐츠 큐레이션 실무를 검토하고 개선할 수 있는 방안을 제안하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 과학기술 분야의 연구자들이 요구하는 콘텐츠와 콘텐츠 큐레이션 서비스에 대한 정보를 제공하므로, 이러한 결과는 정보기관들(도서관, 데이터 센터 등)의 콘텐츠 큐레이션 실무를 향상시키는 데 참고자료로 사용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajou University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation. 2018. User Behavior Analysis for Intelligent Curation Service. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  2. Choi, Eun-Ju and Seon-Hee Lee. 2004. "A Study on the Collaborative Digital Reference Service: Focused on the Implementation of Question Point at KISTI." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 21(2): 69-88. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.069
  3. Choi, Woo-Seok and Dong-Woo Yang. 2014. "A Comparative Study on the Information Use Patterns of Science & Technology Researchers." Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 15(4): 1946-1952. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.4.1946
  4. Choi, Yong Soo et al. 2014. "User Needs Survey and Analysis for Development of National R&D Information Navigation Service: A Focus on Patent Knowledge Map and Mobile App Development." Digital Design Study, 14(1): 641-650. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2014.14.1.063
  5. Chungnam National University. 2006. NDSL User Information Request and Usage Analysis. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  6. Hoseo University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation. 2007. 2007 KISTI Customer Satisfaction Survey and Service Improvement Plan Research Report. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  7. Hoseo University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation. 2013. A Study on the Demand and Use Behavior of Science and Technology Information. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  8. Hu, Doo-Yong. 2016. Content Curation: Content Market Accessed by Experts and Big Data. Seoul: BP Technology Trade.
  9. Hyun, Mi-Hwan et al. 2014. NOS User Satisfaction and In-depth Interview Survey Report to Promote the Use of Science and Technology Public Data. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  10. Jeong, Yion-Il et al. 2005. "A Study on Customer's Satisfaction and Economic Valuation Model of Information Analysis Report." Information Management Study, 36(3): 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2005.36.3.167
  11. Kim, En-Jin and Young-Ho Lee. 2014. "User-Oriented Science and Technology Information Service Policy by Analyzing Korean Science and Technology Information Use Behavior." Science and Technology Policy, 24(3/4): 78-92.
  12. Kim, Sangguk. 2016. "A Study on the Information Needs and Using Behavior of Science-Technology Information Users." Proceedings of Korea Society of Computer Information, 24(2): 65-67.
  13. Kim, Yong Ryeol. 2003. An Analysis of User Needs for Improving Document Delivery Service in Science and Technology: With the Focus on KISTI. Master's thesis, Hansung Univ., Library abd Information Science.
  14. Kim, Yong Ryeol and Su-Hyeon Yoo. 2009. "An Analysis of User Satisfaction on STI Document Delivery Service." Korea Contents Association 2009 Spring Conference, 7(1): 1195-1199.
  15. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. 2019a. KISTI Symbol Mark. [cited 2019. 12. 1].
  16. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. 2019b. ScienceOn. [cited 2019. 12. 1].
  17. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. Content Curation Center. 2019. Presentation Material-Yearly Performance Planning (2019-2020) Assessment Material, [Slide].
  18. Kwon, Hyeog-In et al. 2015. "A Study of a Personalized Curation Service and Business Model Based on Book Information." Journal of Information Technology Services, 14(1): 251-262. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2015.14.1.251
  19. Lee, Byeong-Hee and Kang-Ryul Shon. 2013. "User Needs Analysis and Information Visualization of National R&D Information Navigation Service for Improving Usability." Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 13(2): 512-521. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.02.512
  20. Lee, Jeong-Gu et al. 2006. "A Study on the Information Needs and Using Behavior of Science-Technology Information Users of the KISTI." Proceeding of 2006 Korea Contents Association Conference, 4(2): 95-99.
  21. Myongji University. 2011. Korean Scientists' R&D Life Cycle Study. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  22. Nam, Yeon-Hwa et al. 2015. "A Study on Advanced Visualization Methods Based on Information Needs Analysis according to NTIS General Users Groups." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(1): 361-382. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.201603.361
  23. Seoul Women's University. 2012. Korean Science and Technology Scientists' R&D Lifecycle Study. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  24. Tae, Ja-Woon, Yu-Jung Sim, and Yeon-Ji Kang. 2019. Digital Content Curation Service Case Study and Service Plan Research. Sejong: Korea Special Library Association.
  25. Yong In University. Department of Computer and Information. 2002. KISTI User Satisfaction Survey and Economic Valuation. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  26. Yonsei University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation. 2006. Research on the Behavior and Needs of Science and Technology Information Resources. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  27. Yoo, Sa-Rah. 2002. "User-Oriented Evaluation of NDSL Information Service." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(1): 25-40. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.1.025
  28. Yoon, Cheong-Ok. 2001. "A Study on the Information-Seeking Behavior of ST Information Users of the KISTI." Information Management Study, 32(2): 1-25.
  29. Yoon, Cheong-Ok. 2002. "Information Environment of ST Information Users of the KISTI with the Focus on Document Delivery." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(2): 5-24. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.2.005
  30. Bhargava, Rohit. 2011. The 5 Models of Content Curation. [cited 2019. 12. 10].
  31. Brudy, Frederik et al. 2016. "CurationSpace: Cross-Device Content Curation Using Instrumental Interaction." ISS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, 159-168.
  32. Cannon, San. 2015. "Content Curation for Research: A Framework for Building a Data Museum." International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(2): 58-68. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.355
  33. Dale, Stephen. 2014. "Content Curation: The Future of Relevance." Business Information Review, 31(4): 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382114564267
  34. Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd ed. CA: Sage Publications.
  35. Li, Chung-Sheng, Guangleri Xiong, and Emmanuel Munguia Tapia. 2018. "New Frontiers in Cognitive Content Curation and Moderation." APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, 7: 1-11.
  36. Mullan, Eileen. 2011. "What is Content Curation?" E-Content Magazine. November 30. [cited 2019. 11. 1].
  37. Pappas, Christopher. 2016. 7 Tips to Curate Amazing eLearning Content. [cited 2019. 12. 3].
  38. Rotman, Dana et al. 2012. "Supporting Content Curation Communities: The Case of the Encyclopedia of Life." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6): 1092-1107. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22633
  39. Tharanga Dilruk Ranasinghe, W. M., and Jun Min Chung. 2019. "Understanding the Curation Service in Libraries: Is It a Revolution or an Evolution of Reference Service?" 한국도서관.정보학회지, 50(2): 215-235.
  40. Zhong, Changtao et al. 2013. "Sharing the Loves: Understanding the How and Why of Online Content Curation." Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 659-667.