Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회지)

Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Archive Description Using RiC-CM

RiC-CM을 적용한 영구기록물 기술방안 연구

  • Received : 2020.01.22
  • Accepted : 2020.02.11
  • Published : 2020.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to examine the limitations of status that describe archives based on the Archival rules, and to propose a new method using the Records in Context - Conceptual model (RiC-CM) as a solution. Given this, the study conducted literature reviews and case studies. The solutions based on RiC-CM and its effects on the limitations of the existing environment are as follows. First, RiC-CM can describe multiple provenances about archives. This can be solved by defining individual records and provenances as "entity" and expressing their associations as relationships. The interrelation of entities alone can more accurately represent the information of provenances associated with a particular archive, making it easier to identify the overall context that makes records. Second, RiC-CM can link related files. Those that belong to a specific records group (fonds) can be resolved by assigning them to individual entities and making interrelation according to the context that makes records. This method makes it possible to serve information about the context that makes records. From the user's point of view, more options are available for searching records. Third, RiC-CM can link all relevant producer-made records related to a specific production organization. If organizations are related to each other, they can be defined as "entity," and their relationship can be expressed as "associated with." It helps to comprehensively examine the context of provenances. The findings of this study are expected to be used as a basis for future research on RiC-CM, in response to the paradigm shift for electronic records management systems.

본 연구는 영구기록물기술규칙 기반의 기술현황이 갖는 한계점을 살펴보고, 이에 대한 해결방안으로 RiC-CM(Record in Context - Conceptual model)을 적용한 영구기록물 기술방안을 제안하는데 그 목적을 두었다. 이를 위해 문헌연구와 사례연구를 진행하였다. 국가기록원 영구기록원 기술현황의 한계에 대한 RiC-CM 기반의 해결방안과 그에 대한 효과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, RiC-CM는 특정 영구기록물이 복수 출처맥락을 반영하는 것이 가능하다. 이는 기록물과 각각의 출처를 개체로 정의하고 이들의 연관성을 관계로 표현하는 방식으로 해결할 수 있다. 기록물 개체들의 관계를 맺어주는 것만으로도 특정 영구기록물과 관련된 출처정보를 보다 정확히 표현 가능하고, 전체적인 생산맥락을 파악하기 용이하다. 둘째, RiC-CM는 연관이 있는 기록물 철·건 정보를 연계하는 것이 가능하다. 특정 기록물 군(퐁)에 속하는 하위 기록물 철·건들은 각각 개체로 지정하고, 생산맥락에 따른 관계를 부여하는 방식으로 해결할 수 있다. 이를 통해 실제 서비스를 제공할 때 연관된 영구기록물들의 정보를 한데모아 서비스하는 것이 가능하다. 그리고 이용자 입장에서는 영구기록물 검색의 폭을 넓힐 수 있다. 셋째, RiC-CM은 특정 생산기관과 연관된 모든 생산기관 정보를 연계하는 것이 가능하다. 만약 복수의 생산기관들이 서로 연관되어 있다면, 생산기관들을 각각의 개체로 정의하고 이들 간의 관계를 '연관이 있다(associated with)'로 표현할 수 있다. 이를 통해 생산기관의 맥락정보, 즉 기록의 출처맥락을 종합적으로 살펴보는데 도움이 된다. 본 연구를 통해 전자기록 관리환경의 패러다임 변화에 대응하여, 차세대 영구기록물 기술규칙인 RiC-CM에 대한 연구에 활용될 수 있기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. National Archives of Korea (2011). NAK/S 14:2011. Archival Description Rules. version 2.0.
  2. Park, Zi-young (2016). Analyzing the Next-generation Archival Description Standard: "Record in Context" of ICA EGAD. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management,16(1), 223-245. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.223
  3. Park, Zi-young (2017a). Transition of Archival Description from ISA D(G) to Record in Context Conceptual Model. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(1), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.093
  4. Park, Zi-young (2017b). Improving Archival Descriptive Standard Based on the Analysis of the Reviews by Archival Communities on RiC-CM Draft. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 54, 81-109. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2017.54.081
  5. Seol, Moon-won (2010). A Study on Development and Prospects of Archival Finding Aids. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 23, 3-43. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2010.23.003
  6. Seol, Moon-won (2012). Research Trends and Issues of Records and Archives Classification in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 12(3), 203-232. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2012.12.3.203
  7. Seol, Moon-won (2013). Research Trends and Issues of Records and Archives Classification in Korea. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(4), 23-51. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.4.023
  8. Seol, Moon-won (2017). An Analysis of Discourses on Interpreting and Applying the Principle of Provenance in Archival Organization. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 52, 60-119. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2017.52.060
  9. Shin, Mi-ra (2019). A Study on the Data Modeling for Archive System applying RiC. Master's thesis, Myongji UniversityGraduate School, Seoul.
  10. Lee, Dae-yeol (2014). Study on Archival Objects Management Using CIDOC-CRM. Master's thesis, Myongji University Graduate School, Seoul.
  11. Lee, Chang-min (2015). A study on description for performing arts resources based on multiple provenance, Hansung University Graduate School, Seoul.
  12. Rieh, Hae-young (2013). Record Organization. Seoul: SuninBook.
  13. Korean Society of Archives & Records Management (2010). Records & archives management. Seongnam: Acp.
  14. Korean Society of Archival Studies (2008). Dictionary of Records and Archival Terminolog. Seoul: Yukbi.
  15. Hyun, Moon-soo, Seol, Moon-won (2018). An Exploration of the Direction of Development of the Next Generation Conceptual Model for Organizing Public Digital Records. Korean Journal of Archival Studies, (56), 183-212. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2018.56.183
  16. Bak, Greg. (2012). Continuous classification: Capturing dynamic relationships among information resources, Archival Science, 12(3), 287-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9171-8
  17. Gueguen, G., da Fonseca, V., Pitti, D., & Grimoüard, C. (2013). Toward an International Conceptual Model for Archival Description: A Preliminary Report from the International Council on Archives' Experts Group on Archival Description. The American Archivist, 76(2), 567-584. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.p071x02401282qx2
  18. Llanes-Padron, D. & Pastor-Sanchez, J. A. (2017). Records in contexts: The road of archives to semantic interoperability. Program, 51(4), 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-03-2017-0021
  19. Pitti, D, Stocking, B, Clavaud, Florence (2016). An introduction to "Records in Contexts": an archival description draft standard. Comma, Vol. 2016 Issue: 1-2, 173-188. https://doi.org/10.3828/comma.2016.18
  20. Popovici, Bogdan Florin (2016). RECORDS IN CONTEXTS - Towards a New Level in Archival Description?. Tehnicni in vsebinski problemi klasicnega in elektronskega arhiviranja, Radenci, 13-31.
  21. Terry Eastwood and Heatehr Macneil (2017). Currents of Archival Thinking, 2nd edition. Libraries Unlimited.
  22. Thibodeau, K. (2016). Breaking Down the Invisible Wall to Enrich Archival Science and Practice. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2016.7840986
  23. Yeo, Geoffrey (2015). Contexts, original orders, and item-level orientation: Responding creatively to users' needs and technological change. Journal of Archival Organization, 12(3-4), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2015.1048626
  24. National Archives of Korea. Retrieved 2019.10.07., from http://www.archives.go.kr/
  25. National Science & Technology Information Service. Retrieved 2019.10.06., from https://www.ntis.go.kr/
  26. ICA EGAD. Records in Context - Compendium. Retrieved 2019.10.07., from https://web.esrc.unimelb.edu.au/ICAD/
  27. ICA. RiC-O: Extended Call for reviewers. 2019. Retrieved 2019.11.18., from https://www.ica.org/en/ric-o-extended-call-for-reviewers-closed