Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of an SSI-based Program for Engineering College Students on Character and Values

공과대학 학생을 위한 과학기술관련 사회·윤리 쟁점기반 수업이 인성과 가치관에 미치는 효과 탐색

  • Lee, Hyunok (Center for Educational Research, Seoul National University)
  • 이현옥 (서울대학교 교육종합연구원)
  • Received : 2020.03.16
  • Accepted : 2020.05.16
  • Published : 2020.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study explores the effects of an SSI-based program focused on character and values for engineering college students. The participants were fifty-four students enrolled in the program. Data sources include the students' responses to the Likert-type questionnaire on character and values as well as qualitative data such as classroom dialogues, assignment essays and field notes. The results indicate that the program significantly contributed to the enhancement of the engineering college students' perception of character and values, especially in the sub-components, sustainable development, perspective-taking, and willingness to act. In addition, the qualitative data reveals the nuances of the students' responses in the classroom dialogue and essays related to the sub-components. Based on the results, the author compares the participants' responses to other students in previous research which reported the effects of an SSI-based program on character and values. Compared to the other students, the engineering students in this study cultivated willingness to act through the SSI-based program, without improvement in most of the emotional aspects of character and values.

Keywords

References

  1. 고연주.이현주(2017). 과학관련 사회쟁점을 활용한 대학생 인성교육의 효과-개인-집단중심성향에 따른 비교. 한국과학교육학회지, 37(3), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.3.395
  2. 고인석(2010). 공학윤리교육의 지향점과 방법. 철학논총, 59, 3-23.
  3. 김가형.이현주(2017). 지역사회연계 미세먼지 교육프로그램이 중학생들의 이슈에 대한 이해와 시민으로서의 인성과 가치관 함양에 미치는 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 37(6), 911-920. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.6.911
  4. 김진하(2016). 제4차 산업혁명시대, 미래사회 변화에 대한 전략적 대응방안 모색. KISTEPR&DInI,(15), 45-59.
  5. 송성수.김병윤(2001). 공학윤리의 흐름과 쟁점. 유네스코한국위원회편, 과학연구윤리, 당대, 173-204.
  6. 이소이 외(2005). 공과대학의 공학윤리 교육과정 운영 실태조사. 공학교육연구, 8(2), 35-51.
  7. 이재숭(2008). 공학윤리 교육의 필요성 및 교육내용과 방법. 윤리교육연구, 16, 229-244.
  8. 이재숭(2011). 공학인증과 공학윤리. 윤리교육연구, 26, 277-296.
  9. 이현옥.이향연(2019). 대학생의 전공계열 및 성별 집단에 따 른 과학기술관련 인성과 가치관에 대한 특성 탐색. 교육과학연구, 50(3), 107-130.
  10. 이현주.최윤희.고연주(2014). 집단지성 원리를 적용한 과학관련 사회. 윤리적 쟁점 수업 모형의 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 34(6), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0523
  11. 한경희.허준행.이충용(2009). 공학 윤리 교육: 현황과 쟁점, 그리고 전략. 공학교육연구, 12(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2009.12.1.31
  12. 한경희(2014). 공학교육과 과학기술학 (STS) 의 학제적 협력 방안 탐색. 공학교육연구, 17(2), 50-58.
  13. Amador, J. A., Miles, L. & Peters, C. B.(2007). The practice of problem-based learning. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co.
  14. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS](1990). Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  15. Choi, K. et al.(2011). Re‐conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
  16. Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D.(2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
  17. Gul, M. D., & Akcay, H.(2020). Structuring a new socioscientific issues (SSI) based instruction model: Impacts on pre-service science teachers'(PSTs) critical thinking skills and dispositions. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 141-159.
  18. Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J.(2005). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases. Stamford. CT: Thomson Wadsworth.
  19. Herkert, J. R.(2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3), 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0062-2
  20. Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D.(2010). Multi‐level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues‐based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017-1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902894512
  21. Levinson, R.(2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio‐scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201-1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753
  22. Lee, H. et al.(2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers' moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
  23. Lee, H. et al.(2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
  24. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G.(1985). Naturalist inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  25. National Research Council [NRC](2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  26. Presley, M. L. et al.(2013). A framework for socio-scientific issues based education. Science Educator, 22(1), 26-32.
  27. Prisecaru, P.(2016). Challenges of the fourth industrial revolution. Knowledge Horizons. Economics, 8(1), 57.
  28. Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W.(2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2). Routledge Handbooks Online, 559-572.
  29. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L.(2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
  30. Schwab, K.(2017). The Fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business.
  31. Topcu, M. S., Sadler, T. D., & Yilmaz‐Tuzun, O.(2010). Preservice science teachers' informal reasoning about socioscientific issues: The influence of issue context. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2475-2495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903524779
  32. Vesilind, P. A.(1995). Evolution of the American society of civil engineers code of ethics. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 121(1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1995)121:1(4)
  33. World Economic Forum(2016). The future of jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Geneva, Switzerland.
  34. Yadav, A. et al.(2007). Teaching science with case studies: A national survey of faculty perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using cases. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(1), 34-38.
  35. Zeidler, D. L., et al.(2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
  36. Zeidler, D. L. et al.(2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281
  37. Zeidler, D. L.(2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Routledge, 697-726.
  38. Zo'bi, A. S.(2014). The effect of using socio-scientific issues approach in teaching environmental issues on improving the students' ability of making appropriate decisions towards these issues. International Education Studies, 7(8), 113-123.
  39. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F.(2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008