Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회지)

Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Process of Semicurrent Records Management in the United States: A Focus on Records Transfer and Appraisal in the Federal Records Center

미국 준현용 기록관리 프로세스에 관한 연구: 연방레코드센터의 기록 이관과 평가를 중심으로

  • 조애란 (전북대학교 대학원 기록관리학과) ;
  • 양동민 (전북대학교 대학원 기록관리학과, 문화융복합아카이빙연구소) ;
  • 윤은하 (전북대학교 대학원 기록관리학과, 문화융복합아카이빙연구소)
  • Received : 2020.07.24
  • Accepted : 2020.08.09
  • Published : 2020.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Semicurrent records are documents that are stored and managed in a separate section because they are infrequently referred to in work. The semicurrent records management stage is when records from the processing department are collected for the first time, serving as a bridge between the current and noncurrent records. For systematic records management, records management at the semicurrent stage is vital. Although Korea has established numerous records centers, various problems remain in the records management environment. In response, this study examines the United States' semicurrent records management system and discusses the features that are different from that of Korea. For this purpose, the records management system of the United States was selected as the scope of research and is analyzed through its records schedule, transfer, and appraisal. The data for the research were obtained through the relevant records management law, guidelines compiled by related agencies, and written inquiries for the records management officer. Through these methods, this study was able to identify the relationship between the federal agency and the Federal Records Center, the introduction of new technology in the aspect of transfers, the privatization of records preservation, and the status of the Federal Records Center as a passive appraisal entity.

준현용 기록은 업무에서 자주 참고하지 않아 별도의 장소에 기록을 보관하고 관리하는 기록이다. 준현용 기록관리 단계는 처리과의 기록물이 처음으로 모이는 시점이면서 현용기록과 비현용기록을 이어주는 가교 역할을 수행한다. 체계적인 기록관리를 위해서 준현용 단계의 기록관리는 매우 중요하다. 한국은 많은 기록관리 인프라가 조성되었지만 여전히 기록관리환경에서 다양한 문제점이 존재한다. 이에 미국의 준현용 기록관리체계를 고찰하고 한국의 준현용 기록관리체계와 다른 특징은 무엇이 있는지 논의하고자 한다. 이를 위해 미국의 연방 기록관리체계를 연구 범위로 선정하였으며 기록처분일정, 이관, 평가로 나누어 논의하였다. 연구의 데이터는 기록관리법과 유관기관에서 편찬한 지침, 기록관리담당자와의 서면 질의를 통해 얻었다. 연구 결과, 기록 생산기관과 준현용 기록관리기관과의 관계성, 이관측면에서의 신기술 도입, 기록보존의 민영화, 소극적 평가주체로서의 연방레코드센터 등을 파악할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, Da-Yeon & Kim, Sang Hyun (2020). A study on the importance priority of expected Effect Factors in the Introduction of Cloud Computing Service. Jounal of the korea contents association, 20, 564-570.
  2. Kwag, Jeong (2007). Metadata for records management in the current and semi-current stages. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 16, 3-37.
  3. National Archives of Korea (2015). Management and Disposition of the Federal Government Records. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  4. National Archives of Korea (2018). National Archives of Korea White Paper 2018. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  5. Kim, Cho-Hyun (2007). A study on the combined service of public records: focusing on the introduction of cloud computing. Unpublished master's thesis, The Graduate school of Archival Science Myoungji University.
  6. Bang, Hyo-Soon (2003). A Study on the Roles and Characteristics of Record Center(Jaryokwan) in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 37, 187-205. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2003.37.2.187
  7. Seo, Eun-Gyoung (2005). A Comparative Study on Appraisal Policies of National Archives of UK, USA, Canada, and Australia. Journal of information management, 36(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2005.36.4.001
  8. Seol, Moon-Won (2006). Redesigning Retention Schedules for Accurate Documentation of Government Activities. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40, 199-219. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.4.199
  9. Seol, Moon-Won (2009). An Evaluation of the Standardization of Records Management. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(3), 355-377. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.3.355
  10. Seol, Moon-Won & Lee, Seung-eok (2020). Major Issues and Tasks of Restructuring Public Records Appraisal System. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(1), 47-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.1.047
  11. Yu, Young-Moon (2019). A Study on the Current Status of the Central Government's Cloud System Adoption. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 19(3), 247-270. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2019.19.3.247
  12. Lee, Mi-Hwa (2006). A Study on Records Center's Appraisal of Records and Improvement: Focused on Organization A's Example. Unpublished master's thesis, The Graduate school of Chungnam National University, Department of Archival Science.
  13. Lee, Sang-Min (2000). The principles of Electronic Records Management: The foundation of E-Government. Archives, 13, 119-144.
  14. Lee, Sang-Min (2001). The Selections and Appraisal of Archival Records. Archives, 14, 87-119.
  15. Lee, Young-Nam (2005). Reorganization and Chracteristic of the National Administrative Structure on Korea 1950s and Early 1960s (1957-1963). Unpublished doctor's thesis, The Graduate school of SoGang University, Department of Korea History.
  16. Lee, Won kyu (1998). The theory of public records scheduling: in comparison with foreign records management cases. Archives, 11, 77-107.
  17. Choi, Jae-Hee (2014). A Survey on Archival Appraisal System and Practice in Korea as Well as Its Modification. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 14(4), 153-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.153
  18. Hyun, Moon-Soo (2019). A Study on the Distribution of Authorities and Responsibilities to Appraise Records of Central or Federal Governments in Britain, the USA, Canada, and Australia. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 19(4), 175-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2019.19.4.175
  19. James M. O'Tool (1990). Understanding Archives and Manuscripts. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
  20. Randall C. Jimerson (2009). Archives Power: Memory, Accountability, and Social Justice. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
  21. Ave Point, Inc. (2018). Best Practices Guide: Records Management for the Digital Era.
  22. BRIDG (2014) ERA Updates: Traning and the Annual Move of Permanent Records to NARA.
  23. FRC (2009). ARCIS USER MANUAL.
  24. FRC (2011). ARCIS USER ADMINISTRATION.
  25. FRC (2012). ARCIS REOCRDS TRANSFERS USER'S MANUAL.
  26. FRC (2014). ARCIS Training Workbook.
  27. FRC (2020). Federal Records Center Toolkit.
  28. NARA (2003). Appraisal Policy of the National Archives and Records Administration.
  29. NARA (2013). ERA AGENCY USER MANUAL.
  30. NARA (2018). 2018-2022 Strategic Plan.
  31. NARA (2020). The General Records Schedules (Transmittal No.31).
  32. 한국 공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률.
  33. 한국 공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률 시행령.
  34. 한국 공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률 시행규칙.
  35. 미국 국립기록관리청법(National Archives and Records Administrations).
  36. 미국 국립기록관리청장과 총무청장관에 의한 기록물관리법(Records Management by The Archivist of the United States and by the Administratior of General Services).
  37. 미국 연방기관의 기록물관리법(Records Management by Federal Agencies).
  38. 미국 기록물처분법(Disposal of Records).
  39. 미국 미 연방규정집(Code of Federal Regulations) 36: National Archives and Records Administrations
  40. NAK 4:2012(v2.1) 기록관리기준표 작성 및 관리절차.
  41. NAK 5-1:2014(v2.2) 기록물평가.폐기절차-제1부: 기록관용.
  42. NAK 10:2012(v1.1) 기록관표준운영절차: 일반.
  43. NAK 11-1:2011(v1.1) 기록관 및 특수기록관 시설.환경표준.
  44. NAK 16-1:2012(v1.1) 기록물공개관리업무-제1부: 기록물생산부서 및 기록관.
  45. MeriTalk, 2020.02.05. 새 클라우드 플랫폼을 찾고 있는 미국 국립기록관리청. 검색일자: 2020. 06. 11. https://www.meritalk.com/articles/nara-seeking-new-cloud-platform-for-records-management/
  46. Records Nations, 2019.08.16. 하이브리드 기록관리 솔루션. 검색일자: 2020. 06. 16. https://www.recordnations.com/2016/07/hybrid -records-management-solutions/