The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the factors of situational interest in learning mathematics

수학 학습에 대한 상황적 흥미 요인 탐색

  • Received : 2021.10.14
  • Accepted : 2021.11.19
  • Published : 2021.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the factors of situational interest in math learning, and based on the results, to reveal the factors of situational interest included in teaching and learning methods, teaching and learning activities in mathematics class, and extracurricular activities outside of class. As a result of conducting a questionnaire to high school students, the factors of situational interest in learning mathematics were divided into 10 detail-domain(Enjoy, Curiosity, Competence / Real life, Other subjects, Career / Prior knowledge, Accumulation knowledge / Transformation, Analysis), 4 general-domain(Emotion, Attitude / Knowledge, Understanding), 2 higher-domain(Affective / Cognitive) were extracted. In addition, it was revealed that various factors of situational interest were included teaching and learning methods, teaching and learning activities and extracurricular activities. When examining the meaning of 10 situational interest factors, it can be expected that the factors for developing individual interest are included, so it can be expected to serve as a basis for expanding the study on the development of individual interest in mathematics learning. In addition, in order to maintain individual interest continuously, it is necessary to maintain situational interest by seeking continuous changes in teaching and learning methods in the school field. Therefore, it can be seen that the process of exploring the contextual interest factors included in teacher-centered teaching and learning methods and student-centered teaching and learning activities and extracurricular activities is meaningful.

본 연구의 목적은 수학 학습에 대한 상황적 흥미 요인을 탐색하고, 이 결과를 바탕으로 수학 수업 내의 교수·학습 방법과 교수·학습 활동 및 수업 외의 비교과 활동에 포함되어 있는 상황적 흥미 요인을 밝히는 것이다. 고등학생들을 대상으로 설문을 실시한 결과 수학 학습에 대한 상황적 흥미의 요인은 10개의 세부영역(즐거움, 호기심, 유능감/ 실생활, 타교과, 진로/ 사전 지식, 지식의 축적/ 변환, 해석), 4개의 일반영역(정서, 태도/ 지식, 이해), 2개의 고차영역(정의/인지)으로 추출되었다. 또한 교수·학습 방법과 교수·학습 활동 및 비교과 활동에는 상황적 흥미의 다양한 요인이 포함되어 있음을 밝혔다. 10개의 수학 학습에 대한 상황적 흥미 요인에 개인적 흥미로 발달에 필요한 요인이 공유되어 있었고, 이러한 연구 결과는 수학 학습 흥미 발달에 관한 연구로 확장될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 성균관대학교의 2020학년도 성균학술연구비에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. Alexander, P. A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp.273-298). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
  2. An, J. S. (2019). The effects of the students' interest in mathematics and academic achievement by applying the teams games tournaments correction model. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(13), 89-121. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.13.89
  3. Anderson, R. C., Shirey, L. L., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1987). Interestingness of children's reading material. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction: Vol. 3. Cognitive and affective process analyses (pp. 287-299). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  4. Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3402_2
  5. Bishop, A. J. (2008). Teachers' mathematical values for developing mathemtatical thinking in classrooms: Theroy, research and policy. The mathematics Educationr, 11(1/2), 79-88.
  6. Bloom, B. (1985). The nature of the study and why it was done. In B. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 3-18). New York: Ballantine.
  7. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
  8. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Boston: Harvard University press.
  9. Byun, Y. K. (2005). Understanding Teaching and Learning Theory. Seoul: hakjisa.
  10. Chang, J. Y., Kim, J. Y., & Park, I. W. (2017). Undergraduate Students' Identification of Types, Performance and Effectiveness of Teaching-Learning Activities in Class. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 29(2), 371-396. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2017.29.2.371
  11. Chavez, O. (2006). From the textbook to the enacted curriculum Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America XXVIII. Yucatan, Mexico.
  12. Choe, M. J. (2004). Inquiry of meaning on Learner-Centered Instructional Design. Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction, 93-114.
  13. Choi, J. S. (2020). Theoretical conceptualizations of Educational Interest Focused on Mathematics Learning. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 23(1), 1-23.
  14. Choi, J. S., & Sang, K. A. (2019). The Effects of Educational Context Variables on Achievement and Interest in Mathematics in High and Low Achieving Students. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 22(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2019.22.2.004
  15. Choi, K. H., & Han, H. S. (2013). A study on the effects of the reciprocal peer tutoring in high school students' affective characteristics of mathematics. The Korea Society of Mathematical Education, The Mathematical Education, 52(3), 423-442.
  16. Choi, M. S., Lee, G. M., & Seo, S. H. (2003). Effects of Information-Guided ICT Instruction and Manipulative Instruction on Fractions in Elementary Mathematics. Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.19.2.65
  17. Chung, Y. K., Lee, S. Y., Song, J. Y., & Woo, Y. K. (2017). Differential relations of students' perceived instructions to their motivation, classroom attitude, and academic achievement: The moderating role of self-efficacy. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 29(1), 211-235. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2017.29.1.211
  18. Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715-730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715
  19. Cury, F., Biddle, S., Famose, J-P., Goudas, M., Sarrazin, P., & Burand, M. (1996). Personal and situational factors influencing intrinsic interest of adolescent girls in school physical education: a structural equation modelling analysis. Educational Psychology, 16(3), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341960160307
  20. Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  21. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. New york: Houghton Mifflin.
  22. Do, Y. H., Choi, S. W., & Lee, S. M. (2011). Develop and apply items for mathematical modeling activity classes. Education Research Institute Kyung Nam University, Educational Theory, 21(0), 133-152.
  23. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In: W. Damon )series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Volume Ed.) Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. III, pp.1017-1095). New York: Wiley.
  24. Fraughton, T. B., Sansone, C., Butner, J., & Zachary, J. (2011). Interestand performance when learning online: Providing utility value information can be important for both novice and experienced students. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning(IJCBPL), 1(2),1-15. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2011040101
  25. Gillingham, G. G., & White, S. C. (1989). Effects of 'Seductive Details' on Macroprocessing and Microprocessing in Adults and Children. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2
  26. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative Content Analysis in Nursing Research: Concepts, Procedures and Mearsures to Achieve Trustwothiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
  27. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. Handbook of educational psychology. Berliner, David C., (Ed); Calfee, Robert C., (Ed); 15-46.
  28. Ha, M. H. (2017). A Study on Mathematics Teaching-Learning Methods with the 'Flipped Learning'. Major in Mathematics Education, Graduate School of Education, Pusan National University.
  29. Han, A. N. (2017). The Operation and Performance on Extracurricular Activities of D University. The Journal of Research in Education, 30(4), 111-138.
  30. Hannover, B. (1998). The development of self-concept and interests. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 105-125). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
  31. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement: Predicting continued interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
  32. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its Contribution as a Mental Resource for Learning. Review of Educational Research. 60(4), 549-571. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549
  33. Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness: a neglected variable in discourse processing. Congnitive Science, 10, 179-194.
  34. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The Four-phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  35. Hidi, S., Weiss, J., Berndorff, D., & Nolan, J. (1998). The role of gender, instruction and a cooperative learning technique in science education across formal and informal settings. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, &J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 215-227). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
  36. Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls' learning and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12, 447-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X
  37. Hwang, S. W., & Lew, K. H. (2019). Relationship Between Mathematics Anxiety, Interest and Mathematical Grades of High School Students According to Math Socialization. The Korea Society of Mathematical Education, Communications of Mathematical Education, 31(1), 21-34.
  38. Krapp, A. (2000). Interest and human development during adolescence: An educational-psychological approach. In J. Heckhausen, Motivational psychology of human development (p.109-128). Londong: Elsevier.
  39. Jeong, E. S. (2018). Exploring Teaching and Learning Activities for Improving Pre-service Teachers' Calssroom English. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(3), 389-414. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.3.389
  40. Jeong, H. H. (2016). An Importance-Performance Analysis of Conceptions of 'Good Instruction' in Higher Education: Based on the College of Education. The Journal of Korean Education, 43(1), 231-259.
  41. Jetton, T. L., & Alexander, P. A. (1997). Instructional Importance: What Teachers Value and What Students Learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(3), 290-308. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.32.3.4
  42. Jin, C. H., Kang, J. C., & Lee, S. S. (2014). Development of STAD-Based Elementary Mathematics Online Cooperative Learning Game Model. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 20(2), 217-230.
  43. Jung, A. S. (2017). Increasing Interest and Self-confidence in Math through Student-cented Class. The Journal of Future Education, 7(1), 89-109.
  44. Kang, I. A., & Choo, H. J. (2009). Re-Conceptualization of the Learner-Centered Education: The Status Quo of the In-Service Teachers. Korean Association Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 9(2), 1-34.
  45. Kang, K. H. (2010). The trend and the issues of domestic studies in relation to science teaching-learning methods. Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 22-32.
  46. Kim, K. B., Kim, J. K., & Lee, H. S. (2008). Curriculum Studies. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  47. Kim, M. R. (2017). A Study Teaching & Learning method based on the Constructivism. -Focused on 1st grade of middle school-. Mathematics Education Major, The Graduate School of Education, Chung-Ang University.
  48. Kim, M. J., Lee, J. H., & Kim, W. K. (2014). Development of teaching and learning materials by using GeoGebra and its application effects for high school mathematically gifted students. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 17(3), 359-384.
  49. Kim, S. H., & Lee, B. J. (2016). The Effects of Teaching Based on a Learning-communities Approach to Mathematics in Middle School. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 19(4), 417-439.
  50. Kim, S. I. (1996). The Role of Interest in Text Comprehension. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 8(2), 273-301.
  51. Kim, S. I., & Yoon, M. S. (2004). Designing a Learning Environment to Enhance Learner's Interest and Intrinsic Motivation to Learn. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 16(1), 39-66.
  52. Kim, S. M., & Kim, H. K. (2019). A research on mathematics teachers' perceptions of mathematics education. The Korea Society of Mathematical Education, the Mathematical Education, 58(1), 41-54.
  53. Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to self-determination theory. In E. Deci & R. Ryah (Eds.), The handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405-427). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  54. Kwon, K. H., & Park, J. S. (2002). An Analysis of Effects and Attitude-Interest of Small Group Cooperative Learning on Some Areas in Elementary School Mathematics. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 6, 41-58.
  55. Lee, H. J., Bong, C. W., Yoon, M. R., & Hong, S. H. (2018). An Application of Multilevel Structural Equation Model to Testing the Effect of Mathematics Self-efficacy and Educational Environment on Mathematical Interest-Comparison of results between Korea and Singapore. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 31(1), 353-386.
  56. Lee, J. J. (1997). A study on the practical methods of open teaching and learning in mathematics education. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 1, 1-16.
  57. Lee, J. Y., & Han, H. S. (2018). The Effects of Mathematical Problem Psing Activities on 10th Grade Students' Mathematics Achievement and Affective Characteristic of Mathematics. The Korea Society of Mathematical Education, Communications of Mathematical Education, 32(3), 385-406.
  58. Lee, N. R., & Koo, N. W. (2018). The Longitudinal Effects of the Degree of Participation in Non-subject Activities on the Cognitive, Social and Emotional Growth of Middle School Student. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 31(1), 181-200.
  59. Lee, R. (2019). The Meaning of the Extra-Curriculum-Activities in Secondary Schools in Korea: Based on Metaphor Analysis of Students in Teaching Class. Journal of Education and Culture, 25(2), 549-573. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2019.25.2.549
  60. Lee, S. J., & Choe, H. J. (2017). An analysis on the research trend of teaching and learning methods of informatics education in Korea. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 20(5), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2017.20.5.002
  61. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Mearsurement, 70, 647-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355699
  62. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Messersmith, E. E. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of situational interest. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 591-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02080.x
  63. Lipstein, R., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). "Putting things into words": 12-15-year-old students' interest for writing. In P. Boscolo & S. Hidi (Eds.), Motivation and writing: Research and school practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  64. Massoni, E. (2011). Positive Effects of Extra Curricular Activities on Students. ESSAI, 9, 1-4.
  65. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-Approach Goals: Good for What, for Whom, under What Circumstances, and at What Cost?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77
  66. Ministry of Education. (2015). Mathematics curriculum. Middle School Free Semester System Implementation Plan. Separate book, Teaching and learning methods presented in the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum(No.2015-74).
  67. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424-436. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.85.3.424
  68. Na,. K. Y., & Son, H. C. (2016). Effect of Reading in Mathematics Classroom on Mathematical Affective Characteristics of Middle School Students. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 19(1), 83-102.
  69. Nie, Y. Y., & Lau, S. (2010). Differential Relations of Constructivist and Didactic Instruction to Students' Cognition, Motivation and Achievement. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.04.002
  70. Oh, Y. S., & Jeon, Y. J. (2018). The Effect of Problem-Posing Activities on the Affective Domain of Mathematics. Journal of the Korea Contests Association, 18(2), 541-552.
  71. Palmer, D., Dixon, J., & Archer, J. (2017). Using situational interest to encance individual interest and science-related behavious. Research in sience education, 47, 731-753.
  72. Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass, Journal of Student Affairs in Africa, 2(2).
  73. Park, J. H., Kang, Y. G., & Han, S. Y. (2019). The Development and Application of the Instrument for Measuring Korean High School Students' Interests in Mathematics Learning. Journal of Korea Society Educational Studies in Mathematics, School Mathematics, 21(2), 319-346.
  74. Park, S. H., Kim, M. H., & Ju, M. K. (2010). A Study on Affective Characteristics Toward Mathematics. Korea Institue for Curriculum and Evaluation RRI 89-11.
  75. Park, Y. H. (2015). Increasing Learning Attitude and Interests for Students Through Various Quest Activities. The Journal of Future Education, 5(2), 27-24.
  76. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child(M. Cook, Trans). New York: Basic Books.
  77. Pressick-Kilborn, K., & Walker, R. (2002). The social construction of interest in a learning community. In D. McInerney & S. V. Etten (Eds.), Research on socio-cultural influences on motivation and learning. Information Age Publishing.
  78. Reninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the Conceptualization, Measurement, and Generation of Interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
  79. Reninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krap, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  80. Renninger, K. A., & Shumar, W. (2002). Community building with and for teachers: The Math Forum as a resource for teacher professional development. In K. A. Renninger&W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 60-95). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  81. Renninger, K. A., & Wozniak, R. H. (1985). Effect of interest on attention shift, recognition, and recall in young children. Developmental Psychology, 21, 624-632. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.21.4.624
  82. Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Rubenstein, R. (Eds). (2010). Mathematics curriculum: Issues, trends, and future directions. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  83. Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011a). Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 465-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9272-9
  84. Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011b). The role of teachers in facilitating situational interest in an active-learning classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.025
  85. Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 32, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.002
  86. Sadoski, M. (2001). Resolving the effects of concreteness on interest, comprehension, and learning important ideas from text. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 263-281. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016675822931
  87. Schank, R. C. (2007). Cave man educational technology. e-learning innovation and global cooperation in the digital era. Paper presented at the meeting of e-Learning Global Leaders Conference(pp.41-53), Seoul.
  88. Schiefele, U. (1991). interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 29-323. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5
  89. Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_4
  90. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). The effect of reader purpose on interest and recall. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969409547834
  91. Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interesting the classroom. Educational psychology review, 13(3), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016619705184
  92. Shin, I. S., & Park, K. M. (2012). An analysis of changing interests in mathematics and strategic Thinking reflected in small group drawing activities using graphs and inequations: With Grafeq software. Journal of Korean Society Mathematics Education Series E, Communications of Mathematical Education, 26(2), 177-203
  93. Sloboda, J. A. (1990). Musical excellence-How does it develop? In M. Howe (Ed.), Encouraging the development of exceptional skills and talents (pp. 165-178). Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
  94. Sloboda, J. A., & Davidson, J. W. (1995). The young performing musician. In I. Deliege & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), The origins and development of musical competence (pp. 171-190). London: Oxford University Press.
  95. So, Y. H. (2010). Does Peer Tutoring Enhance Task Interests in Mathematics? -The Effects of Grouping Format of Peer Tutoring, Peer Support, and Competition-. The Journal of Vocational Education Research. 29(4), 55-71.
  96. Sohn, Y., & Kim, S. I. (2005). The Effect of Grouping Format of Peer Tutoring on Achievement and Interest. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(3), 595-613.
  97. Song, C. J. (2014). A Study on the Teaching and Learning Activities, Student-teacher Communication, and Course Satisfaction. Education Research Institute, Asian Journal of Education, 15(2), 171-200.
  98. Wisniewska, D. (2013). Interest and interest-enhancing strategies of adolescent EFL learners. ELT Journal, 67(2), 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs079
  99. Woo, Y. K. (2012). The Current State and Future Direction of Interest Research in Academic Setting. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 26(4), 1179-1199.
  100. Woo, Y. K. (2014). Relationships among Utility Value, Persistence, and Achievement Depending on the Self-efficacy: The Mediating Role of Situational Interest. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 28(3), 405-420.
  101. Yang, M. H. (2001). Qualitative Research as a Legitimate Method for Phenomenon Exploration in Physical Education. University of Jeju, Jounal of Exercise and Sport Science, 7, 145-156.
  102. Yi, H. S., & Lee, C. M. (2015). Analysis of Longitudinal Change of Interest and Self-Confidence in Mathematics Among Countries with High Performance on TIMSS Mathematics. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 28(2), 313-337.
  103. Yu, H. S., Kim, E. Y., Seo, J. M., Choi, J. Y., Byun, H. J., Lee, G. J., Choi, B. K., Heo, E., & Youn, S. H. (2015). Strategic Planning for the Advancement of the Teaching-Learning Quality in Higher Education(III). Korea Institute for Educational Development RR 2015-10.