Journal of Information Management (정보관리연구)

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Main Issue Analysis of the KESLI Consortium

KESLI 컨소시엄의 주요 이슈 분석에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Jeong-Hwan (Dept. of Library and Information Science, Chungnam National Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Eung-Bong (Dept. of Library and Information Science, Chungnam National Univ.)
  • Published : 2009.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A core point of the KESLI consortium raises the participation score of the joining institute and improves the cohesive force and reliability to cope with prices continued rising of publishers, commonly and gives the actual profit to the joining institute by providing the base able to utilize the academic information with dispersion owning the national institutes. In this study the whole opinion of the consortium joining institute is collected in the future in order to deduce the reasonable and advantageous consortium model in which the consortium joining institute can be commonly applied. The facing task of the KESLI consortium is analyzed through a literature research, a questionnaire survey, a panel discussion and we try to present.

KESLI 컨소시엄의 핵심 포인트는 참가기관의 참여도를 높여 응집력과 신뢰성을 증진시킴으로써 출판사의 지속적인 가격인상에 공동으로 대처하고, 국내 각급 기관에 분산 소장된 학술정보를 공동으로 활용할 수 있는 기반을 제공함으로써 참가기관에 실익을 주는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 향후 컨소시엄 참가기관이 공통적으로 적용받을 수 있는 합리적이고 발전적인 컨소시엄 운영모델을 마련하기 위한 전제로써 문헌연구, 설문지 조사와 패널토론을 통해 컨소시엄 참가기관의 전체의견을 수렴하여 KESLI 컨소시엄의 당면과제를 도출하여 제시하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김성진, 정은경, 한민혜. 2008. 전자저널 컨소시엄을 둘러싼 학술커뮤니케이션의 쟁점과 대응 동향. 정보관리연구, 39(1): 27-52.
  2. 신은자. 2001. 전자저널의 가격모형과 가격책정현황에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 35(2): 151-170.
  3. 신은자. 2007. 학술지 빅딜판매의 문제점 및 개선 방안. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(1): 373- 389. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.1.373
  4. 이소연 등. 2007. KESLI 효율성 분석을 통한 미래형 컨소시엄 운영모형 개발연구. 대전: 한국과학기술정보연구원.
  5. 전혜영, 박수희. 2008. 전자저널 컨소시엄의 이해관계자 요구 분석 연구. 정보관리연구, 39(1): 53-82. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.1.053
  6. 한혜영, 조현양. 2003. 해외학술 전자정보의 국가적 컨소시엄 정책 개발 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 37(3): 97-120.
  7. 황옥경. 2004. 전자저널 라이선스 계약모델에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 38(1): 199-228. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2004.38.1.199
  8. KESLI. 2009. KESLI 전자정보 포럼 패널토론. 2009년 4월 16일. [대명리조트 부안: 대명콘도].
  9. ARL. 2008. ARL Statistics 2006-07. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. [cited 2009. 08. 10]. .
  10. ARL's Principles for Licensing Electronic Resources. [cited 2009. 08. 10]. .
  11. Consortium Purchasing Directory. 2009. Edition IV. Frontline Global Marketing Services.
  12. Chandra Prabha. 2007. “Shifting from Print to Electronic Journals in ARL University Libraries.” Serials Review, 33(1): 4-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2006.12.001
  13. CRKN Evaluation Committee. 2004. Impact of the Canadian National Site Licensing Project: a report to partners and stakeholders. [cited 2009. 08. 10]. .
  14. Gargiulo, P. 2003. “Electronic journals and users: the CIBER experience in Italy.” The Serials, 16(3): 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1629/16293
  15. Hawker, A. C. and C. K. Wagner. 1996. “Periodical Ownership versus Full -text Online Access: a Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(2): 105-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(96)90176-7
  16. Hockx-Yu, H. 2006. “Digital Preservation in the context of institutional repositories.” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 40(3): 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330330610681312
  17. Kurata, K., M. et al. 2007. “Electronic Journals and their unbundled functions in scholarly communication: Views and utilization by scientific, technological and medical researchers in Japan.” Information Processing and Management, 43: 1402- 1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.01.006
  18. Nicholas, D., P. Huntington, H. R. Jamali and C. Tenopir. 2006. “What deep log analysis tells us about the impact of big deals: case study OhioLINK.” Journal of Documentation, 62(4): 482-508. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610673864
  19. Rabiee. Fatemeh. 2004. “Focus-group interview and data analysis.” Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63: 655-660. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2004399
  20. Research Information Network(RIN). 2006. “UK Scholarly Journals: 2006 Baseline Report; An Evidence-based Analysis of Data Concerning Scholarly Journal Publishing.”
  21. Tattersall, Marion. 2003. “Big deals: reflections on electronic journal acquisition 1996-2003,” Serials, 16(2): 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1629/16201

Cited by

  1. Seeking Alternative Models and Research Trends for Big Deals in the Electronic Journal Consortium vol.42, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.1.085
  2. A Study for the Efficiency Analysis on Big Deals of Electronic Journal vol.47, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.4.187