DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Evaluation Indices for Redundant Farmlands Rehabilitation-Policy Directions

유휴농지의 활용방향 설정을 위한 평가지표 개발

  • 배승종 (서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 윤성수 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학) ;
  • 한이철 (서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 윤홍일 (한국농어촌공사)
  • Received : 2010.08.18
  • Accepted : 2010.09.20
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop evaluation indices which can be applied to analyze rational rehabilitation-policy directions of redundant farmlands. To achieve this objective, the main tasks of this research are 1) categorizing the redundant farmlands rehabilitation types 2) developing the evaluation indices of redundant farmlands rehabilitation 3) determining the weights of each index. The redundant farmlands rehabilitation types were classified into agricultural rehabilitation type, non-agricultural rehabilitation type and hybrid type which are called by agricultural income model, rural environment improvement model and hybrid model as development project name, respectively. The 5 parts and 21 indices for evaluation of redundant farmlands rehabilitation directions were extracted by case studies and experts brainstorming. The weights of each index were determined by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The developed evaluation indices were applied to study areas located on Yanghwa district of Gongju-city and Aewol district of Jeju-city. From the results of this study, it was ascertained that the evaluation indices developed in this study would help the decision-makers in the planning process of redundant farmlands rehabilitation directions.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, S. J., and H. W. Chung, 2007. Development of a rural amenity values assessment model by Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 49(5): 33-44 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2007.49.5.033
  2. Barry Smith, Laurie Ludlow, Tom Johnston, and Mark Flaherty, 1987. Identifying Important Agricultural Lands: A Critique, Canadian Geographer 31(4): 356-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1987.tb01663.x
  3. Chae, M. O., 2001. A review on the agricultural land suitability assessment of USA and its policy implication. Human Settlements Research 32: 127-141 (in Korean).
  4. Chae, M. O., and Y. J. Oh, 2003. A study on land suitability assessment factors and their weights. Journal of the Korean geographical society 38(5): 725-740 (in Korean).
  5. Chae, M. O., and Y. J. Oh, 2004. A study on the land suitability assessment methods for effective land management. Journal of the Korean Planners Association 39(1): 45-58 (in Korean).
  6. Chae, M. O., H. S. Song, M. Y. Park, and N. K. Lee, 2006. A study on the improvement of the appropriateness and modification of type II of land suitability assessment system. Journal of the Korean Planners Association 41(7): 21-36 (in Korean).
  7. Cho, G. T., 2005, Analytic Network Process, Donghyun press
  8. Choi, H. J, D. S. Ji, S. Choi, and S. J. Kim, 2005. Institutional improvements for the utilization and management of idle agricultural land, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements (in Korean).
  9. Choi, M. S., and H. K. Yuh, 2006. A study on the improvement of grading methods in land suitability assesment. Journal of the Korean Planners Association 41(5): 21-32 (in Korean).
  10. Hwang, H. C., and S. M. Choi, 1997. Development of land suitability classification system for rational agricultural land use planning. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 3(2): 102-111 (in Korean).
  11. Kim, J. K, and S. E. Ahn, 2005. Policy suggestions to encourage the conversion of marginal farmland to forestland. Human Settlements Research 46: 3-19 (in Korean).
  12. Kim, S. S., and J. N. Heo, 2007a. An analysis on the circulation of agricultural land and suggestions for political tasks, Korea Rural Economic Institute (in Korean).
  13. Kim, S. S., E. S. Hwang, and J. N. Heo, 2007b. Revitalization of farmland banking enterprises and management measures for abandoned farmland, Korea Rural Economic Institute (in Korean).
  14. KRC, 2008. Investigation Report of Current Condition of abandoned farmlands. Uiwang, Gyeonggi: Korea Rural Corporation (in Korean).
  15. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), 2008a. The implementation manual of whole survey of abandoned farmlands (in Japanese).
  16. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), 2008b. The whole survey method of abandoned farmlands (in Japanese).
  17. Park, S. D., and S. S. Kim, 2005. Current Condition of abandoned or idle farm land and policy direction, Korea Rural Economic Institute (in Korean).
  18. Rhee, S. Y., H. K. Kang, and S. J. Lee, 2009. The abandoned farmlands status and management in rural area. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 15 (1): 15-29 (in Korean).
  19. Satty, Thomas L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGRAWHill International Book Company.

Cited by

  1. Development of Policies and Business Models of Utilizing Idle Farmlands vol.20, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.1.091
  2. Establishing Evaluation Indicator for Agricultural Utilization of Idle Farmlands and Field Application vol.20, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.2.127