DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Instruction Librarians' Perceptions of the Customized Bibliographic Instructions in Academic Libraries

맞춤형 이용자교육에 관한 대학도서관 사서들의 인식 조사

  • 정미정 (명지대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 권나현 (명지대학교 인문대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2014.11.20
  • Accepted : 2014.12.12
  • Published : 2014.12.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the librarians' perceptions of the customized bibliographic instructions (CBI) at four-year academic libraries in Korea. The study also examined instruction librarians' perceptions of the obstacles and the factors associated with the effective adoption and delivery of the CBI. This study conducted both a survey research method and an in depth-interview. The findings of the study revealed the librarians' perception of the obstacles and facilitators in adopting and operating the CBI, which suggests useful strategies to apply in delivering the CBI in academic libraries.

본 연구의 목적은 맞춤형 이용자교육을 시행하고 있는 국내 대학도서관의 맞춤형 이용자교육담당 사서들의 인식을 조사하는 것이다. 맞춤형 이용자교육을 제공해 본 경험이 있는 8명의 사서를 대상으로 일차적으로 심층면담하고, 그들의 응답과 문헌조사를 토대로 설문지를 개발하여 해당 교육을 제공해 본 전국 94개 대학도서관의 사서 94명을 대상으로 설문조사하였다. 연구결과, 응답자 대부분이 맞춤형 이용자교육에 대해 긍정적으로 인식하는 가운데, 교육 운영에서 교수진과의 협력을 가장 중요하다고 여기는 것으로 나타났다. 또 맞춤형 교육사서에게 필요한 것으로 석사학위나 주제지식보다 교육에 대한 의지나 봉사정신 등 태도적 측면을 더 중요한 것으로 인식하고 있었으며, 담당인력 부족을 교육 운영의 가장 큰 어려움으로 파악하고 있었다. 본 연구결과는 현장에서 맞춤형 이용자교육을 확대, 제공하는데 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김나원 (2008). 이용자 행태 및 요구 분석을 통한 의학도서관 이용교육 프로그램 개발 연구. 석사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과.(Kim, Na Won (2008). A study on the development of user instruction programs in medical libraries through analyzing user behaviors and needs. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.)
  2. 남재연 (2012). 맞춤형 교육을 중심으로 한 도서관서비스 개발 및 활용. KERIS 발표자료.(Nam, Jae yeon (2012). Development and application of the library's service based on customized bibliographic instructions. Paper presented at Korea Education & Research Information Service.)
  3. 박준식 (2000). 정보환경의 변화와 사서의 역할변용. 한국도서관정보학회지, 31(2), 21-40.(Park, Junsik (2000). Changing roles of the librarians under the new information environment. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 31(2), 21-40.)
  4. 성도경, 이환범, 이수창, 장철영, 최인규 (2011). 알기쉬운 통계기법의 활용: 사회현상 조사분석 및 연구 논문 작성을 위한 SPSS. 대구: 대명.(Sung, Dogyeong, Lee, Hwanbeom, Lee, Suchang, Jang, Cheolyeong, & Choe, Ingyu (2011). The use of statistical techniques easy to understand social phenomena for research and writing research papers SPSS. Daegu: DaeMyeong.)
  5. 안인자 (2005). 사서직 업무변화에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 16(1), 233-246.(Ahn, In-Ja (2005). A study of evolution of the librarian job. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 16(1), 233-246.)
  6. 이시영 (2010). 대학도서관 사서의 위기와 대처. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 41(3), 47-67.(Lee, Si-Young (2010). Crisis and response of librarians at university libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(3), 47-67.) https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.3.201009.47
  7. 정달수 (2005). 유비쿼터스 도서관과 사서의 역할 변화에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 전남대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과.(Jung, Dalsu (2005). A study on the ubiquitous library and librarian's role change in the environment of ubiquitous library. Unpublished master's thesis, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.)
  8. 정미정 (2014). 대학도서관 이용자 맞춤형 교육의 효과적 도입과 운영 방안 연구. 석사학위논문, 명지대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과.(Jung, Mijung (2014). Strategies for the effective adoption and delivery of customized bibliographic instructions in academic libraries. Unpublished master's thesis, Myongji University, Seoul, Korea.)
  9. 정미정, 권나현 (2014). 대학도서관 맞춤형 이용자교육의 운영 현황 분석 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(2), 99-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.2.099(Jung, Mijung, & Kwon, Nahyun (2014). Current practices of the customized bibliographic instructions in academic libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(2), 99-119.)
  10. 최상희 (2007). 사서직 구인광고에서 나타난 교육사서 직무와 역량분석 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(3), 201-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.3.201(Choi, Sang-Hee (2007). An analysis on the roles, responsibilities, and job qualifications of instruction librarians in librarian job ads. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(3), 201-215.)
  11. 최은주, 박남진 (2005). 대학생의 정보활용능력에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구: 정규 교과목 정보이용 교육 수강생을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 22(4), 153-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.4.153(Choi, Eun-Ju, & Park, Nam-Jin (2005). A study on influential factors on information literacy of undergraduate students. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 22(4), 153-172.)
  12. 한국교육학술정보원 (2012). 2012 대학도서관 통계분석 자료집. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원.(Korea Education & Research Information Service (2012). 2012 A statistical analysis in academic libraries. Seoul: Korea Education & Research Information Service.)
  13. 한국도서관협회 (2010). 문헌정보학 용어사전. 서울: 한국도서관협회.(Korean Library Association (2010). Library and information science glossary. Seoul: Korean Library Association.)
  14. American Library Association (2009). ALA's core competences of librarianship. Final version. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/careers/corecomp/corecompetences/finalcorecompstat09.pdf
  15. Attebury, R., Sprague, N., & Young, N. J. (2009). A decade of personalized research assistance. Reference Services Review, 37(2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320910957233
  16. Bell, S. P., & Shank, J. (2004). The blended librarian: A blueprint for redefining the teaching and learning role of academic librarians. College & Research Libraries News, 64, 373-376.
  17. Bennett, S. (2009). Libraries and learning: A history of paradigm change. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.0.0049
  18. Canadian Association of Research Libraries (2010). Core competencies for 21st century CARL librarians. Retrieved from http://carl-abrc.ca/uploads/pdfs/core_comp_profile-e.pdf
  19. Crews, K. D. (1997). The academic library in the information Age: Changing roles. Seal Beach, CA: Consortium for Educational Technology for University Systems.
  20. Dewey, B. I. (2004). The embedded librarian: Strategic campus collaborations. Resource Sharing & Information Networks, 17(1-2), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1300/J121v17n01_02
  21. Firooznia, F., & Andreadis, D. K. (2006). Information literacy in introductory biology. Journal of College Science Teaching, May-June 2006, 23-27.
  22. Fleming, H. (1990). User education in academic libraries. London: Library Association Publish.
  23. Freeman, E., & Lynd-Balta, E. (2010). Developing information literacy skills early in an undergraduate curriculum. College Teaching, 58, 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550903521272
  24. Heider, K. L. (2010). Ten tips for implementing a successful embedded librarian program. Public Services Quarterly, 6(2-3), 110-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2010.498765
  25. Ivey, R. (2003). Information literacy: How do librarians and academics work in partnership to deliver effective learning programs?. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 34(2), 100-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2003.10755225
  26. Kappus, T., Jenks, K., & Pauw, A. (2011). Can you meet with me on friday?: Personalized library instruction by appointment. Alki, 27(3), 8.
  27. Lippincott, J. (2000). Librarians and cross-sector teamwork. ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions for ARL, CNI, and SPARC, 208/209(February/April), 22-23.
  28. Mitchell, M. S., Comer, C. H., Starkey, J. M., & Francis, E. A. (2011). Paradigm shift in reference services at the Oberlin College Library: A case study. Journal of Library Administration, 51(4), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.556959
  29. Roberts, J. C., & Bhatt, J. (2007). Innovative approaches to information literacy instruction for engineering undergraduates at Drexel University. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701276171
  30. Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). Grading and differentiation: Paradox or good practice?. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 262-269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_11
  31. Young, H.(Ed.). (1986). The ALA glossary of library and information science. Chicago: American Library Association.