Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Priority Analysis on Influential Factors for Invigorating Project Management Office (PMO) in Public Sectors based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

계층분석과정을 이용한 공공분야 PMO 제도 활성화요인 우선순위 분석

  • Back, Hyungchung (Department of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kang, Pilsung (Department of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 백형충 (서울과학기술대학교 글로벌융합산업공학과) ;
  • 강필성 (서울과학기술대학교 글로벌융합산업공학과)
  • Received : 2014.08.11
  • Accepted : 2014.10.13
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study identifies influential factors for invigorating the public management office (PMO) system for system integration (SI) projects in public sectors and analyzes the priority of each factor from the point of different stakeholders, i.e., owners, SI company, and PMO. Based on the literature review, four first-level influential factors are identified: legal system maintenance, owner's capability, SI company's capability, and PMO's capability. Among them, the PMO's capability is determined as the most critical factor by all the stakeholders. Among the second-level influential factors, the capabilities of professional engineers and project managers are considered as important among the PMO's capability, whereas the reasonable consulting fee is considered as the most critical factor among the legal system maintenance. With respect to each stakeholder, project management capability is considered as the most important factor for owners, while the reasonable consulting fee is considered as the most important factor for PMO.

Keywords

References

  1. Artto, K., Kulvik, I., Poskela, J., and Turkulainen, V., The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 2011, Vol. 29, No. 4, p 408-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.01.008
  2. Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., and Thuillier, D., A new framework for understanding organisational project management through the PMO. International Journal of Project Management, 2007, Vol. 25, No. 4, p 328-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.004
  3. Aubry, M., Richer, M.-C., and Lavoie-Tremblay, M., Governance performance in complex environment : The case of a major transformation in a university hospital. International Journal of Project Management, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.008.
  4. Bates, W.S., Improving project management : Better project management begins with a project management office. IIE Solutions, 1998, Vol. 30, No. 10, p 42-43.
  5. Bayazit, O., Use of analytic network process in vender selection decisions. Benchmarking : An International Journal, 2006, Vol. 13, No. 5, p 566-579. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770610690410
  6. Bhang, M.J., Study on enhancement of efficiency of project management organizations of public institutions : Centering on Korea rail network authority. Proceedings of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2008.
  7. Cha, H.J., Kim, J.H., and Kim, W.J., Study on evaluating risk factors under software partitioning order. Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 2010, Vol. 9, No. 2, p 77-92.
  8. Craford, L., Developing organizational project management capability : Theory and practice. Project Management Journal, 2006, Vol. 37, No. 7, p 74-97.
  9. Dai, C.X. and Wells, W.G., An exploration of project management office features and the relationship to project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 2004, Vol. 22, No. 7, p 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.001
  10. Desouza, K.C. and Evaristo, J.R., Project management offices : A case of knowledge-based archetypes. International Journal of Information Management, 2006, Vol. 26, No. 5, p 414-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.07.002
  11. Feeny, D.F. and Willcocks, L.P., Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Review, 1998, Vol. 39, No. 3, p 9-20.
  12. Goles, T., Vendor capabilities and outsourcing success: A resource-based view, 2003 Vol. 45, No. 2, p 199-206.
  13. Gu, S.H. and Lee, J.H., Methodological implications of AHP for universal design evaluation method. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 2013, Vol. 12, No. 7, p 138-146.
  14. Han, H.S., Lee, J.N., and Seo, Y.W., Analyzing the impact of a firm's capability on outsourcing success : A process perspective. Information and Management, 2008, Vol. 45, No. 1, p 31-42.
  15. Hill, G.M., Evolving the project management office : A competency continuum. Information Systems Management, 2004, Vol. 21, No. 4, p 45-51.
  16. Hurt, M. and Thomas, J.L., Building value through sustainable project management offices. Project Management Journal, 2009, Vol. 40, No. 1, p 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20095
  17. Jeong, J.W. and Joo, H.J., A study on the introduction of PMO in Incheon. Incheon Development Institute 2012.
  18. Kang, J.H., Kim, D.S., Kim, H.S., and Ahn, Y.S., A explorative study of the characteristics of superviors on the supervising quality of SI projects : Focusing on SI projects for central administration organizations. Proceedings of the Korean IT Service Society, 2005.
  19. Kim, J.G. and Yoon, O.S., A study on PMO functions that affect project performance enhancement. Proceedings of the Korea Society of Management Information Systems, 2010.
  20. Kim, S.B., Kim, S.H., and Kim, W.J., A comparative study on critical competence importance between top and executing ISA. Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 2013, Vol. 11, No. 11, p 119-131.
  21. Kim, S.Y., A study on the PMO integrated performance management model for improving information system development projects, [dissertation]. [Seoul, Korea] : Sogang University, 2008.
  22. Korea Labor Institute, A study on the establishment of win-win labor-management relationship for conglomerate and small and medium-sized companies. Ministry of Employment and Labor, Republic of Korea, 2009.
  23. Kyung, T.W. and Kim, S.G., A study on the establishment of priority for IT project management using AHP. Information Systems Review, 2007, Vol. 9, No. 3, p 157-181.
  24. Kyung, T.W. and Kim, S.G., A study on the priority analysis of information systems audit evaluation factors using fuzzy-AHP method. Information Systems Review, 2008, Vol. 10, No. 3, p 155-183.
  25. Lee, C.C., Park, J.Y., and Choi, J.H., The effect of the project managersʼ IT competency and managerial competency on the success of SI projects. The Journal of Information Systems, 2012, Vol. 21, No. 4, p 31-54. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2012.21.4.31
  26. Lee, J.S., An empirical study on the influences and effects of IT PMO governance [dissertation]. [Seoul, Korea] : Chungang University, 2011.
  27. Lee, S.H., Shim, G.B., Choi, J.H., and Shim, B.S., A study on ICT project separated order plan and establishment of PMO system. Korean Institute of Procurement, 2011.
  28. Liu, L. and Yetton, P., The contingent effects on project performance of conducting project reviews and deploying project management offices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2007, Vol. 54, No. 4, p 789- 799. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.906852
  29. Ministry of Security and Public Administration. Electronic government act enforcement ordinance amendment. Presidential Decree No. 24654, Republic of Korea, 2013.
  30. Ministry of Security and Public Administration. Regulations on e-government project management commitment. Ministry of Security and Public Administration Announcement, No. 2013-32, Republic of Korea, 2013.
  31. Ministry of Security and Public Administration. Public hearing for introduction of PMO in public sectors. Republic of Korea, 2013.
  32. Qing-lan, C. and Chang-wei, M., Project management mechanism mediates the influence of business strategy on corporate performance. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM'08), 2008.
  33. Saaty, T.L., How to make a decision : The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, Vol. 48, No. 1, p 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  34. Singh, R., Keil, M., and Kasi, V., Identifying and overcoming the challenges of implementing a project management office. European Journal of Information Systems, 2009, Vol. 18, No. 5, p 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.29
  35. Suh, C.J., Lee, J.E., and Kim, S.C., A competency model for management consulting : Comparison of the consultant' s competency specialized in small business and large business. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 2011, Vol. 30, No. 2, p 135-155.
  36. Tam, M.C.Y. and Tummala, V.M.R., An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 2, p 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00039-6

Cited by

  1. PMO의 역량과 조직공정성이 IT 프로젝트 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 vol.21, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2016.21.3.129
  2. AHP 기법을 활용한 소프트웨어 제안평가요인의 상대적 중요도에 관한 연구 : 발주자와 수주자 비교를 중심으로 vol.16, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9716/kits.2017.16.1.041
  3. 소프트웨어 운영 대가산정 방식에 대한 실증적 연구 vol.18, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9716/kits.2019.18.4.067