DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Supply Adequacy of Park Service in Suwon-si by Urban Park Catchment Area Analysis

도시공원 이용권 분석을 통한 수원시 공원서비스의 적정성 평가

  • Kim, Hyun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Yea Sung (Dept. of Urban Planning and Design Research, The Seoul Institute) ;
  • Lee, Da-Som (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Jee-Yeop (Dept. of Architecture, Ajou University)
  • 김현 (단국대학교 녹지조경학과) ;
  • 김예성 (서울연구원) ;
  • 이다솜 (단국대학교 대학원 녹지조경학과) ;
  • 김지엽 (아주대학교 건축학과)
  • Received : 2015.03.13
  • Accepted : 2015.04.23
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

In the city, the urban park contributes to the quality of citizen life in many ways, and the importance of the urban park as an urban planning facility is growing each day. In this study, evaluation of park service supply adequacy in Suwon-si, the difference in analysis methods, and the type of land use at urban park catchment area analysis were analyzed. As a result, there were remarkable differences between the two analysis methods. In Suwon-si, the catchment area by network analysis was only about 41% of catchment area by buffer analysis. However, when basic local authorities establish planning of parks and green areas, they use buffer analysis to calculate the park service area. It means that such calculations of urban park service areas may be wider than actually used. Also, because there were differences between urban park catchment areas by land use types, guidelines of planning parks and green areas will be adjusted. Although quantitative expansion of the park area is also important for the realization of green welfare, it is necessary to consider city characteristics such as the population size, population density, land use types, and so on.

도시에서 도시공원은 여러 측면에서 도시민의 삶의 질 향상에 기여하고 있으며, 도시계획 시설로서 도시공원의 중요성은 점점 높아지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 수원시를 대상으로 도시지역에서 공원서비스의 적정성을 판단하기 위해 공원 이용권 분석 시 분석기법과 토지이용 유형에 따른 차이를 고찰하고 다음과 같은 결론을 도출하였다. 도시공원 이용권율은 버퍼분석과 네트워크 분석 등 분석기법에 따라 이용권율이 현저한 차이를 보이고 있어, 수원시의 경우 네트워크 분석으로 산출한 이용권율은 버퍼분석으로 산출한 이용권율의 41%에 그치고 있었다. 그러나 현재 기초자치단체에서 공원녹지 기본계획 수립 시 버퍼분석을 활용하여 공원 서비스율을 산정하고 있어, 현재 공급되는 공원녹지 면적이 실제 이용자에게 서비스되는 공원녹지 면적보다 넓게 나타날 수 있다는 점이 고찰되었다. 또한 전체 도시면적과 주거 상업면적 등 토지이용에 유형에 따라서 도시공원 이용권의 차이도 도출되어 향후 공원녹지기본계획 수립 지침작성에 있어 이들에 대한 보완이 요구된다. '녹색복지'의 실현을 위해서는 공원면적의 양적 확충도 중요하지만 인구규모, 인구밀도, 토지이용 유형 등 도시특성에 대한 고려가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn. D. M., H. S. Choi, I. H. Kim and H. J. Cho(1991) A study on the method of measuring accessibility to urban open spaces. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40('91.1): 17-28.
  2. Baek. J. H.(1984) A review on the methodologies for optimum location - Centered on the rectilinear and euclidean distance method. Sogang University, Institute of Market Economy 8: 93-125.
  3. Chae, J. H., K. J. Zoh, S. J. Kim, Y. K. Hoh and J. Y. Hwang(2014) A study on operational systems & planning contents of parks & green space plan - Focused on London, New York, Berlin, Sydney, Seoul -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(2): 91-102. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.2.091
  4. Hoggett, P.(2001) Democracy, social relations and ecowelfare. Social Policy & Administration 35(5): 608-626. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00256
  5. Hur, M. S. and Y. K. Chin(1996). GIS-oriented measurement indicces of accessibility of the neighborhood park in Seoul. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 24(3): 42-56.
  6. Im, S. B. and Y. J. Huh(1995) A study on the model of measuring visual accessibility to urban green spaces. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 23(3): 1-14.
  7. Kim, Y. S., H. Kim and J. S. Ko(2014) Analysis on the use characteristics of citizen based on urban green spaces type: Focuses on Suwon-city. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(5): 31-40. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.5.031
  8. Kwon, S. J. and Y. I. Kim(1993) Gravity model for the catchments between parks. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 50('93.7): 1-7.
  9. NSW(2010) "Recreation and Open Space Planning Guidelines for Local Government", New South Wales Government
  10. Oh, K. S. and Y. W. Jung(1999) The usefulness of the GIS - Fuzzy set approach for evaluation the urban residential environment. Journal of Korea Planners Association 34(4): 71-83.
  11. Park, C. I.(2010) A study on expansion of urban park and green belt based on resident's attitude of park and green belt. Journal of Korea Institute of Forest Recreation Welfare 14(3): 29-37.
  12. SDUDE(2006) "Landschafts programmeinschliesslich Artenschutzprogramm 1994". Senate Department for Urban Development and the Environment.
  13. Shin, Y. S and J. I. Shim(1998) Traffic impact assessment analysis. Transport Institute.
  14. Son, S. W. and T. M. Ahn(2013) Sensitivity analysis on the population within and outside of the urban park service area: Focused on Daegu Metropolitan city neighborhood parks and resident registration number data. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 41(5): 9-18. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2013.41.5.009
  15. Son. S. W.(2013) (A)Study on the Urban Park Service Areas &Population: Focused on Daegu Metropolitan City Neighborhood Parks and Residents Registration Number Data. Master Degree Thesis, Seoul National University. Seoul. Korea.
  16. Sung, H. C. and J. Y. Shin(2005) Strategies to improve parks' accessibility in city - Focus on Gyeonggi-do region -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 33(2): 83-91.
  17. Yoon, H. M. and H. Y. Kim(2013) Analysis on index of park and green area per person based on its service area - The case of Dongdaemungu, Seoul - 48(3): 329-341.