Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study of Preservice Secondary Science Teachers' Demonstration of STEAM Lessons

중등 예비과학교사의 STEAM 수업 시연에 대한 사례 연구

  • Received : 2015.07.14
  • Accepted : 2015.08.10
  • Published : 2015.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this case study, we analyzed the processes of STEAM lessons conducted by preservice secondary science teachers. Three preservice science teachers at a college of education in Seoul participated in this study. After the workshop for STEAM education, they planned and practiced STEAM lessons. All of the teaching-learning materials were collected before lessons, and their lessons were observed and videotaped. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted before and after their lessons. The processes of STEAM lessons were analyzed while focusing on PCK and PDC. Their difficulties, needs, and views on STEAM education were also studied. It was found that they have taken much efforts to reflect the objectives and characteristics of STEAM education, and prepared teaching-learning materials by searching on the internet and arranging creative contents. Their great difficulty was to determine topics for STEAM lessons. While one preservice teacher satisfied with her lesson perceived STEAM education positively, the others perceived that it would be very difficult to practice STEAM lessons in school. For their STEAM lessons to be successful, the workshop needs to include some specific information on grades, proper topics for each grade, ways of making materials, and tips for effective STEAM lessons. In addition, it will be effective if the workshop is carried out after their study on constructivist learning theory and if they experience successful STEAM lessons.

이 연구에서는 중등 예비과학교사의 STEAM 수업 시연 과정에서 나타나는 특징을 사례 연구를 통해 분석하였다. 서울 소재 사범대학의 예비과학교사 3명이 연구에 참여하였고, 이들은 STEAM 교육에 대한 워크숍을 받은 후 STEAM 수업을 계획하고 실행하였다. 수업 실행전에 예비교사들이 제작한 모든 교수-학습 자료를 수집하였고, 수업을 관찰하면서 모든 수업 장면을 녹화하였으며, 수업 전후에 반구조화된 면담을 실시하고 녹음하였다. 예비교사의 STEAM 수업 시연 과정에서 나타나는 특징은 PCK와 PDC의 측면에서 중점적으로 분석하였고, 어려움과 교육요구, STEAM 교육에 대한 견해도 조사하였다. 연구결과, 예비교사들은 STEAM 교육의 목표와 특징을 수업에 충분히 반영하려고 노력하였고, 인터넷으로 검색되는 교수-학습 자료나 창의적인 내용을 배치하여 수업 자료를 구성하는 것으로 나타났다. 예비교사들이 가장 어렵다고 느낀 것은 STEAM 수업의 주제를 선정하는 것이었다. 또한 자신의 수업에 만족한 1명의 예비교사는 STEAM 교육에 대해 긍정적 생각을 갖고 있는 반면, 나머지 2명의 예비교사는 학교현장에서 STEAM 수업이 적용되기 어려울 것이라는 생각을 갖고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 학교 현장에서 STEAM 수업이 성공적으로 실행되기 위해서는, 예비교사를 위한 워크숍에서 수업을 효과적으로 진행할 수 있는 대상 학년과 그에 맞는 주제, 수업 자료 제작 방법, 수업 실행 시 주의할 점 등에 대한 구체적 정보를 안내할 필요가 있다. 또한 워크숍은 예비교사가 구성주의 학습 이론을 접한 후에 진행하고, 워크숍에서 예비교사가 성공적인 STEAM 수업을 경험하도록 하는 것이 효과적일 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, J., Yun, B., & Kim, J. (2013). The effects of science lesson applying STEAM education on science learning motivation and science academic achievement of elementary school students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(4), 557-566.
  2. Brown, M. (2002). Teaching by design: Understanding the intersection between teacher practice and the design of curricular innovations. (Doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University.
  3. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  4. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  5. Geum, Y., & Bae, S. (2012). The recognition and needs of elementary school teachers about STEAM education. Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Education, 37(2), 57-75.
  6. Han, J., Yoon, J., & Noh, T. (2008). The usefulness of coteaching as preservice teachers education strategy. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 25(1), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2008.25.1.117
  7. Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Evaluating constructivistic learning. Educational Technology, 31(9), 28-33.
  8. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129-169. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062002129
  9. Kim, B., & Kim, J. (2013). Development of analysis framework for exploring PCK type in STEAM education. Journal of Korean Technology Education Association, 13(2), 63-85.
  10. Kim, D., Ko, D., Han, M., & Hong, S. (2014). The effects of science lessons applying STEAM education program on the creativity and interest levels of elementary students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.1.1.00043
  11. Koo, E., & Park, Y. (2011). An analysis of the difficulties faced by new science teachers in secondary schools. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(2), 153-163.
  12. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (2012). STEAM education that can be taken in hand (STEAM guidebook).
  13. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (2015). Development direction of science curriculum.
  14. Kwak, Y. (2002). Impacts and tasks of teacher education programs revealed by preservice teachers/students' intact beliefs. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 23(4), 309-324.
  15. Lee, J. (2015). Development and application of PEIPE model for STEAMbased education. (Doctoral dissertation). Kongju National University.
  16. Lee, J., Park, H., & Kim, J. (2013). Primary teachers' perception analysis on development and application of STEAM education program. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(1), 47-59.
  17. Lee, J., & Shin, Y. (2014). An analysis of elementary school teachers' difficulties in the STEAM class. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), 588-596. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.3.588
  18. Lee, S., Oh, P., Kim, H., Lee, G., Kim, C., & Kim, H. (2009). A review of research perspectives on science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and practical knowledge. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(1), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2009.26.1.27
  19. Lee, Y., & Lee, H. (2014). The effects of engineering design and scientific inquiry based STEAM education programs on the interest, self-efficacy and career choices of middle school students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 18(3), 513-540. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2014.18.3.513
  20. Lim, C.-H., & Oh, B.-J. (2015). Elementary pre-service teachers and in-service teachers' perceptions and demands on STEAM education. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2015.8.1.1
  21. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011). Science curriculum. No. 2011-361.
  22. Noh, H., & Paik, S. (2014). STEAM experienced teachers' perception of STEAM in secondary education. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(10), 375-402.
  23. Noh, S.-G. (2014). The perception on STEAM program of the teachers who participated in the development of the program for gifted classes in primary schools. The Journal of Education, 34(3), 45-63.
  24. Noh, T., Yang, C., Kim, Y., & Kang, H. (2012). A case study on the changes of beginning science-gifted education teachers' teaching professionalism through coteaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 655-670. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.655
  25. Oh, H. (2012). An analysis of changes on the science teachers' stages of concern on STEM education and STEM-PCK. (Doctoral dissertation). Kyungpook National University.
  26. Paik, S., Kim, J., Choi, S., Lee, Y., Choi, J., Yang, K., Jeong, K., Choi, J., Lee, S., Jeon, M., & Kim, K. (2012). The development of curriculum for pre-service teachers of secondary school for STEAM education. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity. Report No. 2012-27.
  27. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
  28. Park, J. (2004). A suggestion of cognitive model of scientific creativity (CMSC). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(2), 375-386.
  29. Porter, A. C., Youngs, P., & Odden, A. (2001). Advances in teacher assessments and their uses. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
  30. Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers' use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270802696115
  31. Shin, D., Kim, J., Kim, R., Lee, J., Lee, H., & Lee, J. (2012). Development of interdisciplinary teacher education programs. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 16(1), 371-398. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2012.16.1.371
  32. Shin, Y., & Han, S., (2011). A study of the elementary school teachers' perception in STEAM education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 514-523.
  33. Shin, Y.-J., Han, S., Kim, H., & Ohn, J. (2012). Development of curriculum in national university of education for STEAM education. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity. Report No. 2012-28.
  34. Son, Y. (2012). Pre-service science teachers' perception of STEAM education and analysis of science and art STEAM class by pre-service science teachers. Biology Education, 40(4), 475-493. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.4.475
  35. Yang, C., Bae, Y., & Noh, T. (2013). Analysis of pre-service secondary science teachers' uses of curriculum materials in curriculum design. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(7), 1312-1328. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1312
  36. Yang, M., Min, B., Son, Y., & Kim, D. (2012). Analyzing the difficulty that pre-service science teacher experiences in the middle school science class: Centered on the application of science class models and inquiry process elements. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 143-164.

Cited by

  1. Development of Teaching Model for Teaching Demonstration of Pre-service Fisheries and Marine School Teachers through Class Consulting vol.29, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2017.29.3.847
  2. Application of Teaching Model through Peer Consulting for Enhancing Instructional Professionalism to Pre-service Teachers of Fisheries and Marine School vol.30, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2018.10.30.5.1528
  3. 중등 과학교사의 융합인재교육(STEAM) 실행에 대한 문화역사적 활동이론(CHAT) 측면에서의 이해 vol.35, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.6.0949
  4. A comparative study of perceptions on STEAM education by the primary and secondary school teachers participated in the advanced STEAM teacher training program vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2016.20.1.50
  5. 중등 예비화학교사의 수업 계획에서 교사용 지도서의 활용 방식 분석 vol.36, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0681
  6. 예비 화학교사들의 실천적 지식(PPK) 함양을 위한 사례연구 -실행공동체(CoP) 활동의 반성적 논의를 중심으로- vol.37, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.2.0347
  7. STEAM 수업에서의 멘토교사 경험이 예비수학교사들의 STEAM 교수 역량에 미치는 효과 vol.32, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2018.32.1.1
  8. 교사학습공동체를 통한 STEAM 수업 사례 연구 vol.38, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.2.147
  9. 예비과학교사의 비유 생성 수업 계획 및 시연에서 나타나는 특징 vol.38, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.4.587
  10. 예비 초등교사의 테크놀로지 교수학적 내용지식을 향상하기 위한 프로그램의 개발 및 적용 vol.38, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2019.38.2.287