DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of experience recognition in 360° virtual reality videos and common videos

360° 가상현실 동영상과 일반 동영상 교육 콘텐츠의 경험인식 비교 분석

  • Jung, Eun-Kyung (Department of Emergency Medical Service, Honam University) ;
  • Jung, Ji-Yeon (Department of Emergency Medical Service, Howon University)
  • Received : 2019.11.08
  • Accepted : 2019.12.13
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study simulates cardiac arrest situations in 360° virtual reality video clips and general video clips, and compares the correlations between educational media and experience recognition. Methods: Experimental research was carried out on a random control group (n=32) and experimental group (n=32) on March 20, 2019. Results: The groups where participants were trained with the 360° virtual reality video clips and a higher score of experience recognition (p=.047) than the group where participants were trained with the general video clips. Moreover, the subfactors of experience recognition including the sense of presence and vividness (p=.05), immersion (p<.05). experience (p<.01), fantasy factor (p<.05). and content satisfaction (p<.05) were positively correlated. Conclusion: Enhancing vividness and the sense of presence when developing virtual reality videos recorded with a 360° camera is thought to enable experience recognition without any direct interaction.

Keywords

References

  1. Milgram P, Kishino F. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems 1994;E77-D(12):1321-9.
  2. Milgram P, Colquhoun H. A taxonomy of real and virtual world display integration. Mixed reality: Merging real and virtual worlds, 1999;1:1-26.
  3. Park IU, Ryu JH, Cho YS, Son MH, Jang JH. Understanding and educational use of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Content. Korea Education and Research Information Service (KERIS). PM 2017-8. Available at: https://www.keris.or.kr/main/ad/pblcte/selectPblcteETCInfo.do?mi=1142&pblcteSeq=12235
  4. Cho E.S. Future Educational Environment Based on Educational Technology Perspective. Journal of Educational Technology 2015;31 (3):687-708. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.31.3.687
  5. Dewey J. Experience and thinking. Democracy and Education: Free Press, Collier-MacMillan Ltd. 1916:139-51.
  6. Dunleavy M. Design principles for augmented reality learning. TechTrends 2014;58(1):28-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0717-2
  7. Andreatta PB, Maslowski E, Petty S, Shim W, Marsh M, et al. Virtual reality triage training provides a viable solution for disaster-preparedness. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2010;17(8):870-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00728.x
  8. Kim DY, Huh JR, Lee JD, Bhang KJ. Implementation of virtual reality for interactive disaster evacuation training using close-range image information. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 2019;22(1):140-53. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2019.22.1.140
  9. Jung EK, Choi SS, Jung JY. Comparison of educational interest, satisfaction, and achievements of educational virtual reality and videos education before simulation training. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2018;22(2):93-102. https://doi.org/10.14408/KJEMS.2018.22.2.093
  10. Steuer J. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 1992;42(4):73-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
  11. Kwon C. Verification of the possibility and effectiveness of experiential learning using HMD-based immersive VR technologies. Virtual Reality 2019;23(1):101-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0364-1
  12. Jung EK. The development and effectiveness of cardiac arrest recognition training contents using virtual reality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chonnam National University 2019, Gwangju, Korea.
  13. Perkins GD, Walker G, Christensen K, Hulme J, Monsieurs KG. Teaching recognition of agonal breathing improves accuracy of diagnosing cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2006;70 (3):432-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.01.015
  14. Kye BK. Investigation on the relationships among media characteristics, presence, flow, and learning effects in augmented reality based learning. Multimedia and E-Content Trends Vieweg+ Teubner 2008:21-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9313-0_3
  15. Grady DJ. A critical review of the application of Kolb's experiential learning theory applied through the use of computer based simulations within virtual environments 2000-2016. State University of New York at Albany, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2017. 10282034.
  16. Yang HC, Chung DH. Influence of 3D characteristics perception on presence, and presence on visual fatigue and perceived eye movement. Journal of Broadcast Engineering 2012;17(1):60-72. https://doi.org/10.5909/JEB.2012.17.1.60
  17. Ryu JH, Park SJ, Park JW, Kim JW, Yoo HJ, Kim TW, et al. Randomized clinical trial of immersive virtual reality tour of the operating theatre in children before anaesthesia. British Journal of Surgery 2017;104(12):1628-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10684
  18. Witmer BG, Singer MJ. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence 1998;7(3):225-40. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686
  19. Park MJ, Lee BJ. The Features of VR (virtual reality) Communication and the aspects of its experience. Institute of Communication Research, Seoul National University. Journal of Communication Research. 2004;41:29-60.
  20. Kwon C. Verification of the possibility and effectiveness of experimental learning using HMD-based immersive VR technologies Virtual Reality 2019;23:101-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0364-1
  21. Shin NM. Telepresence and learners' perceptions of interface: do they affect on cyber-course evaluation and learning activities. Educational Technology International 2005;21(3):215-40. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.21.3.215