Journal of Information Management (정보관리연구)

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Challenges and Solutions of Electronic Journal Consortium

전자저널 컨소시엄의 당면과제와 해결방안 모색

  • Kim, Sang-Jun (Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology)
  • 김상준 (한국생명공학연구원 도서관 및 충남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2010.05.20
  • Accepted : 2010.07.12
  • Published : 2010.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was aimed to establish a workable strategies to operate KESLI consortium reliably. To encourage the research purposes, it was mainly investigated international literature on current challenges for the e-journals consortium in comparison with the domestic implications. Major issues and challenges are divided to six items by scholarly communication changes and e-journals percentage increase, a big deal for a contract -based consortium pricing model in vogue, a consortium of the price hikes and making budget difficulties, use the standard statistics by the results of the use, archiving and archive security uncertainty, and contracts public availability of such external conditions. As a result, the international challenges of E-journals consortium was similar to KESLI, but the depth of information and research on domestic was weaker than the international research. To see more research and a rational perception based on scientific evidence and alternatives that enable KESLI working in the field was needed to be.

본 연구는 KESLI 컨소시엄을 안정적으로 운영하기 위한 실천 가능한 대응 전략을 마련하도록 유도하려는 연구목적에 따라 외국 문헌연구를 통해 전자저널 컨소시엄의 당면과제를 국내와 비교하여 해결방안을 도출하였다. 연구된 주요 당면과제는 학술커뮤니케이션 변화와 전자저널 비중 증대, 빅딜 계약중심의 컨소시엄 가격 모델 성행, 컨소시엄의 가격 인상과 예산 확보 곤란, 이용통계 표준화에 의한 분석 결과의 활용, 아카이빙 및 아카이브 보장의 불확실성, 계약과 서비스 조건의 외부 공개 가능성 등 6개 항목으로 정리하였다. 연구결과 국내외 전자저널 컨소시엄 연구동향과 이슈는 대체로 유사하지만 내용과 연구의 깊이는 달라 국내에서 전자저널 컨소시엄에 대해 더 많은 연구와 보고가 KESLI를 중심으로 이루어져 합리적 인식과 과학적 근거에 기반한 문제제기와 대안제시가 실무현장에서 더 활성화될 필요가 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김상준, 김정아, 이미나. 2001. 과학논문의 전자출판과 무료 전자 아카이브. 한국정보관리학회 2001년도 제8회 학술대회 논문집, 2001: 259-264.
  2. 김성진, 정은경, 한민혜. 2008. 전자저널 컨소시엄을 둘러싼 학술커뮤니케이션의 쟁점과 대응동향. 정보관리연구, 39(1): 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.1.027
  3. 김정환, 이응봉. 2009. KESLI 컨소시엄의 주요 이슈 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 40(3): 99-123.
  4. 김홍렬. 2006. KESLI 참여를 위한 패키지형 전자저널의 평가요소에 관한 고찰. 정보관리연구, 37(4): 49-67.
  5. 신은자. 2001a. 디지털세대의 연속간행물 구독취소와 대응방안에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 18(1): 105-126.
  6. 신은자. 2001b. 전자저널의 가격모형과 가격책정 현황에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 35(2): 151-170.
  7. 신은자. 2001c. 전자저널의 아카이빙에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 18(3): 139-158.
  8. 신은자. 2007. 학술지 빅딜판매의 문제점 및 개선 방안. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(1): 373-389. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.1.373
  9. 이소연. 2008. 새로운 학술커뮤니케이션 환경과 미래형 전자저널 컨소시엄 운영모형 : KESLI를 중심으로. 정보관리연구, 39(1): 1-25.
  10. 전혜영, 박수희. 2008. 전자저널 컨소시엄의 이해관계자 요구 분석 연구. 정보관리연구, 39(1): 53-82.
  11. 최호남, 이응봉. 2005. 해외 전자저널의 디지털 아카이브 구축 전략에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 39(2): 161-183. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2005.39.2.161
  12. 한국과학기술정보연구원. 2010. 2010 KESLI 전자정보 포럼: 정보유통 환경의 변화와 학술/연구정보 서비스의 미래 전망. 대전: 동 연구원.
  13. Association of Research Libraries. 2009. ARL statement to scholarly publishers on the global economic crisis. [cited 2010.03.08]. .
  14. Best, R. D. 2009. "Is the 'Big Deal' dead?" The Serials Librarian, 57(4): 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260903203702
  15. Bucknall, Tim. 2009. "A comparative evaluation of journal literature access options at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro." Interlending & Document Supply, 37(3): 140-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/02641610910985611
  16. Chae, Kyun-Shik, Jong-Seon Park, and Ho-Nam Choi. 2006. "E-journals in Korea: the electronic site licence initiative." The Electronic Library, 24(3): 322-334. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470610671187
  17. Choi, Ho Nam and Eun G. Park. 2007. "Preserving perpetual access to electronic journals: a Korean consortial approach." Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 31(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2007.01.001
  18. Choi, Ho Nam(Kazuko Takagi, transl.). 2001. "The Electronic site licence initiative in Korea(KESLI)." Journal of Information Processing and Management, 44(11): 779-789.
  19. Cox, John and Laura Cox. 2006. Scholarly publishing practice: academic journal publisher's policies and practices in online publishing. ALPSP. [cited 2010.03.14]. .
  20. Cox, John and Laura Cox. 2008. Scholarly publishing practice, third survey 2008: academic journal publisher's policies and practices in online publishing. ALPSP. [cited 2010.03.14]. .
  21. Durrant, Sarah. 2008. Long-term preservation: results from a survey investigating preservation strategies amongst ALPSP publisher members. [cited 2010.03.14]. .
  22. Frazier, Kenneth. 2001. "The librarians' dilemma: contemplating the costs of the 'Big Deal'." D-Lib Magazine, 7(3). [cited 2010.03.08]. .
  23. Frontline Global Marketing Services Ltd. 2009. Consortium Purchasing Directory. [cited 2010.03.14]. .
  24. Gatten, Jeffrey N. and Tom Sanville. 2004. "An orderly retreat from the big deal: is it possible for consortia?" D-Lib Magazine, 10(10). [cited 2010.03.08]. .
  25. Hahn, Karla. 2006. "The state of the large publisher bundle: findings from an ARL member survey." ARL Bimonthly Report, 245: 1-6.
  26. International Coalition of Library Consortia. 2009. Statement on the global economic crisis and its impact on consortial licenses. ICOLC. [cited 2010.03.08]. .
  27. Jackson, M. E. 2005. "The 'bigger deal' is OpenURL." Interlending & Document Supply, 33(3): 172-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/02641610510700430
  28. K. Mulliner. 2001. "To the editor." D-Lib Magazine, 7(4). [cited 2010.03.08]. .
  29. Karasozen, B., A. Kaygusuz, and H. Ozen. 2007. "Patterns of e-journal use within the Anatolian University Library Consortium." Serials, 20(1): 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1629/20037
  30. Kohl, David F. 2007. Ten Years of Big Deals. [cited 2010.03.08]. .
  31. Kyrillidou, Martha and Les Bland. 2009. ARL statistics 2007-2008. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. [cited 2010.03.08]. .
  32. Murphy, S. A. 2007. "The effects of portfolio purchasing on a specialized subject collection." Journal of the Medical Library Association, 95(1): 9-13.
  33. Park, E. G. 2007. "Perspectives on access to electronic journals for long-term preservation." Serials Review, 33(1): 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2006.12.002
  34. Park, E. G. and H. N. Choi. 2006. "Korean electronic site license initiative: archiving of electronic journals." Online Information Review, 30(6): 731-736. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520610716199
  35. Research Information Network. 2008a. Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarly communications system in the UK: report commissioned by the Research Information Network(RIN). [cited 2010.03.14]. .
  36. Research Information Network. 2008b. Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarly communications system: key findings. [cited 2010.03.14]. .
  37. Research Information Network. 2009. E-Journals: their use, value and impact. [cited 2010.03.14]. .
  38. Rowse, Mark. 2003. "The consortium site license: a sustainable model?" Libri, 53: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2003.1
  39. Russell, Ian. 2009. ALPSP survey of librarians: responding to the credit crunch - what now for librarians and libraries? [cited 2010.03.14]. .
  40. Schmid, S. L., G. Ward, and M. Leader. 2007. "MBC and the economics of scientific publishing." ASCB Newsletter, (Apr. 2007): 4-6. [cited 2010. 03.14]. .
  41. Shin, Eun-Ja. 2008. "The Effect of mass purchase on document supply service at south korean medical libraries." Libri, 58(4): 257-264.
  42. Stange, K., K. Hormia-Poutanen, and K. B. Gronvall. 2003. "Cost division models in BIBSAM and FinELib consortia." Serials, 16(3): 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1629/16285
  43. Tattersall, M. 2003. "Big deals: reflections on electronic journal acquisition 1996-2003." Serials, 16(2): 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1629/16201
  44. Taylor-Roe, Jill. 2009. "To every thing there is a season: reflections on the sustainability of the 'big deal' in the current economic climate." Serials, 22(2): 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1629/22113
  45. Termens, M. 2008. "Looking below the surface: the use of electronic journals by the members of a library consortium." Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 32(2): 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2008.05.004
  46. Wolverton, R. E. and T. Bucknall. 2008. "Are consortium "Big Deals" cost effective?: a comparison and analysis of E-journal access mechanisms-workshop report." Serials Librarian, 55(3): 469-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260802059858

Cited by

  1. Seeking Alternative Models and Research Trends for Big Deals in the Electronic Journal Consortium vol.42, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.1.085
  2. Global Dissemination of Domestic Scholarly Journals Using DOI and Open Access vol.42, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.4.001