DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality of Bastard Halibut Surimi Gel as Affected by Harvested Time of Unmarketable Cultured Bastard Halibut Paralichthys olivaceus

생산시기가 비규격 넙치 (Paralichthys olivaceus) 연제품의 품질에 미치는 영향

  • Shin, Jun-Ho (Department of Seafood Science and Technology/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Kwon-Hyun (Department of Seafood Science and Technology/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Sun (Department of Seafood Science and Technology/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyung-Jun (Children's Dietary Life Safety Division, Korea Food & Drug Administration) ;
  • Heu, Min-Soo (Department of Food Science and Nutrition/Industry of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jeon, You-Jin (Faculty of Marine Biomedical Science, Jeju National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Soo (Department of Seafood Science and Technology/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 신준호 (경상대학교 해양식품공학과/해양산업연구소) ;
  • 박권현 (경상대학교 해양식품공학과/해양산업연구소) ;
  • 이지선 (경상대학교 해양식품공학과/해양산업연구소) ;
  • 김형준 (식품의약품안전청 식생활안전과) ;
  • 허민수 (경상대학교 식품영양학과/해양산업연구소) ;
  • 전유진 (제주대학교 해양의생명과학부) ;
  • 김진수 (경상대학교 해양식품공학과/해양산업연구소)
  • Received : 2010.10.12
  • Accepted : 2011.06.15
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the chemical and enzymatic properties of unmarketable cultured bastard halibut (UCBH) Paralichthys olivaceus harvested at different times (March, May, July, September, November, and January), and we examined the physical properties of surimi gel from UCBH as a potential source of surimi and surimi gel. The moisture and crude protein contents of UCBH harvested in July and January were >78% and <19%, respectively, which is greater than the moisture content in UCBH harvested in May, March, and September, but lower than the crude protein content. Regardless of the month of harvest, the UCBH had a higher crude protein content than Alaska pollock, which is the largest fishery biomass used for surimi and surimi gel, but a lower moisture content. Regardless of the month of harvest, the enzymatic activity in crude extracts of UCBH muscle ranged from 0.31-0.59 U/mg for casein (pH 6.0 and 9.0) and 11.7-12.7 U/mg for LeuPNA. These findings suggest that autolytic enzymes were unaffected by gel formation. Gel strength was highest in the surimi gel prepared from UCBH harvested in September, November, and January; second highest in that prepared from UCBH harvested in March and May; and lowest in that prepared from UCBH harvested in July. Compared to the gel strength of surimi gel from grade SA commercial Alaska pollock surimi, the strength of the surimi gels prepared from UCBH harvested in March, May, September, November, and January were superior, whereas that of the surimi gel prepared from UCBH harvested in July was similar.

Keywords

References

  1. An H, Peters MY and Seymour TY. 1996. Role of endogenous enzymes in surimi gelation. Trends Food Sci Technol 7, 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-2244(96)10035-2
  2. Anson ML. 1938. The estimation of pepsin, trypsin papain and cathepsin with hemoglobin. J Physiol 22, 79-89.
  3. AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC., U.S.A., 69-74.
  4. Bonete MJ, Manjon A, Llorca F and Iborre JL. 1984. Acid proteinase activity in fish-I. Comparative study of extraction of cathepsin B and D from Mujil auratus muscle. Comp Biochem Physiol 78B, 203-206.
  5. Cha SH, Jo MR, Lee JS, Lee JH, Ko JY and Jeon YJ. 2009. Preparation and texture characterization of surimi gel using a unmarketable rearing olive flounder. J Kor Fish Soc 42, 109-115. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2009.42.2.109
  6. Erlanger BF, Edel F and Cooper AG. 1966. The action of chymotrypsin on two new chromogenic substrates. Arch Biochem Biophys 155, 206-210.
  7. Erlanger BF, Kokowsky N and Cohen W. 1961. The preparation and properties of two new chromogenic substrates of trypsin. Arch Biochem Biophys 95, 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(61)90145-X
  8. Heu MS, Shin JH, Park KH, Lee JS, Noe, YN, Jeon YJ and Kim JS. 2010. Quality of surimi from unmarketable bastard halibut as affected by the region where cultured. Kor J Fish Aquat Sci 43, 598-605. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2010.43.6.598
  9. Heu MS, Shin JH, Park KH, Lee JS, Noe, YN, Jeon YJ and Kim JS. 2011. Quality of bastard halibut with different weight as a surimi source. Kor J Fish Aquat Sci 44, 18-24. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2011.44.1.018
  10. Kim JS and Park JW. 2004. Characterization of acid-soluble collagen from Pacific whiting surimi processing by-products. J Food Sci 69, 637-642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb09912.x
  11. Korean Statistical Information Service. 2011. http://kosis.kr
  12. Lowry OH, Watanabe NJ, Farr AL and Randall RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin-phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193, 265-269.
  13. Makinodan Y, Toyohara H and Ikeda S. 1983. On the existence of acid, neutral and alkaline proteinases in fish muscle. Bull Japan Soc Sci Fish 49, 109-112. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.49.109
  14. Okada M. 1964. Effect of washing on the gelly forming ability of fish meat. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 30, 255-261. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.30.255
  15. Park CH, Lee JH, Kang KT, Park JW and Kim JS. 2007. Characterization of acid-soluble collagen from Alaska pollock surimi processing by-products (refiner discharge). Food Sci Biotechnol 16, 549-556.
  16. Park JW. 1994. Functional protein additives in surimi gels. J Food Sci 59, 525-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1994.tb05554.x
  17. Park JW and Morrisey MT. 2000. Manufacturing of surimi from light muscle fish. In: Surimi and Surimi Seafood, Park JW, ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, U.S.A., p 23-58.
  18. Park YH, Kim SB and Chang DS. 1995. Seafood Processing. Hyungsul Publishing Ltd., Seoul, Korea. 73-114, 791-838.
  19. Pyeun JH, Lee DS, Kim DS and Heu MS. 1996. Activity screening of the proteolytic enzymes responsible for post-mortem degradation of fish tissues. J Kor Fish Soc 29, 296-308.
  20. Reddy K and Enwemeka CS. 1996. A simplified method for the analysis of hydroproline in biological tissues. Clin Biochem 29, 225-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-9120(96)00003-6
  21. Sato K, Yoshinaka R, Sato M and Shimizu Y. 1986. Collagen content in the muscle of fishes in association with their swimming movement and meat texture. Bull Iapan Soc Sci Fish 52, 1595-1600. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.52.1595
  22. Sovik SL and Rustad T. 2006. Effect of season and fishing ground on the activity of cathepsin B and collagenase in by-products from cod species. LWT 39, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2004.11.006
  23. Steel RGD and Torrie JH. 1980. Principle and Procedures of Statistics. 1st ed. Tokyo. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha. New York, U.S.A., 187-221.
  24. Touhata K, Tanaka M, Toyohara H, Tanaka H, Sakaguchi M. 2000. Seasonal change in collagen content of red seabream muscle. Fisheries Science 66, 553-557. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2000.00073.x

Cited by

  1. Recovery and Fractionation of Serine Protease Inhibitors from Bastard Halibut Paralichthys olivaceus Roe vol.48, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2015.0178