Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study for the Efficiency Analysis on Big Deals of Electronic Journal

전자저널 빅딜계약의 효율성 분석 연구

  • 김정환 (한국과학기술정보연구원 해외정보실) ;
  • 이응봉 (충남대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2013.10.16
  • Accepted : 2013.11.13
  • Published : 2013.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The consumption through e-journal consortia makes researchers locate and use academic resources and information extensively with comparatively cheap costs. This study analyzed and investigated substantive benefits of the big deal contracts for e-journal subscriptions in terms of efficient information use. In other words, this study compare concretely the differences in efficiency of using information between large-size institutions and small-size institutions who participate in the e-journal big deal contracts. This study suggests solutions for the problems which occur persistently and repeatedly in the big deal and new counter plans which can replace the current methods of big deal contracts in a long-term perspective by revealing the gaps of acquiring and using information by the size of participating institutions.

컨소시엄을 통한 공동구매의 이점은 보다 저렴한 비용으로 많은 연구자들이 학술 연구활동에 필요한 광범위한 정보를 용이하게 획득하고 이용할 수 있게 하는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 전자저널 빅딜계약의 혜택에 대한 실증적 분석 및 검증작업을 통한 정보이용 효율성을 확인하고자 하였다. 즉, 전자저널 빅딜계약에 참가하고 있는 규모가 큰 기관과 규모가 작은 기관의 그룹 간 정보이용 효율성에 어떤 차이가 있는지를 구체적으로 규명하여 밝히는 것을 그 목적으로 하였다. 아울러 전자저널 빅딜계약 참가기관의 그룹별 정보획득과 정보이용 결과에 대한 차이를 규명함으로써 지속적으로 반복되고 있는 기관 그룹 간 차이에 대한 불만사항들을 해소하고 나아가 장기적인 안목에서 현재의 빅딜계약 방식을 대체할 수 있는 새로운 대응방안을 모색하는 실마리를 제공하고자 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김상준, 김정환. 2011. 전자저널 빅딜 계약의 연구 동향과 대안 탐색. 정보관리연구, 42(1): 85-111.(Kim, Sang-Jun, & Kim, Jeong-Hwan. 2011. "Seeking Alternative Models and Research Trends for Big Deals in the Electronic Journal Consortium." Journal of Information Management, 42(1): 85-111.) https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.1.085
  2. 김성진, 정은경, 한민혜. 2008. 전자저널 컨소시엄을 둘러싼 학술커뮤니케이션의 쟁점과 대응동향. 정보관리연구, 39(1): 27-52.(Kim, Sung-Jin, Jung, Eun-Kyung, & Han, Min-Hae. 2008. "Challenges and Recent Movements in Scholarly Communication Concerning Electronic Journal Licensing Consortia." Journal of Information Management, 39(1): 27-52.) https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.1.027
  3. 김정환, 이응봉. 2009. KESLI 컨소시엄의 주요이슈 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 40(3): 99-123.(Kim, Jeong-Hwan, & Lee, Eung-Bong. 2009. "A Study on Main Issue Analysis of the KESLI Consortium." Journal of Information Management, 40(3): 99-123.) https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2009.40.3.099
  4. 신은자. 2007. 학술지 빅딜판매의 문제점 및 개선방안. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(1): 378-389.(Shin, Eun-Ja. 2007. "Analysis and Proposals Concerning Big Deals of Scholarly Journals." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(1): 378-389.)
  5. 심원식. 2012. 빅딜, 오픈액세스, 구글학술검색과 대학도서관의 전자학술정보구독. 정보관리학회지, 29(4): 143-163.(Shim, Wonsik. 2012. "Big Deal, Open Access, Google Scholar and the Subscription of Electronic Scholarly Contents at University Libraries." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(4): 143-163.) https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.4.143
  6. 이소연. 2008. 새로운 학술커뮤니케이션 환경과 미래형 전자저널 컨소시엄 운영모형: KESLI를 중심으로. 정보관리연구, 39(1): 1-25.(Lee, So-Yeon. 2008. "A Business Model for Electronic Journal Licensing Consortia in an Emerging Scholarly Communication Environment: The KESLI Case." Journal of Information Management, 39(1): 1-25.) https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.1.001
  7. 전혜영, 박수희. 2008. 전자저널 컨소시엄의 이해관계자 요구 분석 연구. 정보관리연구, 39(1): 53-82.(Jeon, Hae-Yeong, & Park, Soo-Hee. 2008. "A Study on Electronic Journal Consortium Stakeholder Needs Analysis." Journal of Information Management, 39(1): 53-82.) https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.1.053
  8. 황옥경. 2004. 전자저널 라이선스 계약모델에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 38(1): 199-228.(Hwang, Ok Gyung. 2004. "A Study on the Model License for Electronic Journal." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 38(1): 199-228.) https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2004.38.1.199
  9. Amy Yeager. 2013. "ARL Academic Health Sciences Library Statistics 2010-2011." ARL Digital Publication. [online]. [cited 2013.5.31]. .
  10. Best, R. D. 2009. "Is the "Big Deal" dead?" The Serials Librarian, 57(4): 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260903203702
  11. Blecic, D. B., Wiberley, S. E., & Fiscella, J. B. 2013. "Deal of No Deal? Evaluating Big Deals and Their Journals." College & Research Libraries, 74(2): 178-194. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-300
  12. Boissy, R. W. et al. 2012. "Is the Big Deal Dying?" Serials Review, 38(1): 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2011.12.012
  13. Bosch, S., & Henderson, K. 2012. "Periodicals price survey 2012." Library Journal, April 30. [online]. [cited 2013.5.7]. .
  14. Bucknall, Tim. 2009. "A comparative evaluation of journal literature access options at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro." Interlending & Document Supply, 37(3): 140-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/02641610910985611
  15. Bucknell, Terry. 2008. "Usage statistics for big deals: supporting library decision-making." Learned Publishing, 21(3): 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108X323893
  16. Prabha, Chandra. 2007. "Shifting from Print to Electronic Journals in ARL University Libraries." Serials Review, 33(1): 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2006.12.001
  17. Conyers, Angela, & Dalton, Pete. 2008. Assessing the value of the NESLi2 deals.: a report for JISC collections. JISC. [online]. [cited 2013.5.6]. .
  18. Gargiulo, P. 2003. "Electronic journals and users: the CIBER experience in Italy." The Serials, 16(3): 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1629/16293
  19. Ives, Gary, & Fallon, Steve. 2009. "Stung if you do, stung if you don't-the good and the bad of the big deal." Serials Librarian, 56(1): 163-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260802679572
  20. Schöpfel, Joachim, & Leduc, Claire. 2012. "Big deal and long tail: e-journal usage and subscriptions." Library Review, 61(7): 497-510. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531211288245
  21. Kurata, K. M. et al. 2007. "Electronic Journals and their unbundled functions in scholarly communication: Views and utilization by scientific, technological and medical researchers in Japan." Information Processing and Management, 43: 1402-1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.01.006
  22. Tattersall, M. 2003. "Big deals: reflections on electronic journal acquisition 1996-2003." Serials, 16(2): 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1629/16201
  23. Wolfe, Donna., Tafuri, Narda, Owen, Noella, Day, Rebecca, & Lesher, Marcella. 2009. "Smoking out the big deal: getting what you want without getting stung." Serials Librarian, 56(1): 116-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260802679291
  24. Wolverton, R. E., & Bucknall, T. 2008. "Are consortium "Big Deals'' cost effective?: a comparison and analysis of E-journal access mechanisms-workshop report." Serials Librarian, 55(3): 469-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260802059858

Cited by

  1. A Study on Trends of Library Management Research in Korea: Focused on Academic Papers 2004~2013 vol.48, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.4.025