Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health

The Korean Academy of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Health (대한예방치과·구강보건학회)
권호 표지

A study on relationships between oral health care status and QOL and IADL of the elderly

고령자의 구강건강 상태와 IADL, QOL과의 관계

  • Nam, Yong-Ok (Department of Dental Hygiene, Wonkwang Health Science University)
  • 남용옥 (원광보건대학 치위생과)
  • Received : 2010.07.10
  • Accepted : 2010.08.19
  • Published : 2010.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives. In order to evaluate influence on instrumental activities of daly living (IADL) and quality of life (QOL) relevant to oral healthcare status of the elderly, this study investigated socio-demographic characteristics, oral healthcare status, and IADL and QOL by using face scale. Methods. T-test, one-way ANOVA, correlation analysis, and multi regression analysis were used with 315 data finally collected through individual interviews and dental examinations of the elderly over age 60 living in Jeollabukdo province. Results. 1. The numbers of remaining tooth of men and women are similar, and the higher age is, the more significant the number decreases (p<0.001) and IADL and QOL are also damaged, and women's facial expressions are better than men's. 2. IADL and QOL of people without complete denture or partial denture are high, which conversely means that IADL and QOL of people with many remaining teeth are high. IADL is high in people saying that they don't need denture, and their QOL is also high and there is statistically significant difference. 3. The less periodontal diseases are contracted and the cleaner oral cavity is, the higher IADL is and also QOL is shown positively, and there is statistically significant difference in cleanliness of oral cavity (p<0.05). 4. The relationships between chewing ability and IADL and QOL show that IADL and QOL are good in people who can chew all kinds of foods and have experiences of dental treatments, and IADL is statistically significant (p<0.001) but QOL isn't statistically significant. 5. The higher QOL and chewing ability are, the higher IADL is, which is statistically significant (p<0.01). Conclusions. It can be considered that oral healthcare status of the elderly has significant relationships with IADL or QOL. Especially, in order to heighten IADL of the elderly and then to promote QOL, as the number of remaining tooth has great influence, by aggressively applying this in oral healthcare educations or oral healthcare projects, IADL or QOL should be improved.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 원광보건대학

References

  1. 김두섭. 변화하는 노인의 삶과 노인 복지. 서울:동남출판사;2001:272.
  2. 김남희. 노인의 주관적 구강건강상태에 영향을 미치는 요인연구[석사학위논문]. 서울:서울대학교보건대학원;2003:1.
  3. 통계청.통계정보시스템(KOSIS).연령별추계인구(1960-2050). [online]http://www.nso.or.kr 2006. 7. 20.
  4. 신도철. 한국인의 삶의 질 대연구: 주관적 지표에 의한 분석. 서울:정경문화사;1981:9-30.
  5. Reuben DB, Shekelle G, Wenger NS. Quality of care for older persons at the dawn of the third millennium. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:S346-350. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51346.x
  6. 이가령. 농촌지역노인들의 구강상태와 구강건강과 관련된 삶의 질 간의 관련성. 대한구강보건학회지 2008;32(3):396-404.
  7. Atchley RC. The social forces in later life. An introduction to social Gerontology. 2nd ed. Belmont:Wadsworth Publishing Company;1977:104-124.
  8. Havighurst R, Sacher G. Prospects of lengthening life and vigor. in: Wershow H. Controversial issues in gerontology. 28th ed. NewYork:Springer;1981:54-57.
  9. Walker SN, Volken K, Sechris KR, Pender NJ. Health promoting life styles of older adults:Comparisons with young and middle-aged adults, correlates and patterns. Advances of Nursing Science 1988;11(1):76-90.
  10. 양경희, 장혜숙, 김영희. 노인들이 지각하고 있는 건강수준에 관한 연구. 지역사회간호학회지 1996;7(2):231-236.
  11. 김미혜. 행복한 내일을 위한 정년 길라잡이. 서울:동인;1995.
  12. 김설희, 임신아, 박수정, 김동기. 구강건강영향지수를 이용한 삶의 질과 관련된 구강평가. 대한구강보건학회지 2004;28(4):559-569.
  13. 이지연. 일부 노인의 구강관련 삶의 질 평가에서 OHIP 14의 타당도[석사학위논문]. 전북:전북대학교 대학원;2007;17.
  14. Slade GD, Strauss RP, Atchison KA, Kressin NR, Locker D, Reisine ST. Conference summary: assessing oral health outcomes- measuring health status and quality of life. Community Dent Health 1988;15(1):3-7.
  15. Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health 1988;5(1):3-18.
  16. 배광학, 김현덕, 정세환, 박덩영, 백대일, 정성창. 55세 이상 성인대상 구강보건영향지수의 물리적 동통에 관한 연구. 대한구강보건학회지 2003;27(4):527-537.
  17. 이명선, 김설희, 양정숙, 오정숙, 김동기. 65세 이상 일부노인의 Oral Health Impact Profile의 타당도 및 신뢰도. 대한구강보건학회지 2005;29(2):210-221.
  18. Adulyanon S, Sheiham A. Measuring oral health and quality of life: oral impacts on daily performaneces. Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina;1977:151-160.
  19. 류재인, 정세환. 강릉시노인의 일상생활구강영향지수(OIDP) 분포 양상. 대한구강보건학회지 2007;31(2):205-213.
  20. Yamarnaka K, Nakahaki H, Morta I, Suzaki H, Hashimoto M, Sakai T. Comparison of the health condition between the 8020 achivers and the 8020 non-achivers. Int Dent J 2008;58(3):146-150.
  21. Locker D, Matear D, Stephens M, Lawrence H, Payne B. Comparison of the GOHAI and OHIP-14 as measures of the oral health-related quality of life of the elderly. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001;29(5):373-381. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290507.x
  22. 高齢者の口腔健康状態と全身健康状態の関連. [online] http://www.8020zaidan.or.jp 2005.
  23. Lorish CD, Maisiak R. The Face Scale: a brief, nonverbal method for assessing patient mood. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 1986;29:906-909. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780290714
  24. 安藤雄一, 青山旬, 花田信弘. 口腔が健康状態に及ぼす影響と歯科保健医療. J Natl Inst Public Health 2003;52(1):25.
  25. 医療法人社団茜会. 医療と福祉の用語集.辞典. [online]http://www.akanekai.jp 2003.
  26. 개호용어집. [online]http://www.rehanet.co.jp/words/ 2008.
  27. 安藤雄一. 高齢者の健康調査－口の中の状態と健康の関係. 財団法人 8020推進財団자료집 2008;24-25.
  28. Steele JG, Sanders AE, Slade GD, Allen PF, Lahti S, Nuttall N, et al. How do age and tooth loss affect oral health impacts and quality of life?: a study comparing two national samples. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32(2):107-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0301-5661.2004.00131.x
  29. 박지혜, 정성화, 이가령, 송근배. 일부농촌지역 노인들의 치아상실이 구강건강과 관련된 삶의 질에 미치는 영향. 대한구강보건학회지 2008;32(1):70.
  30. Miyazaki H, Shirahama R, Ohtani I, Shimada N, TakeharaT. Oral health conditions and denture treatment needs ininstitutionalized elderly people in Japan. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992;20:297-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1992.tb01703.x
  31. 鈴木美保 '才藤栄一 '小口和代 '加藤友久. 高齢障害者の歯科治療とその障害に対する効果について '日本歯科医師会雑誌 1999;52:608-617.
  32. 米山武義, 吉村光由, 佐々木英忠, 橋本.賢二, 三宅洋一郎, 向井美恵, 渡辺 誠, 赤川安正. 要介護 高齢者に対する口腔衛生の誤嚥性肺炎予防効果に関する研究 日歯医学会誌 2000;20:50-58.
  33. 新開省二, '渡辺修一郎 '熊谷修 '吉田祐子 '藤原佳典 '吉田英世 '石崎達郎 '湯川晴美 '金憲経 '鈴木隆雄 '天野秀紀 '柴田博. 地域高齢者における 準寝たきり の発生率. 予後および危険因子. 日本e公衛誌 2001;48:741-752.
  34. Srisilapanan P, Sheiham A. The prevalence of dental impacts on daily performance (OIDP) in a population of older Tanzanians. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-56
  35. Ekanayake L, Perera I. Yge association between clinical oral health status and oral impacts experienced by older indivicluals in Sri Lanka. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31(9):831-836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01311.x