Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health

The Korean Academy of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Health (대한예방치과·구강보건학회)
권호 표지

A Korean version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in elderly populations: validity and reliability

강원도 일부 노인에서의 노인구강건강평가지수(GOHAI)의 타당도와 신뢰도

  • Shin, Sun-Jung (Department of Dental Hygiene, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jung, Se-Hwan (Department of Preventive and Public Health Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University & Research Institute of Oral Science)
  • 신선정 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 치위생학과) ;
  • 정세환 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 예방치학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Published : 2011.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives. This study was aimed to develop a Korean version of the GOHAI for elderly people. Methods. The GOHAI for elderly people was cross-culturally adapted from English into Korean and then the derived instrument was tested for reliability and validity. The study population consisted of elderly (65+ year-old) residents of Wonju-City, South Korea. Five elderly welfare institutions were selected. Results. 615 people were invited and 155 participated in the study (response rate: 25.2%). The standardized Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.834. Kappa value for the test-retest was 0.482. Participants who responded that they had perceived needs for dental treatment had much lower GOHAI scores than those who did not have a perceived need for treatments (p<0.001). The results from perceived oral health conditions and perceived general health conditions exhibited similar responses; people who considered their oral or general conditions were good had significantly higher GOHAI scores (p<0.01). Conclusions. The Korean version of GOHAI was appropriate to measure the OHRQoL of older Korean people. Longitudinal studies are needed to test the sensitivity of this index.

Keywords

References

  1. 질병관리본부. 2007 국민건강통계. 국민건강영양조사 제4기 1차년도(2007). 서울:보건복지부.질병관리본부;2008:26-77.
  2. WHO. Health Promotion: a discussion document on concept and principles. Geneva:WHO;1984:9-13.
  3. WHO. The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Health Promotion 1. iii-v. Geneva:WHO;1986.
  4. WHO. The World Oral Health Report 2003. Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century: the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme (WHO/NMH/NPH/ORH/03.2).Geneva:WHO;2003:1-38.
  5. 정세환, 김영남, 류재인, 박웅섭, 배광학, 배수명 외 1인. 생애주기별 구강보건사업 발전방안 연구. 강릉:강릉원주대학교 산학협력단. 건강증진사업지원단;2007.
  6. Nutbeam D. Evaluating health promotion - progress, problems and solutions. Health promotion International 1998;13(1):27-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/13.1.27
  7. 류재인, 정세환. 강릉시 노인의 일상생활구강영향지수(OIDP) 분포양상. 대한구강보건학회지 2007;31(2):205-213.
  8. 이명선, 김설희, 양정승, 오정숙, 김동기. 65세 이상 일부 노인의 Oral Health Impact Profile의 타당도 및 신뢰도. 대한구강보건학회지 2005;29(2):210-221.
  9. 김설희, 임선아, 박수정, 김동기. 구강건강영향지수를 이용한 삶의 질과 관련된 구강건강 평가. 대한구강보건학회지 2004;28(4):559-569.
  10. 장은아. 농촌 노인의 건강과 삶의 질의 관계에 관한 연구: 인천광역시 강화군을 중심으로[석사학위논문]. 인천:인하대학교 행정대학원;2009.
  11. Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ 1990;54(11):680-687.
  12. Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health 1988;5(1):3-18.
  13. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994;11(1):3-11.
  14. Adulyanon S, Sheiham A. Oral impacts on daily performances. In Measuring Oral Health and Quality of Life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina;1997:151-160.
  15. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25(4):284-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x
  16. 배광학, 김현덕, 정세환, 박덕영, 백대일, 정성창. 55세 이상 성인대상 구강보건 영향지수의 물리적 동통에 관한 연구. 대한구강보건학회지 2003;27(4):527-537.
  17. Jung SH, Ryu JI, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. A Korean version of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) scale in elderly populations: validity, reliability and prevalence. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008;6:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-17
  18. Atieh MA. Arabic version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. Gerodontology 2008;25(1):34-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00195.x
  19. Tubert-Jeannin S, Riordan PJ, Morel-Papernot A, Porcheray S, Saby-Collet S. Validation of an oral health quality of life index (GOHAI) in France. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003;31(4):275-284. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.t01-1-00006.x
  20. Hagglin C, Berggren U, Lundgren J. A Swedish version of the GOHAI index. Psychometric properties and validation. Swed Dent J 2005;29(3):113-124.
  21. Naito M, Suzukamo Y, Nakayama T, Hamajima N, Fukuhara S. Linguistic adaptation and validation of the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in an elderly Japanese population. J Public Health Dent 2006;66(4):273-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2006.tb04081.x
  22. Hassel AJ, Rolko C, Koke U, Leisen J, Rammelsberg P. A German version of the GOHAI. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008;36(1):34-42.
  23. 허익강, 이태용, 동진근, 홍송희. 일부 노인의 치과보철물 상태가 구강건강관련 삶의 질에 미치는 영향. 대한치과보철학회지 2010;48(2):101-110.
  24. Bloch DA, Kraemer HC. 2x2 kappa coefficients: measures of agreement or association. Biometrecs 1989;45(1):269-287. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532052
  25. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46(12):1417-1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
  26. 한동헌, 김현덕, 순보청, 배광학, 진보형, 백대일. 구강건강 위험요인 파악을 위한 설문지의 타당도 및 신뢰도에 관한 연구. 대한구강보건학회지 2007;31(4):499-509.
  27. Watt RG. Oral Health Promotion Evaluation Toolkit. UK:Stephen Hancocks Limited;2006.
  28. 박명화, 하정철, 신임희, 김한곤, 이신영, 조준행 외 8인. 2008년도 노인실태조사. 전국 노인생활실태 및 복지욕구조사. 서울:보건복지부.계명대학교 산학협력단;2009:301-373.
  29. 보건복지부. 2010년 구강보건사업 안내. 서울:보건복지부;2010:47-68.
  30. 대한구강보건학회.지역구강보건연구회. 2006-2007 연간 활동보고서. 서울:대한구강보건학회.지역구강보건연구회;2007.
  31. 이가령. 농촌지역 노인들의 구강상태와 구강건강과 관련된 삶의 질 간의 관련성. 대한구강보건학회지 2008;32(3):396-404.
  32. 성태제. 타당도와 신뢰도. 서울:학지사;2002:15-163.